Handedness Influences Subjective Memory Ratings but not Objective Memory Performance in Older Adults.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Annukka K Lindell
{"title":"Handedness Influences Subjective Memory Ratings but not Objective Memory Performance in Older Adults.","authors":"Annukka K Lindell","doi":"10.1177/00315125261475579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Handedness affects cognitive processing strengths. Consistent with the predominant right hemisphere motor control of the left hand, left-handed older adults have superior immediate and delayed visuospatial memory in comparison with right-handers. Investigations of handedness effects on verbal memory in older adults are, however, scarce and the findings inconsistent. The present study thus examined whether left-handed, right-handed and ambidextrous older adults differ in their subjective and objective verbal memory performance. Data were drawn from Wave 9 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), including measures of handedness, self-rated memory, immediate verbal recall, and delayed verbal recall from 51,206 older adults (Females = 28,461, Males = 22,745; <i>M</i> age = 72.1, <i>SD =</i> 7.3, range 60-102). General linear modelling examined the effects of handedness and gender on subjective and objective memory, using age as a covariate. Handedness influenced self-rated memory, with ambidextrous participants rating their memory ability higher than right-handers; however, handedness had no effect on either immediate or delayed recall scores. In contrast gender predicted objective memory performance, with females scoring higher than males for both recall tasks, though not for self-rated memory. Overall, these results suggest that while ambidextrous people are more optimistic about their own memory, handedness does not influence verbal memory performance in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"315125261475579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125261475579","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Handedness affects cognitive processing strengths. Consistent with the predominant right hemisphere motor control of the left hand, left-handed older adults have superior immediate and delayed visuospatial memory in comparison with right-handers. Investigations of handedness effects on verbal memory in older adults are, however, scarce and the findings inconsistent. The present study thus examined whether left-handed, right-handed and ambidextrous older adults differ in their subjective and objective verbal memory performance. Data were drawn from Wave 9 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), including measures of handedness, self-rated memory, immediate verbal recall, and delayed verbal recall from 51,206 older adults (Females = 28,461, Males = 22,745; M age = 72.1, SD = 7.3, range 60-102). General linear modelling examined the effects of handedness and gender on subjective and objective memory, using age as a covariate. Handedness influenced self-rated memory, with ambidextrous participants rating their memory ability higher than right-handers; however, handedness had no effect on either immediate or delayed recall scores. In contrast gender predicted objective memory performance, with females scoring higher than males for both recall tasks, though not for self-rated memory. Overall, these results suggest that while ambidextrous people are more optimistic about their own memory, handedness does not influence verbal memory performance in older adults.

惯用手影响老年人主观记忆评分,但不影响客观记忆表现。
惯用手影响认知加工优势。与左手右半球运动控制的优势相一致,左撇子老年人与右撇子相比具有优越的即时和延迟视觉空间记忆。然而,关于惯用手对老年人言语记忆影响的研究很少,而且研究结果也不一致。因此,本研究考察了左撇子、右撇子和双手灵巧的老年人在主观和客观言语记忆表现上是否存在差异。数据来自欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的第9轮,包括对51,206名老年人(女性= 28,461,男性= 22,745;年龄= 72.1,SD = 7.3,范围60-102)的惯用手、自评记忆、即时言语回忆和延迟言语回忆的测量。一般线性模型检验了利手性和性别对主观和客观记忆的影响,使用年龄作为协变量。惯用手影响了自评记忆,双手灵巧的参与者对自己记忆能力的评价高于右撇子;然而,惯用手对即时或延迟回忆得分都没有影响。相比之下,性别预测了客观记忆表现,女性在两项回忆任务中的得分都高于男性,尽管在自评记忆中没有。总的来说,这些结果表明,虽然双手灵巧的人对自己的记忆更乐观,但惯用手并不影响老年人的言语记忆表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书