Spastic co-contraction: A misdirected central command

IF 2.3 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-15 DOI:10.1016/j.cnp.2026.08.005
Jean-Michel Gracies, Robert J. Kahoud, Maria Vinti, Simon C. Gandevia, David Burke, Maud Pradines
{"title":"Spastic co-contraction: A misdirected central command","authors":"Jean-Michel Gracies,&nbsp;Robert J. Kahoud,&nbsp;Maria Vinti,&nbsp;Simon C. Gandevia,&nbsp;David Burke,&nbsp;Maud Pradines","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2026.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Antagonist co-contraction triggered by voluntary agonist command in spastic paresis is poorly understood. Using an isometric ankle paradigm designed to minimize movement-related stretch reflexes, we aimed to characterize the severity, modulation, and neurophysiological origin of spastic co-contraction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirteen subjects with chronic hemi/paraparesis (<em>n</em> = 14 limbs) were seated with the ankle at 90° dorsiflexion, and performed submaximal then maximal isometric voluntary ankle plantar- and dorsiflexion efforts, with the knee flexed then extended (gastrocnemii slack then stretched). Surface and intramuscular EMG recordings (the latter using hook wire electrodes) from agonist and antagonist muscles were combined with ankle torque measurements. Co-contraction severity was classified as <em>absent</em>, no antagonist EMG activity during agonist effort; <em>mild</em>, presence of antagonist EMG activity without torque reversal; or <em>severe</em>, antagonist EMG activity associated with torque in the unintended direction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Antagonist co-contraction occurred in all limbs during dorsi- and plantar flexor efforts. Its severity increased from submaximal to maximal efforts, whether in knee flexion (<em>p</em> = 0.046, Wilcoxon) or knee extension (<em>p</em> = 0.014). Severe plantar flexor co-contraction was more prevalent with the knee extended than flexed (64% <em>vs</em> 0%; <em>p</em> = 0.004, McNemar). Antagonist activity preceded agonist activation in 18% of efforts. In some intramuscular recordings, the first motor unit recruited in co-contractions was identified as that first-recruited when the same muscle was contracted voluntarily as agonist.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Spastic co-contraction likely reflects misdirected descending supraspinal command, potentiated by stretch-related peripheral afferent signals.</div><div><strong>Significance</strong>. Spastic co-contraction is an <em>effort-dependent</em>, <em>stretch-sensitive</em> phenomenon distinct from spasticity, and can severely impair force generation in spastic paresis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"11 ","pages":"Pages 714-726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X2600079X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Antagonist co-contraction triggered by voluntary agonist command in spastic paresis is poorly understood. Using an isometric ankle paradigm designed to minimize movement-related stretch reflexes, we aimed to characterize the severity, modulation, and neurophysiological origin of spastic co-contraction.

Methods

Thirteen subjects with chronic hemi/paraparesis (n = 14 limbs) were seated with the ankle at 90° dorsiflexion, and performed submaximal then maximal isometric voluntary ankle plantar- and dorsiflexion efforts, with the knee flexed then extended (gastrocnemii slack then stretched). Surface and intramuscular EMG recordings (the latter using hook wire electrodes) from agonist and antagonist muscles were combined with ankle torque measurements. Co-contraction severity was classified as absent, no antagonist EMG activity during agonist effort; mild, presence of antagonist EMG activity without torque reversal; or severe, antagonist EMG activity associated with torque in the unintended direction.

Results

Antagonist co-contraction occurred in all limbs during dorsi- and plantar flexor efforts. Its severity increased from submaximal to maximal efforts, whether in knee flexion (p = 0.046, Wilcoxon) or knee extension (p = 0.014). Severe plantar flexor co-contraction was more prevalent with the knee extended than flexed (64% vs 0%; p = 0.004, McNemar). Antagonist activity preceded agonist activation in 18% of efforts. In some intramuscular recordings, the first motor unit recruited in co-contractions was identified as that first-recruited when the same muscle was contracted voluntarily as agonist.

Conclusions

Spastic co-contraction likely reflects misdirected descending supraspinal command, potentiated by stretch-related peripheral afferent signals.
Significance. Spastic co-contraction is an effort-dependent, stretch-sensitive phenomenon distinct from spasticity, and can severely impair force generation in spastic paresis.
痉挛性联合收缩:一种错误的中央指令
目的在痉挛性轻瘫中,拮抗剂由自愿激动剂指令触发的共收缩尚不清楚。采用旨在减少运动相关的拉伸反射的等距踝关节模型,我们旨在描述痉挛性共收缩的严重程度、调节和神经生理起源。方法13例慢性半瘫/全瘫患者(n = 14条肢体)坐下,踝关节背屈90°,进行次大和最大等距踝关节跖和背屈,膝关节屈后伸(腓骨肌松弛后伸)。激动剂和拮抗剂肌肉的表面和肌内肌电图记录(后者使用钩丝电极)与踝关节扭矩测量相结合。共收缩严重程度分类为不存在,在激动剂作用期间无拮抗剂肌电图活动;轻度,存在拮抗剂肌电活动,无转矩逆转;或与非预期方向扭矩相关的严重拮抗剂肌电活动。结果在背屈肌和足底屈肌用力过程中,所有肢体均发生拮抗性共收缩。无论是膝关节屈曲(p = 0.046, Wilcoxon)还是膝关节伸展(p = 0.014),其严重程度都从次最大到最大。严重的足底屈肌共收缩在膝关节伸直时比屈曲时更为普遍(64% vs 0%; p = 0.004, McNemar)。在18%的研究中,拮抗剂的激活先于激动剂的激活。在一些肌内记录中,在共同收缩中招募的第一个运动单位被确定为同一块肌肉作为激动剂自愿收缩时首先招募的运动单位。结论痉挛性共收缩可能反映了错误的下行椎管上指令,并被与拉伸相关的外周传入信号增强。痉挛性共收缩是一种与痉挛不同的力依赖、拉伸敏感的现象,可严重损害痉挛性轻瘫的力产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书