Legitimacy by association? How citizens form propriety beliefs through horizontal spillovers in public–private partnerships

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
European Management Journal Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2025.06.007
Martin Sievert, Alexander Pinz, Bernd Helmig
{"title":"Legitimacy by association? How citizens form propriety beliefs through horizontal spillovers in public–private partnerships","authors":"Martin Sievert,&nbsp;Alexander Pinz,&nbsp;Bernd Helmig","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How do citizens form legitimacy judgments about public organizations involved in complex collaborations? This study explores <em>propriety beliefs</em>—citizens’ individual beliefs about the appropriateness and legitimacy of public organizations—as a micro-level component of organizational legitimacy. This question is relevant because <em>legitimacy-as-perception</em> research has largely overlooked how individuals form propriety beliefs in inter-organizational contexts. We address this research gap by theorizing and testing <em>horizontal legitimacy spillovers</em>—a mechanism in which legitimacy judgments about one organization influence perceptions of another, connected organization. Using two pre-registered factorial survey experiments with German citizens (n = 2510), we demonstrate that citizens draw on their propriety beliefs about a collaborating private partner when evaluating a public organization engaged in a public–private partnership. Our findings challenge the assumption that legitimacy judgments are made in isolation, showing instead that they are socially constructed through associative cognitive processes. These insights highlight how organizational legitimacy is shaped in networks and partnerships, underscoring the importance for public organizations to carefully consider potential legitimacy spillovers when entering collaborations with private actors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":"44 4","pages":"Pages 683-697"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237325000957","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do citizens form legitimacy judgments about public organizations involved in complex collaborations? This study explores propriety beliefs—citizens’ individual beliefs about the appropriateness and legitimacy of public organizations—as a micro-level component of organizational legitimacy. This question is relevant because legitimacy-as-perception research has largely overlooked how individuals form propriety beliefs in inter-organizational contexts. We address this research gap by theorizing and testing horizontal legitimacy spillovers—a mechanism in which legitimacy judgments about one organization influence perceptions of another, connected organization. Using two pre-registered factorial survey experiments with German citizens (n = 2510), we demonstrate that citizens draw on their propriety beliefs about a collaborating private partner when evaluating a public organization engaged in a public–private partnership. Our findings challenge the assumption that legitimacy judgments are made in isolation, showing instead that they are socially constructed through associative cognitive processes. These insights highlight how organizational legitimacy is shaped in networks and partnerships, underscoring the importance for public organizations to carefully consider potential legitimacy spillovers when entering collaborations with private actors.
联合的合法性?公民如何通过公私伙伴关系的横向溢出效应形成得体信念
公民如何对参与复杂合作的公共组织形成合法性判断?本研究探讨适当信念——公民对公共组织适当性和合法性的个人信念——作为组织合法性的微观组成部分。这个问题是相关的,因为合法性作为感知的研究在很大程度上忽视了个人如何在组织间环境中形成适当的信念。我们通过理论化和测试横向合法性溢出来解决这一研究缺口。横向合法性溢出是一种机制,在这种机制中,对一个组织的合法性判断会影响对另一个关联组织的看法。通过对德国公民(n = 2510)进行两次预先登记的析因调查实验,我们证明了公民在评估参与公私伙伴关系的公共组织时,会利用他们对合作私营伙伴的适当信念。我们的研究结果挑战了合法性判断是孤立做出的假设,相反,它们是通过联想认知过程在社会上构建的。这些见解强调了组织合法性是如何在网络和伙伴关系中形成的,强调了公共组织在与私人行为体开展合作时仔细考虑潜在合法性溢出效应的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书