Fitting in or feeling the tension: Matching personality traits with innovation attributes of corporate coworking spaces

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
European Management Journal Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-12 DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2025.05.002
Lale Gumusluoglu, Paul Hu, Muammer Ozer
{"title":"Fitting in or feeling the tension: Matching personality traits with innovation attributes of corporate coworking spaces","authors":"Lale Gumusluoglu,&nbsp;Paul Hu,&nbsp;Muammer Ozer","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>As the sharing economy continues to grow, more and more companies are developing internal corporate coworking spaces (CCWS) to foster employee collaboration and innovation. Given the crucial role of users in the success of CCWS, past research has focused largely on current users. However, since companies frequently experience employee turnover and must onboard new hires, understanding CCWS adoption requires examining potential users as well. Building on the Person–Environment fit (P–E fit) theory, we extend the Diffusion of Innovation (DoI) framework and the </span>Big Five<span> personality model to explore how the characteristics of CCWS and the personality traits<span> of potential users influence their willingness to adopt these spaces. Our two-wave empirical study found that among the diffusion attributes, relative advantage, compatibility, and observability increased adoption intentions. However, unlike previous research on innovation adoption, we found that complexity did not directly impact adoption intentions. More importantly, the moderation effects revealed that the relationship between relative advantage and adoption intentions was stronger for neurotic individuals but weaker for conscientious ones. Similarly, the relationship between compatibility and adoption intentions was stronger for introverted and conscientious individuals. The relationship between observability and adoption intentions was weaker for neurotic individuals. Finally, while complexity did not directly affect adoption intentions, people with low neuroticism were less likely to adopt CCWS when they found it complex. We discuss the implications of these findings for research and practice.</span></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":"44 4","pages":"Pages 622-634"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237325000751","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the sharing economy continues to grow, more and more companies are developing internal corporate coworking spaces (CCWS) to foster employee collaboration and innovation. Given the crucial role of users in the success of CCWS, past research has focused largely on current users. However, since companies frequently experience employee turnover and must onboard new hires, understanding CCWS adoption requires examining potential users as well. Building on the Person–Environment fit (P–E fit) theory, we extend the Diffusion of Innovation (DoI) framework and the Big Five personality model to explore how the characteristics of CCWS and the personality traits of potential users influence their willingness to adopt these spaces. Our two-wave empirical study found that among the diffusion attributes, relative advantage, compatibility, and observability increased adoption intentions. However, unlike previous research on innovation adoption, we found that complexity did not directly impact adoption intentions. More importantly, the moderation effects revealed that the relationship between relative advantage and adoption intentions was stronger for neurotic individuals but weaker for conscientious ones. Similarly, the relationship between compatibility and adoption intentions was stronger for introverted and conscientious individuals. The relationship between observability and adoption intentions was weaker for neurotic individuals. Finally, while complexity did not directly affect adoption intentions, people with low neuroticism were less likely to adopt CCWS when they found it complex. We discuss the implications of these findings for research and practice.
融入或感受紧张:将个性特征与企业联合办公空间的创新属性相匹配
随着共享经济的持续发展,越来越多的公司正在开发内部企业联合办公空间(CCWS),以促进员工的协作和创新。鉴于用户在CCWS成功中的关键作用,过去的研究主要集中在当前用户身上。然而,由于公司经常会遇到员工离职的情况,必须聘用新员工,因此了解CCWS的采用也需要检查潜在用户。在人-环境契合(P-E fit)理论的基础上,我们扩展了创新扩散(DoI)框架和大五人格模型,探讨CCWS的特征和潜在用户的人格特征如何影响他们采用这些空间的意愿。我们的两波实证研究发现,在传播属性中,相对优势、兼容性和可观察性增加了采用意愿。然而,与以往对创新采用的研究不同,我们发现复杂性并不直接影响采用意图。更重要的是,调节效应揭示了相对优势与收养意愿之间的关系在神经质个体中更强,而在尽责个体中较弱。同样,在性格内向和尽职尽责的个体中,兼容性和收养意愿之间的关系更强。可观察性与收养意向之间的关系在神经质个体中较弱。最后,虽然复杂性不直接影响采用意愿,但当低神经质的人发现CCWS复杂时,他们不太可能采用CCWS。我们将讨论这些发现对研究和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书