Organization as the abuser: Introducing & operationalizing organizational mistreatment

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
European Management Journal Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-07 DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2025.06.003
F. Pınar Acar, A. Başak Ok, Derya Karanfil, H. Canan Sümer, Yonca Toker-Gültaş, Aslı Göncü-Köse
{"title":"Organization as the abuser: Introducing & operationalizing organizational mistreatment","authors":"F. Pınar Acar,&nbsp;A. Başak Ok,&nbsp;Derya Karanfil,&nbsp;H. Canan Sümer,&nbsp;Yonca Toker-Gültaş,&nbsp;Aslı Göncü-Köse","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2025.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study conceptualizes and operationalizes organizational mistreatment, <em>employee perceptions of receiving offensive, hostile, and demeaning treatment from their organization</em>, thereby addressing a gap in the workplace mistreatment literature. Using qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and drawing upon three independent samples, we defined the domain of organizational mistreatment, developed a measure tapping this construct, showed the construct validity of the developed measure, and examined its criterion-related and incremental validity. The results show that employees across diverse industries and organizational types can identify harmful acts in which their organization is perceived as the perpetrator. This study is the first to delineate the domain of the organizational mistreatment construct. The results indicate that the newly developed scale is internally consistent and unidimensional, distinct from abusive supervision, and has criterion-related validity with respect to important outcome variables (i.e., counterproductive work behaviors, affective organizational commitment, job satisfaction, subjective well-being, and burnout). We discuss implications of the construct and the measure together with the limitations of the study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":"44 4","pages":"Pages 635-644"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026323732500091X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study conceptualizes and operationalizes organizational mistreatment, employee perceptions of receiving offensive, hostile, and demeaning treatment from their organization, thereby addressing a gap in the workplace mistreatment literature. Using qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and drawing upon three independent samples, we defined the domain of organizational mistreatment, developed a measure tapping this construct, showed the construct validity of the developed measure, and examined its criterion-related and incremental validity. The results show that employees across diverse industries and organizational types can identify harmful acts in which their organization is perceived as the perpetrator. This study is the first to delineate the domain of the organizational mistreatment construct. The results indicate that the newly developed scale is internally consistent and unidimensional, distinct from abusive supervision, and has criterion-related validity with respect to important outcome variables (i.e., counterproductive work behaviors, affective organizational commitment, job satisfaction, subjective well-being, and burnout). We discuss implications of the construct and the measure together with the limitations of the study.
作为施虐者的组织:组织虐待的介绍和实施
本研究概念化和操作化组织虐待,员工从组织中接受攻击性、敌意和贬低性待遇的感知,从而解决了工作场所虐待文献中的空白。利用定性和定量研究方法,并利用三个独立的样本,我们定义了组织虐待的领域,开发了一个利用这个结构的测量,显示了开发的测量的结构效度,并检查了其标准相关的和增量效度。结果表明,不同行业和组织类型的员工可以识别出他们的组织被视为肇事者的有害行为。本研究首次描绘了组织虐待建构的领域。研究结果表明,新编制的量表具有内在一致性和单向度,与虐待监督不同,在反生产行为、情感组织承诺、工作满意度、主观幸福感和倦怠等重要结果变量上具有标准相关效度。我们讨论了结构和测量的含义以及研究的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书