Clinical Application of Midline Catheters in an Acute Care Ward: A Single-center Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 0.6 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Miki Satou, Yusuke Makio, Taku Harada, Kenta Shukuya, Hiroki Taira, Shintaro Kosaka
{"title":"Clinical Application of Midline Catheters in an Acute Care Ward: A Single-center Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Miki Satou, Yusuke Makio, Taku Harada, Kenta Shukuya, Hiroki Taira, Shintaro Kosaka","doi":"10.55729/2000-9666.1586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Midline catheters are a promising alternative to central venous access devices for intermediate-term therapy, with reduced risks of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Their inclusion in the 2024 World Health Organization guidelines reflects increasing global interest. However, their use remains limited to select countries, and real-world clinical data are scarce. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of midline catheters in an acute care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 68 midline catheter insertions in 50 patients between November 2023 and April 2024 in a general internal medicine ward of a 400-bed hospital. Collected data included patient demographics, indications for use, catheter dwell time, number of blood draws, and occurrence of complications. Insertions were ultrasound-guided and performed under sterile precautions. Weekly site disinfection and dressing changes were implemented. Complications were classified as major (CRBSI, symptomatic DVT) or minor (occlusion, poor return, leakage, unintentional removal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 59.5 years (IQR 70-85.75); 46 % were female. All patients required frequent blood sampling. Common indications included prolonged antibiotic therapy (72 %) and difficult venous access (38 %). Median dwell time was 11 days, with a median of 4 blood draws. No CRBSI or symptomatic DVT occurred. Minor complications included leakage (n = 7), unintentional removal (n = 8), poor return (n = 4), and occlusion (n = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Midline catheters demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no major complications and minor complication rates comparable to international data. Preventive strategies should target vulnerable patients to reduce unintentional catheter removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":15460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives","volume":"16 2","pages":"11-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13496489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55729/2000-9666.1586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Midline catheters are a promising alternative to central venous access devices for intermediate-term therapy, with reduced risks of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Their inclusion in the 2024 World Health Organization guidelines reflects increasing global interest. However, their use remains limited to select countries, and real-world clinical data are scarce. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of midline catheters in an acute care setting.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 68 midline catheter insertions in 50 patients between November 2023 and April 2024 in a general internal medicine ward of a 400-bed hospital. Collected data included patient demographics, indications for use, catheter dwell time, number of blood draws, and occurrence of complications. Insertions were ultrasound-guided and performed under sterile precautions. Weekly site disinfection and dressing changes were implemented. Complications were classified as major (CRBSI, symptomatic DVT) or minor (occlusion, poor return, leakage, unintentional removal).

Results: Median age was 59.5 years (IQR 70-85.75); 46 % were female. All patients required frequent blood sampling. Common indications included prolonged antibiotic therapy (72 %) and difficult venous access (38 %). Median dwell time was 11 days, with a median of 4 blood draws. No CRBSI or symptomatic DVT occurred. Minor complications included leakage (n = 7), unintentional removal (n = 8), poor return (n = 4), and occlusion (n = 1).

Conclusion: Midline catheters demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no major complications and minor complication rates comparable to international data. Preventive strategies should target vulnerable patients to reduce unintentional catheter removal.

中线导管在急症病房的临床应用:一项单中心回顾性观察研究。
中线导管是一种很有前途的中期治疗替代中心静脉通路装置,可降低导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)和深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的风险。它们被列入2024年世界卫生组织指南反映了全球日益增长的兴趣。然而,它们的使用仍然局限于选定的国家,真实的临床数据很少。本研究评估了中线导管在急症护理中的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析某400床位医院内科普通病房2023年11月至2024年4月间50例68例中线置管患者。收集的数据包括患者人口统计、使用指征、导管停留时间、抽血次数和并发症的发生。穿刺采用超声引导,并在无菌注意事项下进行。实施每周现场消毒和换药。并发症分为严重(CRBSI,症状性DVT)或轻微(闭塞,不良回流,渗漏,无意移除)。结果:中位年龄59.5岁(IQR 70 ~ 85.75);46%是女性。所有患者均需频繁采血。常见的适应症包括延长抗生素治疗(72%)和静脉通路困难(38%)。中位停留时间为11天,中位抽血4次。无CRBSI或症状性DVT发生。轻微并发症包括渗漏(n = 7)、意外拔出(n = 8)、复位不良(n = 4)和闭塞(n = 1)。结论:中线导管表现出良好的安全性,无重大并发症,轻微并发症发生率与国际数据相当。预防策略应针对易受伤害的患者,以减少意外拔管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: JCHIMP provides: up-to-date information in the field of Internal Medicine to community hospital medical professionals a platform for clinical faculty, residents, and medical students to publish research relevant to community hospital programs. Manuscripts that explore aspects of medicine at community hospitals welcome, including but not limited to: the best practices of community academic programs community hospital-based research opinion and insight from community hospital leadership and faculty the scholarly work of residents and medical students affiliated with community hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书