Differential Effect of Formality of Speech Style on Negation Selection in Korean Children and Adults.

IF 2 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Suji Jung, Jieun Kiaer, Naya Choi
{"title":"Differential Effect of Formality of Speech Style on Negation Selection in Korean Children and Adults.","authors":"Suji Jung, Jieun Kiaer, Naya Choi","doi":"10.1007/s10936-026-10290-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Korean negation has two forms, Short-Form Negation (SFN) and Long-Form Negation (LFN), claimed to have different pragmatic meanings in terms of formality. This paper investigated whether Korean 5-year-old children and adults responded to the level of formality in a conversation, using an experimental design in which a puppet asked the participants either formal or informal-style questions. The results showed that adults produced long-form negation significantly more often in the formal condition than in the informal condition, whereas children predominantly preferred short-form negation across both conditions. Generalized linear mixed-effects modelling revealed significant main effects of speech style and age group. Although the interaction between speech style and age group was not statistically significant, planned pairwise comparisons indicated a significant effect of speech style in adults but not in children. These findings suggest that sensitivity to speech style in negation selection is evident in adults but is not yet fully established in 5-year-old children, supporting the view that pragmatic control over negation forms continues to develop during language acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":47689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research","volume":"55 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13547182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-026-10290-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Korean negation has two forms, Short-Form Negation (SFN) and Long-Form Negation (LFN), claimed to have different pragmatic meanings in terms of formality. This paper investigated whether Korean 5-year-old children and adults responded to the level of formality in a conversation, using an experimental design in which a puppet asked the participants either formal or informal-style questions. The results showed that adults produced long-form negation significantly more often in the formal condition than in the informal condition, whereas children predominantly preferred short-form negation across both conditions. Generalized linear mixed-effects modelling revealed significant main effects of speech style and age group. Although the interaction between speech style and age group was not statistically significant, planned pairwise comparisons indicated a significant effect of speech style in adults but not in children. These findings suggest that sensitivity to speech style in negation selection is evident in adults but is not yet fully established in 5-year-old children, supporting the view that pragmatic control over negation forms continues to develop during language acquisition.

韩语儿童和成人言语风格的正式性对否定选择的差异影响。
韩国语否定有两种形式,即短形式否定(SFN)和长形式否定(LFN),它们在形式上具有不同的语用意义。本文调查了韩国5岁的儿童和成人是否对谈话中的正式程度作出反应,采用了一个实验设计,在这个实验设计中,一个木偶问参与者正式或非正式的问题。结果表明,成年人在正式条件下比在非正式条件下更常产生长形式的否定,而儿童在两种条件下都更倾向于使用短形式的否定。广义线性混合效应模型揭示了语言风格和年龄组的显著主效应。虽然言语风格与年龄组之间的交互作用无统计学意义,但计划两两比较表明,言语风格对成人有显著影响,而对儿童无显著影响。这些发现表明,在否定选择中,对言语风格的敏感性在成人中很明显,但在5岁儿童中尚未完全建立起来,这支持了在语言习得过程中对否定形式的语用控制继续发展的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research publishes carefully selected papers from the several disciplines engaged in psycholinguistic research, providing a single, recognized medium for communications among linguists, psychologists, biologists, sociologists, and others. The journal covers a broad range of approaches to the study of the communicative process, including: the social and anthropological bases of communication; development of speech and language; semantics (problems in linguistic meaning); and biological foundations. Papers dealing with the psychopathology of language and cognition, and the neuropsychology of language and cognition, are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书