Michael Dufner, Christoph Heine, Johannes Michalak, Constantine Sedikides
{"title":"Self-Knowledge Accuracy and Psychological Adjustment: A Systematic Review","authors":"Michael Dufner, Christoph Heine, Johannes Michalak, Constantine Sedikides","doi":"10.1177/17456916261470699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of whether self-knowledge is linked to psychological adjustment requires nuanced consideration. Relevant theoretical frameworks pertain to domains of self-knowledge (ability, personality, social perceptions), types of self-knowledge (normative vs. profile), forms of psychological adjustment (intrapersonal vs. interpersonal), or interactions among these factors. In this systematic review, we outline these theoretical frameworks, specify their predicted pattern of association between self-knowledge and psychological adjustment, and evaluate the evidence. The findings do not support the frameworks: Across studies, self-knowledge was unassociated with psychological adjustment. A tentative exception was profile self-knowledge in the domain of social perceptions (knowing how others perceive one’s unique personality configuration), which showed some evidence of a positive association with interpersonal adjustment. Yet given the fragmented state of the literature, many untested constellations of self-knowledge and adjustment, and methodological limitations in the existing evidence, it would be premature to rule out that other forms of self-knowledge may be beneficial for specific adjustment outcomes. We propose a road map for future research, specifying the kinds of studies needed and highlighting methodological considerations crucial for moving the field forward.","PeriodicalId":19757,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Psychological Science","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916261470699","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The question of whether self-knowledge is linked to psychological adjustment requires nuanced consideration. Relevant theoretical frameworks pertain to domains of self-knowledge (ability, personality, social perceptions), types of self-knowledge (normative vs. profile), forms of psychological adjustment (intrapersonal vs. interpersonal), or interactions among these factors. In this systematic review, we outline these theoretical frameworks, specify their predicted pattern of association between self-knowledge and psychological adjustment, and evaluate the evidence. The findings do not support the frameworks: Across studies, self-knowledge was unassociated with psychological adjustment. A tentative exception was profile self-knowledge in the domain of social perceptions (knowing how others perceive one’s unique personality configuration), which showed some evidence of a positive association with interpersonal adjustment. Yet given the fragmented state of the literature, many untested constellations of self-knowledge and adjustment, and methodological limitations in the existing evidence, it would be premature to rule out that other forms of self-knowledge may be beneficial for specific adjustment outcomes. We propose a road map for future research, specifying the kinds of studies needed and highlighting methodological considerations crucial for moving the field forward.
期刊介绍:
Perspectives on Psychological Science is a journal that publishes a diverse range of articles and reports in the field of psychology. The journal includes broad integrative reviews, overviews of research programs, meta-analyses, theoretical statements, book reviews, and articles on various topics such as the philosophy of science and opinion pieces about major issues in the field. It also features autobiographical reflections of senior members of the field, occasional humorous essays and sketches, and even has a section for invited and submitted articles.
The impact of the journal can be seen through the reverberation of a 2009 article on correlative analyses commonly used in neuroimaging studies, which still influences the field. Additionally, a recent special issue of Perspectives, featuring prominent researchers discussing the "Next Big Questions in Psychology," is shaping the future trajectory of the discipline.
Perspectives on Psychological Science provides metrics that showcase the performance of the journal. However, the Association for Psychological Science, of which the journal is a signatory of DORA, recommends against using journal-based metrics for assessing individual scientist contributions, such as for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. Therefore, the metrics provided by Perspectives on Psychological Science should only be used by those interested in evaluating the journal itself.