Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Among Individuals With Down Syndrome.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Sophie Kowalski, Caron A C Clark
{"title":"Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Among Individuals With Down Syndrome.","authors":"Sophie Kowalski, Caron A C Clark","doi":"10.1111/jir.70163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there is clear evidence that individuals with Down syndrome (DS) experience difficulties in identifying and interpreting emotions, there is limited research on emotional regulation in this population. Furthermore, many studies of individuals with DS focus on group comparisons against typically developing children, with few considering the role of development itself. Here, we addressed these gaps in the literature by examining individual differences in emotion regulation among individuals with DS using a multi-measure, multi-informant approach.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty-eight individuals with DS aged 5-47 years and their caregivers completed an emotion recognition task, direct observations of their emotional negativity and self-comforting strategies during a frustrating puzzle and caregiver and participant reports of emotion regulation. Participants' language and executive function skills were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher age was linked to less negativity and reduced use of comfort strategies during the puzzle task, although the relation of age to negativity was curvilinear, with negative behaviours being more prevalent again in late adulthood. Caregiver and self-reports indicated lower emotional lability among older participants. Language scores were linked to emotion recognition and caregiver-reported emotion regulation. Although correlated themselves, emotion recognition and executive function did not correlate significantly with other emotional regulation measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although further longitudinal research is required, results highlight the importance of a developmental perspective in research on emotion regulation in this population and suggest that interventions to enhance emotion regulation strategies may best be tailored to younger individuals with DS, whereas interventions that target language and executive function may support emotion recognition regardless of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although there is clear evidence that individuals with Down syndrome (DS) experience difficulties in identifying and interpreting emotions, there is limited research on emotional regulation in this population. Furthermore, many studies of individuals with DS focus on group comparisons against typically developing children, with few considering the role of development itself. Here, we addressed these gaps in the literature by examining individual differences in emotion regulation among individuals with DS using a multi-measure, multi-informant approach.

Method: Thirty-eight individuals with DS aged 5-47 years and their caregivers completed an emotion recognition task, direct observations of their emotional negativity and self-comforting strategies during a frustrating puzzle and caregiver and participant reports of emotion regulation. Participants' language and executive function skills were also assessed.

Results: Higher age was linked to less negativity and reduced use of comfort strategies during the puzzle task, although the relation of age to negativity was curvilinear, with negative behaviours being more prevalent again in late adulthood. Caregiver and self-reports indicated lower emotional lability among older participants. Language scores were linked to emotion recognition and caregiver-reported emotion regulation. Although correlated themselves, emotion recognition and executive function did not correlate significantly with other emotional regulation measures.

Conclusion: Although further longitudinal research is required, results highlight the importance of a developmental perspective in research on emotion regulation in this population and suggest that interventions to enhance emotion regulation strategies may best be tailored to younger individuals with DS, whereas interventions that target language and executive function may support emotion recognition regardless of age.

唐氏综合症患者情绪调节的年龄差异。
背景:虽然有明确的证据表明唐氏综合征(DS)患者在识别和解释情绪方面存在困难,但对该人群情绪调节的研究有限。此外,许多关于发育障碍个体的研究都集中在与正常发育儿童的群体比较上,很少考虑发育本身的作用。在这里,我们通过使用多测量、多信息来源的方法来研究DS患者情绪调节的个体差异,从而解决了文献中的这些空白。方法:38例年龄5 ~ 47岁的退行性痴呆患者及其照顾者完成情绪识别任务,直接观察其情绪消极性和自我安慰策略,以及照顾者和参与者的情绪调节报告。参与者的语言和执行能力也被评估。结果:年龄越大,在谜题任务中消极情绪越少,安慰策略的使用也越少,尽管年龄与消极情绪的关系呈曲线关系,在成年后期,消极行为再次变得更加普遍。照顾者和自我报告表明,老年参与者的情绪不稳定性较低。语言分数与情绪识别和照顾者报告的情绪调节有关。情绪识别和执行功能虽然具有相关性,但与其他情绪调节指标的相关性不显著。结论:虽然还需要进一步的纵向研究,但研究结果强调了从发展的角度研究这一人群的情绪调节的重要性,并表明增强情绪调节策略的干预措施可能最适合年轻的DS患者,而针对语言和执行功能的干预措施可能支持不分年龄的情绪识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书