Exploring possibilities towards PeRsonalIsed MEdicine in Rheumatoid Arthritis (PRIMERA): tailored modifications to standard treat-to-target management-a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Agnes E M Looijen, Hamit Harun Dag, Judith W Heutz, Floris A van Gaalen, Mirjam C Hegeman, Jos H van der Kaap, Lindy-Anne Korswagen, Roos C Padmos, Naghmeh Riyazi, Julia Spierings, Ilja Tchetverikov, Josien J Veris-van Dieren, Harald E Vonkeman, Annemiek Willemze, Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil, Pascal H P de Jong
{"title":"Exploring possibilities towards PeRsonalIsed MEdicine in Rheumatoid Arthritis (PRIMERA): tailored modifications to standard treat-to-target management-a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial.","authors":"Agnes E M Looijen, Hamit Harun Dag, Judith W Heutz, Floris A van Gaalen, Mirjam C Hegeman, Jos H van der Kaap, Lindy-Anne Korswagen, Roos C Padmos, Naghmeh Riyazi, Julia Spierings, Ilja Tchetverikov, Josien J Veris-van Dieren, Harald E Vonkeman, Annemiek Willemze, Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil, Pascal H P de Jong","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2026-007217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Guidelines for early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend starting methotrexate, with optional glucocorticoid (GC) bridging, followed by treat-to-target intensifications after at least 3 months (routine care). Given RA's heterogeneity, we evaluated a stratified treat-to-target approach (tailor-made approach) consisting of two modifications to routine care: first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) selection stratified by autoantibody status and rapid treatment intensifications guided by early treatment response (within 1 month).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial included adults with DMARD-naïve RA (2010 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) criteria) who were randomly assigned (1:1) to the tailor-made approach or routine care. Both arms followed a treat-to-target strategy, intensifying every 3-4 months until Disease Activity Score (DAS) ≤2.4. The tailor-made approach started MTX in autoantibody-positive patients and hydroxychloroquine in autoantibody-negative patients, both with intramuscular GC bridging. Additional intensifications at months 1 and 4 were allowed when DAS >2.4, 1 month after DMARD initiation or intensification, enabling treatment escalation before the standard 3-month reassessment. Routine care started MTX with GC bridging regardless of autoantibody status and without extra intensifications. The two primary outcomes were targeted synthetic/biologic (ts/b)DMARD use at 10 months and mean DAS over time; superiority required both to favour the tailor-made approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 308 included patients were randomised(152 tailor-made; 156 routine care). At 10 months, ts/bDMARD use was 21% in the tailor-made approach vs 17% in routine care (one-sided p=0.20). Mean DAS trajectories were similar (p=0.57). No differences were observed in mean patient-reported outcome measure trajectories or adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modifying the standard treat-to-target strategy, by stratifying the initial DMARD according to autoantibody status combined with rapidly intensifying therapy based on early treatment response, did not result in superior clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ISRCTN16170070.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13504905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2026-007217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Guidelines for early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend starting methotrexate, with optional glucocorticoid (GC) bridging, followed by treat-to-target intensifications after at least 3 months (routine care). Given RA's heterogeneity, we evaluated a stratified treat-to-target approach (tailor-made approach) consisting of two modifications to routine care: first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) selection stratified by autoantibody status and rapid treatment intensifications guided by early treatment response (within 1 month).

Methods: This multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial included adults with DMARD-naïve RA (2010 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) criteria) who were randomly assigned (1:1) to the tailor-made approach or routine care. Both arms followed a treat-to-target strategy, intensifying every 3-4 months until Disease Activity Score (DAS) ≤2.4. The tailor-made approach started MTX in autoantibody-positive patients and hydroxychloroquine in autoantibody-negative patients, both with intramuscular GC bridging. Additional intensifications at months 1 and 4 were allowed when DAS >2.4, 1 month after DMARD initiation or intensification, enabling treatment escalation before the standard 3-month reassessment. Routine care started MTX with GC bridging regardless of autoantibody status and without extra intensifications. The two primary outcomes were targeted synthetic/biologic (ts/b)DMARD use at 10 months and mean DAS over time; superiority required both to favour the tailor-made approach.

Results: In total, 308 included patients were randomised(152 tailor-made; 156 routine care). At 10 months, ts/bDMARD use was 21% in the tailor-made approach vs 17% in routine care (one-sided p=0.20). Mean DAS trajectories were similar (p=0.57). No differences were observed in mean patient-reported outcome measure trajectories or adverse events.

Conclusion: Modifying the standard treat-to-target strategy, by stratifying the initial DMARD according to autoantibody status combined with rapidly intensifying therapy based on early treatment response, did not result in superior clinical outcomes.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN16170070.

探索类风湿关节炎个体化治疗的可能性(PRIMERA):针对标准治疗到目标管理的量身定制修改——一项多中心、随机、开放标签试验。
目的:早期类风湿关节炎(RA)指南推荐开始使用甲氨蝶呤,可选择糖皮质激素(GC)桥接,然后在至少3个月后进行治疗-靶强化治疗(常规护理)。考虑到RA的异质性,我们评估了一种分层的从治疗到目标的方法(量身定制的方法),包括对常规护理的两种修改:根据自身抗体状态分层选择一线疾病改善抗风湿药物(DMARD),以及根据早期治疗反应(1个月内)指导快速强化治疗。方法:这项多中心、开放标签的随机对照试验纳入了患有DMARD-naïve类风湿性关节炎(2010年美国风湿病学会/欧洲风湿病协会联盟(EULAR)标准)的成年人,他们被随机分配(1:1)到定制方法或常规护理中。两组均采用治疗至目标策略,每3-4个月强化治疗,直至疾病活动评分(DAS)≤2.4。量身定制的方法在自身抗体阳性的患者中开始使用MTX,在自身抗体阴性的患者中开始使用羟氯喹,两者都采用肌肉内GC桥接。当DMARD开始或增强后1个月,即DAS >2.4时,允许在第1个月和第4个月进行额外的强化,以便在标准的3个月重新评估之前进行治疗升级。常规护理开始MTX与GC桥不论自身抗体状态和没有额外的强化。两个主要结果是10个月时靶向合成/生物(ts/b)DMARD的使用和随时间推移的平均DAS;优势要求双方都支持量身定制的方法。结果:共纳入308例患者,其中152例为量身定制,156例为常规护理。在10个月时,量身定制方法中ts/bDMARD的使用率为21%,而常规护理中为17%(单侧p=0.20)。平均DAS轨迹相似(p=0.57)。在平均患者报告的结果测量轨迹或不良事件方面没有观察到差异。结论:通过根据自身抗体状态分层初始DMARD并根据早期治疗反应快速强化治疗来修改标准的靶向治疗策略,并没有取得更好的临床结果。试验注册号:ISRCTN16170070。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RMD Open
RMD Open RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
205
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书