How Peers Inform Adolescents' Academic Self-Concept and Achievement: A Three-Wave Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis.

IF 4.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-08 DOI:10.1007/s10964-026-02409-7
Yueyang Sun, Haiying Wang, Bowen Lu, Weichen Wang, Hengzhe Wang, Can Wang
{"title":"How Peers Inform Adolescents' Academic Self-Concept and Achievement: A Three-Wave Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis.","authors":"Yueyang Sun, Haiying Wang, Bowen Lu, Weichen Wang, Hengzhe Wang, Can Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10964-026-02409-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adolescents' everyday peer relationships provide proximal academic information, yet peer-effects research centered on aggregate achievement offers limited insight into these immediate contexts. This study examined longitudinal relations among high-interaction peers' academic performance, adolescents' academic self-concept, and achievement, including gender differences. Three-wave data at three-month intervals were obtained from 1,030 seventh- and eighth-grade Chinese adolescents (M<sub>age</sub> = 13.24 years, SD = 0.75 at baseline; 50.39% girls; 48.25% seventh graders). A random-intercept cross-lagged panel model was estimated, with gender moderation examined through multiple-group analyses. Results showed significant positive between-person associations among the three academic variables. At the within-person level, peer academic performance predicted subsequent academic self-concept and achievement, and academic self-concept and achievement were reciprocally related over time. Peer academic performance also indirectly predicted later achievement through academic self-concept and later academic self-concept through adolescents' own achievement. Gender differences were observed in relations with later achievement. By separating stable differences from within-person variation, the study demonstrates positive within-person relations between proximal peers' academic performance and adolescents' subsequent academic self-concept and achievement, underscoring the importance of proximal peer environments for early adolescents' academic development.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":"2687-2704"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-026-02409-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adolescents' everyday peer relationships provide proximal academic information, yet peer-effects research centered on aggregate achievement offers limited insight into these immediate contexts. This study examined longitudinal relations among high-interaction peers' academic performance, adolescents' academic self-concept, and achievement, including gender differences. Three-wave data at three-month intervals were obtained from 1,030 seventh- and eighth-grade Chinese adolescents (Mage = 13.24 years, SD = 0.75 at baseline; 50.39% girls; 48.25% seventh graders). A random-intercept cross-lagged panel model was estimated, with gender moderation examined through multiple-group analyses. Results showed significant positive between-person associations among the three academic variables. At the within-person level, peer academic performance predicted subsequent academic self-concept and achievement, and academic self-concept and achievement were reciprocally related over time. Peer academic performance also indirectly predicted later achievement through academic self-concept and later academic self-concept through adolescents' own achievement. Gender differences were observed in relations with later achievement. By separating stable differences from within-person variation, the study demonstrates positive within-person relations between proximal peers' academic performance and adolescents' subsequent academic self-concept and achievement, underscoring the importance of proximal peer environments for early adolescents' academic development.

同伴如何告知青少年学业自我概念和成就:一个三波随机截距交叉滞后面板分析。
青少年的日常同伴关系提供了最近的学术信息,然而以总体成就为中心的同伴效应研究对这些直接背景的了解有限。本研究考察了高互动同伴学业成绩、青少年学业自我概念和学业成就之间的纵向关系,包括性别差异。每隔三个月获得1030名中国七年级和八年级青少年的三波数据(年龄= 13.24岁,基线时SD = 0.75; 50.39%的女孩;48.25%的七年级学生)。估计了随机截距交叉滞后面板模型,并通过多组分析检查了性别适度性。结果显示,三个学术变量之间存在显著的正相关。在人际层面上,同伴学业表现预测了随后的学业自我概念和学业成就,并且随着时间的推移,学业自我概念和学业成就相互相关。同伴学业成绩通过学业自我概念间接预测以后的学业成就,并通过青少年自身的学业成就间接预测以后的学业自我概念。性别差异与后来的成就有关。通过将稳定差异与人内差异分离开来,本研究证明了近端同伴的学业成绩与青少年随后的学业自我概念和成就之间存在着积极的人内关系,强调了近端同伴环境对早期青少年学业发展的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Journal of Youth and Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书