Visual attention and inhibition of school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder level one: Evidence from eye-tracking's prosaccade and anti-saccade tasks.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Marziyeh Rahimi, Saeid Sadeghi, Mohammad Kiani, Hamidreza Pouretemad
{"title":"Visual attention and inhibition of school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder level one: Evidence from eye-tracking's prosaccade and anti-saccade tasks.","authors":"Marziyeh Rahimi, Saeid Sadeghi, Mohammad Kiani, Hamidreza Pouretemad","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2026.2719663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition that is marked by challenges in social communication and the presence of repetitive behaviors. The severity of ASD is categorized into three levels. Children with ASD level 1 (ASD-L1), which is the mildest form, usually have average or above-average intellectual abilities but may experience some cognitive skill deficits.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study compares inhibition and visual attention between children with ASD-L1 and typically developing children (TDC). Eye tracking was used to measure prosaccade (visual attention) and antisaccade (inhibition) tasks from the visual-guided saccade paradigm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 16 children with ASD-L1 (mean age = 7.47) and 14 TDC (mean age = 7.69). There was no significant difference in visual attention between the groups, but inhibition was weaker in children with ASD-L1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight that even with typical intellectual abilities, children with ASD-L1 have significant difficulties in controlling automatic responses to achieve behavioral or cognitive goals (inhibition). The results provide insights into the cognitive profile of children with Level 1 ASD, aiding evaluation and treatment. Future studies should further examine the children with ASD-L1 when they are in situations with a high level of cognitive and behavioral conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2026.2719663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition that is marked by challenges in social communication and the presence of repetitive behaviors. The severity of ASD is categorized into three levels. Children with ASD level 1 (ASD-L1), which is the mildest form, usually have average or above-average intellectual abilities but may experience some cognitive skill deficits.

Method: This study compares inhibition and visual attention between children with ASD-L1 and typically developing children (TDC). Eye tracking was used to measure prosaccade (visual attention) and antisaccade (inhibition) tasks from the visual-guided saccade paradigm.

Results: The study included 16 children with ASD-L1 (mean age = 7.47) and 14 TDC (mean age = 7.69). There was no significant difference in visual attention between the groups, but inhibition was weaker in children with ASD-L1.

Conclusions: These findings highlight that even with typical intellectual abilities, children with ASD-L1 have significant difficulties in controlling automatic responses to achieve behavioral or cognitive goals (inhibition). The results provide insights into the cognitive profile of children with Level 1 ASD, aiding evaluation and treatment. Future studies should further examine the children with ASD-L1 when they are in situations with a high level of cognitive and behavioral conflict.

自闭症谱系障碍学龄儿童的视觉注意和抑制水平:来自眼动追踪的前扫视和反扫视任务的证据。
背景:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)是一种神经发育障碍,其特征是社会沟通障碍和重复行为的存在。自闭症谱系障碍的严重程度分为三个等级。患有ASD 1级(ASD- l1)的儿童,这是最轻微的形式,通常具有平均或高于平均水平的智力能力,但可能会经历一些认知技能缺陷。方法:比较ASD-L1儿童和典型发育儿童(TDC)的抑制和视觉注意。眼动追踪用于测量视觉引导的扫视范式中的前扫视(视觉注意)和反扫视(抑制)任务。结果:本研究纳入16例ASD-L1患儿(平均年龄7.47岁)和14例TDC患儿(平均年龄7.69岁)。各组间视觉注意无显著差异,但ASD-L1患儿的抑制较弱。结论:这些发现强调,即使具有典型的智力能力,ASD-L1儿童在控制自动反应以达到行为或认知目标(抑制)方面也存在重大困难。该结果为了解1级ASD儿童的认知概况,帮助评估和治疗提供了见解。未来的研究应进一步研究ASD-L1患儿在认知和行为冲突较高的情况下的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书