Self-Knowledge Accuracy and Psychological Adjustment: A Systematic Review

IF 9.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Michael Dufner, Christoph Heine, Johannes Michalak, Constantine Sedikides
{"title":"Self-Knowledge Accuracy and Psychological Adjustment: A Systematic Review","authors":"Michael Dufner, Christoph Heine, Johannes Michalak, Constantine Sedikides","doi":"10.1177/17456916261470699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of whether self-knowledge is linked to psychological adjustment requires nuanced consideration. Relevant theoretical frameworks pertain to domains of self-knowledge (ability, personality, social perceptions), types of self-knowledge (normative vs. profile), forms of psychological adjustment (intrapersonal vs. interpersonal), or interactions among these factors. In this systematic review, we outline these theoretical frameworks, specify their predicted pattern of association between self-knowledge and psychological adjustment, and evaluate the evidence. The findings do not support the frameworks: Across studies, self-knowledge was unassociated with psychological adjustment. A tentative exception was profile self-knowledge in the domain of social perceptions (knowing how others perceive one’s unique personality configuration), which showed some evidence of a positive association with interpersonal adjustment. Yet given the fragmented state of the literature, many untested constellations of self-knowledge and adjustment, and methodological limitations in the existing evidence, it would be premature to rule out that other forms of self-knowledge may be beneficial for specific adjustment outcomes. We propose a road map for future research, specifying the kinds of studies needed and highlighting methodological considerations crucial for moving the field forward.","PeriodicalId":19757,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Psychological Science","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916261470699","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of whether self-knowledge is linked to psychological adjustment requires nuanced consideration. Relevant theoretical frameworks pertain to domains of self-knowledge (ability, personality, social perceptions), types of self-knowledge (normative vs. profile), forms of psychological adjustment (intrapersonal vs. interpersonal), or interactions among these factors. In this systematic review, we outline these theoretical frameworks, specify their predicted pattern of association between self-knowledge and psychological adjustment, and evaluate the evidence. The findings do not support the frameworks: Across studies, self-knowledge was unassociated with psychological adjustment. A tentative exception was profile self-knowledge in the domain of social perceptions (knowing how others perceive one’s unique personality configuration), which showed some evidence of a positive association with interpersonal adjustment. Yet given the fragmented state of the literature, many untested constellations of self-knowledge and adjustment, and methodological limitations in the existing evidence, it would be premature to rule out that other forms of self-knowledge may be beneficial for specific adjustment outcomes. We propose a road map for future research, specifying the kinds of studies needed and highlighting methodological considerations crucial for moving the field forward.
自我认知准确性与心理调适:系统回顾
自我认知是否与心理调整有关的问题需要细致入微的考虑。相关的理论框架涉及到自我认识的领域(能力、个性、社会感知)、自我认识的类型(规范与侧面)、心理调整的形式(内省与人际),或这些因素之间的相互作用。在这篇系统综述中,我们概述了这些理论框架,明确了它们在自我认知和心理调适之间的预测模式,并评估了证据。研究结果不支持这些框架:在所有研究中,自我认知与心理调整无关。一个暂时的例外是社会知觉领域的轮廓自我认识(知道别人如何看待自己独特的人格结构),它显示出与人际适应呈正相关的一些证据。然而,鉴于文献的碎片化状态,许多未经测试的自我认识和调整,以及现有证据的方法局限性,排除其他形式的自我认识可能对特定调整结果有益还为时过早。我们提出了未来研究的路线图,具体说明了所需的研究种类,并强调了对推动该领域向前发展至关重要的方法考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Perspectives on Psychological Science PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Psychological Science is a journal that publishes a diverse range of articles and reports in the field of psychology. The journal includes broad integrative reviews, overviews of research programs, meta-analyses, theoretical statements, book reviews, and articles on various topics such as the philosophy of science and opinion pieces about major issues in the field. It also features autobiographical reflections of senior members of the field, occasional humorous essays and sketches, and even has a section for invited and submitted articles. The impact of the journal can be seen through the reverberation of a 2009 article on correlative analyses commonly used in neuroimaging studies, which still influences the field. Additionally, a recent special issue of Perspectives, featuring prominent researchers discussing the "Next Big Questions in Psychology," is shaping the future trajectory of the discipline. Perspectives on Psychological Science provides metrics that showcase the performance of the journal. However, the Association for Psychological Science, of which the journal is a signatory of DORA, recommends against using journal-based metrics for assessing individual scientist contributions, such as for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. Therefore, the metrics provided by Perspectives on Psychological Science should only be used by those interested in evaluating the journal itself.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书