{"title":"Clinical Application of Midline Catheters in an Acute Care Ward: A Single-center Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Miki Satou, Yusuke Makio, Taku Harada, Kenta Shukuya, Hiroki Taira, Shintaro Kosaka","doi":"10.55729/2000-9666.1586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Midline catheters are a promising alternative to central venous access devices for intermediate-term therapy, with reduced risks of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Their inclusion in the 2024 World Health Organization guidelines reflects increasing global interest. However, their use remains limited to select countries, and real-world clinical data are scarce. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of midline catheters in an acute care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 68 midline catheter insertions in 50 patients between November 2023 and April 2024 in a general internal medicine ward of a 400-bed hospital. Collected data included patient demographics, indications for use, catheter dwell time, number of blood draws, and occurrence of complications. Insertions were ultrasound-guided and performed under sterile precautions. Weekly site disinfection and dressing changes were implemented. Complications were classified as major (CRBSI, symptomatic DVT) or minor (occlusion, poor return, leakage, unintentional removal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 59.5 years (IQR 70-85.75); 46 % were female. All patients required frequent blood sampling. Common indications included prolonged antibiotic therapy (72 %) and difficult venous access (38 %). Median dwell time was 11 days, with a median of 4 blood draws. No CRBSI or symptomatic DVT occurred. Minor complications included leakage (n = 7), unintentional removal (n = 8), poor return (n = 4), and occlusion (n = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Midline catheters demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no major complications and minor complication rates comparable to international data. Preventive strategies should target vulnerable patients to reduce unintentional catheter removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":15460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives","volume":"16 2","pages":"11-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13496489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55729/2000-9666.1586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Midline catheters are a promising alternative to central venous access devices for intermediate-term therapy, with reduced risks of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Their inclusion in the 2024 World Health Organization guidelines reflects increasing global interest. However, their use remains limited to select countries, and real-world clinical data are scarce. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of midline catheters in an acute care setting.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 68 midline catheter insertions in 50 patients between November 2023 and April 2024 in a general internal medicine ward of a 400-bed hospital. Collected data included patient demographics, indications for use, catheter dwell time, number of blood draws, and occurrence of complications. Insertions were ultrasound-guided and performed under sterile precautions. Weekly site disinfection and dressing changes were implemented. Complications were classified as major (CRBSI, symptomatic DVT) or minor (occlusion, poor return, leakage, unintentional removal).
Results: Median age was 59.5 years (IQR 70-85.75); 46 % were female. All patients required frequent blood sampling. Common indications included prolonged antibiotic therapy (72 %) and difficult venous access (38 %). Median dwell time was 11 days, with a median of 4 blood draws. No CRBSI or symptomatic DVT occurred. Minor complications included leakage (n = 7), unintentional removal (n = 8), poor return (n = 4), and occlusion (n = 1).
Conclusion: Midline catheters demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no major complications and minor complication rates comparable to international data. Preventive strategies should target vulnerable patients to reduce unintentional catheter removal.
期刊介绍:
JCHIMP provides: up-to-date information in the field of Internal Medicine to community hospital medical professionals a platform for clinical faculty, residents, and medical students to publish research relevant to community hospital programs. Manuscripts that explore aspects of medicine at community hospitals welcome, including but not limited to: the best practices of community academic programs community hospital-based research opinion and insight from community hospital leadership and faculty the scholarly work of residents and medical students affiliated with community hospitals.