Machine Learning-Based Discrimination of Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia Using Structural Brain Imaging: A Multi-Site Proof-of-Concept Study.

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Edgardo Torres-Carmona, Mario Graff-Guerrero, Shinichiro Nakajima, Yusuke Iwata, Fumihiko Ueno, Teruki Koizumi, Shiori Honda, Sakiko Tsugawa, Saki Homma, Kamiyu Ogyu, Ryosuke Tarumi, Jianmeng Song, Vincenzo Deluca, Gary Remington, Philip Gerretsen, Ariel Graff-Guerrero
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Discrimination of Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia Using Structural Brain Imaging: A Multi-Site Proof-of-Concept Study.","authors":"Edgardo Torres-Carmona, Mario Graff-Guerrero, Shinichiro Nakajima, Yusuke Iwata, Fumihiko Ueno, Teruki Koizumi, Shiori Honda, Sakiko Tsugawa, Saki Homma, Kamiyu Ogyu, Ryosuke Tarumi, Jianmeng Song, Vincenzo Deluca, Gary Remington, Philip Gerretsen, Ariel Graff-Guerrero","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2026.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) affects 20-30% of individuals with schizophrenia, with persistent symptoms, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. Clinical identification remains dependent on sequential antipsychotic trials despite reported structural brain differences between TRS and treatment-responsive schizophrenia (TxR). This study evaluated whether structural MRI features could discriminate clinically defined TRS from TxR using machine learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 225 participants (122 TRS, 103 TxR) from multi-site studies in Canada and Japan were included. Cortical thickness, brain volume, surface area, and intrinsic curvature were derived from T1-weighted MRI using FreeSurfer, with feature engineering generating volumetric-cortical thickness interaction terms. A voting ensemble was evaluated under a primary leakage-controlled NeuroComBat harmonization and a secondary exploratory full-dataset harmonization. Performance was assessed using ROC-AUC, F1 score, precision, and recall.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the leakage-controlled analysis, the voting ensemble achieved a held-out ROC-AUC of 0.57 and macro F1 of 0.56; training cross-validation yielded ROC-AUC of 0.715. The full-dataset harmonization analysis yielded ROC-AUC of 0.60 and macro F1 of 0.62, interpreted cautiously due to leakage. Temporal-occipital cortical thickness and choroid plexus volume interaction terms contributed most to model performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Structural MRI features may support cross-sectional discrimination of TRS from TxR. The divergence between harmonization strategies highlights the importance of leakage-aware preprocessing in neuroimaging. Validation in independent cohorts is required to establish whether these features contribute to earlier identification of treatment resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2026.08.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) affects 20-30% of individuals with schizophrenia, with persistent symptoms, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. Clinical identification remains dependent on sequential antipsychotic trials despite reported structural brain differences between TRS and treatment-responsive schizophrenia (TxR). This study evaluated whether structural MRI features could discriminate clinically defined TRS from TxR using machine learning.

Methods: A total of 225 participants (122 TRS, 103 TxR) from multi-site studies in Canada and Japan were included. Cortical thickness, brain volume, surface area, and intrinsic curvature were derived from T1-weighted MRI using FreeSurfer, with feature engineering generating volumetric-cortical thickness interaction terms. A voting ensemble was evaluated under a primary leakage-controlled NeuroComBat harmonization and a secondary exploratory full-dataset harmonization. Performance was assessed using ROC-AUC, F1 score, precision, and recall.

Results: In the leakage-controlled analysis, the voting ensemble achieved a held-out ROC-AUC of 0.57 and macro F1 of 0.56; training cross-validation yielded ROC-AUC of 0.715. The full-dataset harmonization analysis yielded ROC-AUC of 0.60 and macro F1 of 0.62, interpreted cautiously due to leakage. Temporal-occipital cortical thickness and choroid plexus volume interaction terms contributed most to model performance.

Conclusion: Structural MRI features may support cross-sectional discrimination of TRS from TxR. The divergence between harmonization strategies highlights the importance of leakage-aware preprocessing in neuroimaging. Validation in independent cohorts is required to establish whether these features contribute to earlier identification of treatment resistance.

基于机器学习的脑结构成像对难治性精神分裂症的鉴别:一项多站点概念验证研究。
背景:难治性精神分裂症(TRS)影响20-30%的精神分裂症患者,伴有持续症状、功能障碍和生活质量下降。尽管有报道称TRS和治疗反应性精神分裂症(TxR)之间存在脑结构差异,但临床鉴定仍依赖于序贯抗精神病药物试验。本研究评估了结构MRI特征是否可以使用机器学习区分临床定义的TRS和TxR。方法:共纳入来自加拿大和日本多地点研究的225名参与者(122名TRS, 103名TxR)。使用FreeSurfer从t1加权MRI中获得皮质厚度、脑体积、表面积和固有曲率,并使用特征工程生成体积-皮质厚度相互作用项。在主要的泄漏控制的NeuroComBat协调和次要的探索性全数据集协调下评估投票集合。使用ROC-AUC、F1评分、准确率和召回率评估性能。结果:在泄漏控制分析中,投票集合的hold -out ROC-AUC为0.57,宏观F1为0.56;训练交叉验证的ROC-AUC为0.715。全数据集协调分析得出ROC-AUC为0.60,宏观F1为0.62,由于泄漏,解释谨慎。颞枕皮质厚度和脉络膜丛体积相互作用项对模型性能影响最大。结论:MRI结构特征支持TRS与TxR的横切面鉴别。协调策略之间的分歧突出了泄漏感知预处理在神经成像中的重要性。需要在独立队列中进行验证,以确定这些特征是否有助于早期识别治疗耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychiatry
Biological Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
1398
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书