Ethnic Disparities in Police Diversion and Criminalisation for Drug Possession in England: A Study of 32,758 Incidents

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Ashley Mills, Dan Lewer, Guillermo Reyes Pascual, Nadine Hendrie, Paul Quinton, Matthew Bacon, Alex Stevens
{"title":"Ethnic Disparities in Police Diversion and Criminalisation for Drug Possession in England: A Study of 32,758 Incidents","authors":"Ashley Mills,&nbsp;Dan Lewer,&nbsp;Guillermo Reyes Pascual,&nbsp;Nadine Hendrie,&nbsp;Paul Quinton,&nbsp;Matthew Bacon,&nbsp;Alex Stevens","doi":"10.1111/dar.70230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Police-led drug diversion schemes have expanded across England, yet little is known about whether their use reproduces established ethnic disparities in policing outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using individual-level data from 32,758 incidents recorded by 15 police forces (covering 38% of England's population), we conducted a cohort study to estimate ethnic differences in the likelihood of: (i) being offered diversion for suspected drug possession; and (ii) receiving a criminal sanction. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to adjust for age, sex, suspected drug type and police-force area, with missing data addressed via Bayesian chained imputation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found substantial disparities. Compared with White suspects, Black suspects had significantly lower odds of receiving an offer of diversion (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.65–0.87), while Asian suspects had significantly higher odds (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.09–1.43). For criminalisation, Asian suspects were less likely than White suspects to receive a criminal sanction (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.74–0.89), while Black suspects showed no statistically significant difference.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings extend long-standing evidence of unequal policing, showing that ethnic disparities persist at the earliest decision points of drug law enforcement—even within schemes intended to reduce criminalisation. The results underscore the need for police forces to monitor and remediate disproportionality in diversion decisions. Future work should investigate mechanisms underpinning officers' diversion decisions and assess whether differential access to diversion contributes to cumulative inequalities in police-community relations and downstream criminal justice outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"45 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.70230","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.70230","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Police-led drug diversion schemes have expanded across England, yet little is known about whether their use reproduces established ethnic disparities in policing outcomes.

Methods

Using individual-level data from 32,758 incidents recorded by 15 police forces (covering 38% of England's population), we conducted a cohort study to estimate ethnic differences in the likelihood of: (i) being offered diversion for suspected drug possession; and (ii) receiving a criminal sanction. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to adjust for age, sex, suspected drug type and police-force area, with missing data addressed via Bayesian chained imputation.

Results

We found substantial disparities. Compared with White suspects, Black suspects had significantly lower odds of receiving an offer of diversion (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.65–0.87), while Asian suspects had significantly higher odds (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.09–1.43). For criminalisation, Asian suspects were less likely than White suspects to receive a criminal sanction (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.74–0.89), while Black suspects showed no statistically significant difference.

Discussion and Conclusions

These findings extend long-standing evidence of unequal policing, showing that ethnic disparities persist at the earliest decision points of drug law enforcement—even within schemes intended to reduce criminalisation. The results underscore the need for police forces to monitor and remediate disproportionality in diversion decisions. Future work should investigate mechanisms underpinning officers' diversion decisions and assess whether differential access to diversion contributes to cumulative inequalities in police-community relations and downstream criminal justice outcomes.

在英国,警察转移和毒品犯罪的种族差异:一项对32758起事件的研究
警察主导的毒品转移计划已经扩展到整个英格兰,但很少有人知道他们的使用是否再现了警察结果中既定的种族差异。方法:使用15个警察部队(覆盖英格兰38%的人口)记录的32,758起事件的个人数据,我们进行了一项队列研究,以估计种族差异的可能性:(i)因涉嫌持有毒品而被转移;(二)受到刑事制裁的。使用混合效应logistic回归模型对年龄、性别、涉嫌毒品类型和警察辖区进行调整,缺失数据通过贝叶斯链式imputation解决。结果我们发现了实质性的差异。与白人犯罪嫌疑人相比,黑人犯罪嫌疑人接受转移建议的几率显著低于白人犯罪嫌疑人(比值比0.75,95%可信区间0.65 ~ 0.87),而亚裔犯罪嫌疑人接受转移建议的几率显著高于白人犯罪嫌疑人(比值比1.25,95%可信区间1.09 ~ 1.43)。在定罪方面,亚裔嫌疑人比白人嫌疑人受到刑事制裁的可能性更小(优势比0.81,95%可信区间0.74-0.89),而黑人嫌疑人没有统计学上的显著差异。讨论和结论这些发现延伸了长期存在的不平等警务证据,表明种族差异在毒品执法的最早决策点上仍然存在,甚至在旨在减少犯罪的计划中也是如此。调查结果强调,警察部队有必要监测和纠正分流决定中的不均衡现象。未来的工作应该调查支持警察转移决定的机制,并评估不同的转移机会是否会导致警察-社区关系和下游刑事司法结果中的累积不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书