Reference gene stability and stress marker expression during drought and senescence in forage and malting barley

IF 2.3 4区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Myriam Guadalupe Rodríguez-Gandarilla, Julio Armando Massange-Sánchez
{"title":"Reference gene stability and stress marker expression during drought and senescence in forage and malting barley","authors":"Myriam Guadalupe Rodríguez-Gandarilla,&nbsp;Julio Armando Massange-Sánchez","doi":"10.1007/s11738-026-03958-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reference genes are essential for accurate normalisation in qPCR-based gene expression studies, yet their stability can vary widely across tissues, developmental stages, genetic backgrounds and stress conditions. Fourteen candidate reference genes previously reported as stable in barley were evaluated in forage and malting varieties across senescence, grain development, and drought stress. Seven genes satisfied specificity and amplification-efficiency criteria and were subsequently assessed for expression stability using the ΔCt, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and geNorm algorithms integrated through a comprehensive stability index. Across all tissues, <i>EF1α</i> consistently emerged as the most stable reference gene, whereas <i>MALD</i>, <i>UPL</i>, and <i>HSP70</i> provided reliable alternatives depending on the tissue type, variety, or stress condition. In contrast, widely used housekeeping genes such as <i>TUBα</i> showed high variability and were unsuitable as internal controls. To validate the selected reference genes, eight drought- and senescence-responsive marker genes were analysed. Expression profiling normalised with <i>EF1α</i> and <i>MALD</i> revealed both conserved and variety-specific patterns: <i>HSP17</i> and <i>GPR</i> were strongly induced under drought, whereas <i>WRKY1</i> showed mild repression. During senescence, <i>GS2</i> and <i>RBCS</i> were sharply downregulated, while <i>AGTX</i> and <i>SAG12</i> displayed contrasting induction between varieties. These findings identify a robust set of reference genes for barley and reveal distinct stress-response strategies between forage and malting backgrounds, providing a validated framework for qPCR normalisation and stress-adaptation studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6973,"journal":{"name":"Acta Physiologiae Plantarum","volume":"48 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Physiologiae Plantarum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11738-026-03958-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reference genes are essential for accurate normalisation in qPCR-based gene expression studies, yet their stability can vary widely across tissues, developmental stages, genetic backgrounds and stress conditions. Fourteen candidate reference genes previously reported as stable in barley were evaluated in forage and malting varieties across senescence, grain development, and drought stress. Seven genes satisfied specificity and amplification-efficiency criteria and were subsequently assessed for expression stability using the ΔCt, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and geNorm algorithms integrated through a comprehensive stability index. Across all tissues, EF1α consistently emerged as the most stable reference gene, whereas MALD, UPL, and HSP70 provided reliable alternatives depending on the tissue type, variety, or stress condition. In contrast, widely used housekeeping genes such as TUBα showed high variability and were unsuitable as internal controls. To validate the selected reference genes, eight drought- and senescence-responsive marker genes were analysed. Expression profiling normalised with EF1α and MALD revealed both conserved and variety-specific patterns: HSP17 and GPR were strongly induced under drought, whereas WRKY1 showed mild repression. During senescence, GS2 and RBCS were sharply downregulated, while AGTX and SAG12 displayed contrasting induction between varieties. These findings identify a robust set of reference genes for barley and reveal distinct stress-response strategies between forage and malting backgrounds, providing a validated framework for qPCR normalisation and stress-adaptation studies.

牧草和麦芽干旱和衰老期间内参基因稳定性及胁迫标记的表达
在基于qpcr的基因表达研究中,内参基因对于准确正常化至关重要,但它们的稳定性在不同组织、发育阶段、遗传背景和应激条件下存在很大差异。在牧草和麦芽品种中,通过衰老、籽粒发育和干旱胁迫对先前报道在大麦中稳定的14个候选内参基因进行了评估。7个基因满足特异性和扩增效率标准,随后使用ΔCt、BestKeeper、NormFinder和geNorm算法通过综合稳定性指数评估表达稳定性。在所有组织中,EF1α始终是最稳定的内参基因,而MALD、UPL和HSP70则根据组织类型、品种或应激条件提供可靠的替代基因。相比之下,广泛使用的管家基因如TUBα表现出高变异性,不适合作为内部控制。为了验证选择的内参基因,对8个干旱和衰老响应标记基因进行了分析。EF1α和MALD正常化后的表达谱显示出保守和品种特异性模式:HSP17和GPR在干旱条件下被强烈诱导,而WRKY1则表现出轻度抑制。在衰老过程中,GS2和RBCS急剧下调,而AGTX和SAG12在品种间的诱导差异较大。这些发现确定了一组强大的大麦内参基因,揭示了饲料和麦芽背景之间不同的应激反应策略,为qPCR正常化和应激适应研究提供了一个有效的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
125
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: Acta Physiologiae Plantarum is an international journal established in 1978 that publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of plant physiology. The coverage ranges across this research field at various levels of biological organization, from relevant aspects in molecular and cell biology to biochemistry. The coverage is global in scope, offering articles of interest from experts around the world. The range of topics includes measuring effects of environmental pollution on crop species; analysis of genomic organization; effects of drought and climatic conditions on plants; studies of photosynthesis in ornamental plants, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书