{"title":"Narrative performance and working memory performance in Saudi children with speech sound disorder.","authors":"Adel F Aljadaan","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2026.2719661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the narrative skills and working memory performance of children with speech sound disorder (SSD) and their typically developing peers. The participant group of the study consisted of a total of 60 children (30 children with SSD - 30 typically developing peers). For this purpose, a comparative descriptive research model was used. The independent samples T-test was used to compare the groups in terms of scale scores. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between the Narrative Skills scores and the Working Memory (WM) scale scores of the participants. According to the analysis results, there is a statistically significant difference between the working memory scores and narrative performance scores of the two groups. In this study, verbal short-term memory, verbal working memory, visual short-term memory, and visual working memory scores did not differ according to gender among participants with short-term memory disorder (p > 0.05), however, there was a statistically significant difference in the total working memory score according to gender. The total WM score of the female group was higher than that of the male group. Narrative performance of participants with SSD did not differ according to gender.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2026.2719661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the narrative skills and working memory performance of children with speech sound disorder (SSD) and their typically developing peers. The participant group of the study consisted of a total of 60 children (30 children with SSD - 30 typically developing peers). For this purpose, a comparative descriptive research model was used. The independent samples T-test was used to compare the groups in terms of scale scores. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between the Narrative Skills scores and the Working Memory (WM) scale scores of the participants. According to the analysis results, there is a statistically significant difference between the working memory scores and narrative performance scores of the two groups. In this study, verbal short-term memory, verbal working memory, visual short-term memory, and visual working memory scores did not differ according to gender among participants with short-term memory disorder (p > 0.05), however, there was a statistically significant difference in the total working memory score according to gender. The total WM score of the female group was higher than that of the male group. Narrative performance of participants with SSD did not differ according to gender.
期刊介绍:
Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.