Delivering high-quality multiple sclerosis care in Germany: challenges and regional models.

IF 4 Q2 Medicine
Marc Pawlitzki, Niklas Huntemann, Lars Masanneck, Noah M Werner, Julian Zimmermann, Thomas Postert, Christoph Lassek, Sven G Meuth, Klaus Gehring, Joachim Havla, Philipp Albrecht, Tjalf Ziemssen, Matthias Grothe
{"title":"Delivering high-quality multiple sclerosis care in Germany: challenges and regional models.","authors":"Marc Pawlitzki, Niklas Huntemann, Lars Masanneck, Noah M Werner, Julian Zimmermann, Thomas Postert, Christoph Lassek, Sven G Meuth, Klaus Gehring, Joachim Havla, Philipp Albrecht, Tjalf Ziemssen, Matthias Grothe","doi":"10.1186/s42466-026-00531-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) care in Germany has entered a phase in which therapeutic progress is increasingly constrained by delivery capacity. Earlier diagnosis, broader access to high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), and more refined monitoring strategies have improved the potential for favourable long-term outcomes. At the same time, these advances have increased the need for specialised expertise, infusion and monitoring infrastructure, rapid imaging access, structured safety procedures, and cross-sector coordination. Real-world evidence from Germany indicates a shift towards early high-efficacy treatment but also shows regional variation in treatment initiation, therapy intensity, and the proportion of people with MS who remain DMT-untreated. This expert-informed narrative review combines a non-systematic literature review with selected regional implementation examples from German MS care. This review synthesises key delivery challenges in German MS care and maps regional models whose underlying organisational principles may be transferable across healthcare settings, while their specific implementation depends on the local regulatory and reimbursement context. The central argument is that high-quality MS care should be understood not only as a therapeutic decision but as a system property: evidence-based treatment must be embedded in reliable pathways for diagnosis, monitoring, escalation, de-escalation, rehabilitation, and long-term support. Regional models such as ambulatory specialist care structures, hub-and-spoke networks, Germany´s inpatient MS complex treatment programme, delegated task models, telemedical consultation pathways, and digital monitoring infrastructures provide practical building blocks. Implementation at scale will require measurable quality indicators, financing of coordination work, formalised skill-mix models, digital interoperability, and explicit strategies for ageing and multimorbid MS populations. For neurological practice, the challenge is therefore not whether modern MS care is possible, but how to make it reproducible, safe, and equitable across regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13551735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-026-00531-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) care in Germany has entered a phase in which therapeutic progress is increasingly constrained by delivery capacity. Earlier diagnosis, broader access to high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), and more refined monitoring strategies have improved the potential for favourable long-term outcomes. At the same time, these advances have increased the need for specialised expertise, infusion and monitoring infrastructure, rapid imaging access, structured safety procedures, and cross-sector coordination. Real-world evidence from Germany indicates a shift towards early high-efficacy treatment but also shows regional variation in treatment initiation, therapy intensity, and the proportion of people with MS who remain DMT-untreated. This expert-informed narrative review combines a non-systematic literature review with selected regional implementation examples from German MS care. This review synthesises key delivery challenges in German MS care and maps regional models whose underlying organisational principles may be transferable across healthcare settings, while their specific implementation depends on the local regulatory and reimbursement context. The central argument is that high-quality MS care should be understood not only as a therapeutic decision but as a system property: evidence-based treatment must be embedded in reliable pathways for diagnosis, monitoring, escalation, de-escalation, rehabilitation, and long-term support. Regional models such as ambulatory specialist care structures, hub-and-spoke networks, Germany´s inpatient MS complex treatment programme, delegated task models, telemedical consultation pathways, and digital monitoring infrastructures provide practical building blocks. Implementation at scale will require measurable quality indicators, financing of coordination work, formalised skill-mix models, digital interoperability, and explicit strategies for ageing and multimorbid MS populations. For neurological practice, the challenge is therefore not whether modern MS care is possible, but how to make it reproducible, safe, and equitable across regions.

在德国提供高质量的多发性硬化症治疗:挑战和区域模式。
德国的多发性硬化症(MS)治疗已进入一个治疗进展日益受到输送能力限制的阶段。早期诊断、更广泛地获得高效疾病改善疗法(dmt)以及更精细的监测策略,提高了获得有利长期结果的可能性。与此同时,这些进步增加了对专业知识、输液和监测基础设施、快速成像获取、结构化安全程序和跨部门协调的需求。来自德国的真实证据表明,转向早期高效治疗,但也显示了在治疗开始、治疗强度和MS患者未接受dmt治疗的比例方面的地区差异。这篇由专家撰写的叙述性综述结合了非系统文献综述和德国多发性硬化症护理中选定的区域实施实例。本综述综合了德国MS护理的主要交付挑战,并绘制了区域模型,其潜在的组织原则可能在医疗保健环境中可转移,而其具体实施取决于当地的监管和报销环境。中心论点是,高质量的MS护理不仅应被理解为一种治疗决策,而且应被理解为一种系统属性:循证治疗必须嵌入可靠的诊断、监测、升级、降级、康复和长期支持途径中。区域模型,如门诊专科护理结构、中心辐射型网络、德国住院多发性硬化症复杂治疗方案、委托任务模型、远程医疗咨询途径和数字监测基础设施,提供了实用的构建模块。大规模实施将需要可衡量的质量指标、协调工作的资金、正式的技能组合模型、数字互操作性以及针对老龄化和多发性硬髓瘤人群的明确战略。因此,对于神经学实践而言,挑战不在于现代多发性硬化症护理是否可能,而是如何使其在各个地区可重复、安全和公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书