{"title":"Impact of Chalcogen Chemistry on Transient Switching Dynamics in GeAsSe and GeAsTe Ovonic Threshold Switches","authors":"Nishant Saxena;Chengcheng Wang;Zeyu Hu;Guosheng Wang;Muhammad Naqi;Linxi Zhang;Weidong Zhang;Zheng Chai;Daniele Garbin;Robin Degraeve;Sergiu Clima;Taras Ravsher;Attilio Belmonte","doi":"10.1109/TED.2026.3716191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ovonic threshold switch (OTS) devices are used as selectors for emerging nonvolatile memory and neuromorphic computing applications, where their performance and reliability are strongly governed by defect states and carrier localization dynamics. In this work, we present a comparative investigation of GeAsSe and GeAsTe OTS devices to elucidate the impact of chalcogen chemistry on trap energy barriers, defect density, localization kinetics, and overall switching behavior. By combining characterizations with DC, ultrafast pulse, and double-pulse techniques across nanoseconds-to-seconds timescales, we show that material composition affects the localized states, which in turn set the characteristic energy barriers for both field-assisted and thermal-assisted delocalization, and control the leakage current, threshold voltage (V<inline-formula> <tex-math>${}_{\\text {th}}\\text {)}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and recovery dynamics. GeAsSe devices exhibit lower leakage, improved on/off selectivity, and lower recovery-induced Vth shift due to larger delocalization energy, while GeAsTe devices show lower switching field (F<inline-formula> <tex-math>${}_{\\text {th}}\\text {)}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and higher <sc>on</small>-state current, leading to more field-driven and thermal-assisted delocalized defects. These insights establish a direct link between defect energetics and device performance, offering material-level guidelines for OTS optimization.","PeriodicalId":13092,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices","volume":"73 9","pages":"5540-5546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11627705/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ovonic threshold switch (OTS) devices are used as selectors for emerging nonvolatile memory and neuromorphic computing applications, where their performance and reliability are strongly governed by defect states and carrier localization dynamics. In this work, we present a comparative investigation of GeAsSe and GeAsTe OTS devices to elucidate the impact of chalcogen chemistry on trap energy barriers, defect density, localization kinetics, and overall switching behavior. By combining characterizations with DC, ultrafast pulse, and double-pulse techniques across nanoseconds-to-seconds timescales, we show that material composition affects the localized states, which in turn set the characteristic energy barriers for both field-assisted and thermal-assisted delocalization, and control the leakage current, threshold voltage (V${}_{\text {th}}\text {)}$ , and recovery dynamics. GeAsSe devices exhibit lower leakage, improved on/off selectivity, and lower recovery-induced Vth shift due to larger delocalization energy, while GeAsTe devices show lower switching field (F${}_{\text {th}}\text {)}$ , and higher on-state current, leading to more field-driven and thermal-assisted delocalized defects. These insights establish a direct link between defect energetics and device performance, offering material-level guidelines for OTS optimization.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices publishes original and significant contributions relating to the theory, modeling, design, performance and reliability of electron and ion integrated circuit devices and interconnects, involving insulators, metals, organic materials, micro-plasmas, semiconductors, quantum-effect structures, vacuum devices, and emerging materials with applications in bioelectronics, biomedical electronics, computation, communications, displays, microelectromechanics, imaging, micro-actuators, nanoelectronics, optoelectronics, photovoltaics, power ICs and micro-sensors. Tutorial and review papers on these subjects are also published and occasional special issues appear to present a collection of papers which treat particular areas in more depth and breadth.