{"title":"Simulating large-scale biotech bubble columns: challenges and insights from the parcel approach.","authors":"Carolin Link, Lars Puiman, Ralf Takors","doi":"10.1007/s00449-026-03397-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The growing industrial demand for economically attractive large-scale bioprocesses has increased the need for reliable and computationally feasible modelling approaches. Gas fermentation plays a particular role as the targeted commodities ask for large-scale solutions using bubble-column type bioreactors that allow them to benefit from the economy-of-scale. To reduce development efforts, large-scale designs increasingly build on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. State-of-the-art approaches employ finite-volume Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (FV-RANS) methods that require enormous computational efforts. In contrast, Euler-Lagrange (E-L) approaches offer detailed local resolution as a prerequisite for optimum bioreactor design. By tracking individual bubbles, they predict bubble population dynamics while computations are parallelized. However, to cope with realistic bubble numbers, large-scale simulations typically make use of the so-called 'parcel size' approach, i.e. multiple bubbles are represented by a single computational particle. This study applies Lattice Boltzmann large eddy simulations (LB-LES) to illustrate the observed consequences: Swarm-like bubble behavior is found that results in inhomogeneous bubble distributions. As a consequence, the volumetric mass transfer coefficient k<sub>L</sub>a, a key criterion for design, may be biased. Comparing results with state-of-the-art FV-RANS simulations revealed similarities of transient flow structures and averaged velocity values. However, local deviations are found that mirror handling differences of turbulence representation and the impact of the parcel approach. The findings demonstrate the potential and current limitations of parcel-based modelling for large-scale bioreactors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9024,"journal":{"name":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"2441-2457"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13582231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-026-03397-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The growing industrial demand for economically attractive large-scale bioprocesses has increased the need for reliable and computationally feasible modelling approaches. Gas fermentation plays a particular role as the targeted commodities ask for large-scale solutions using bubble-column type bioreactors that allow them to benefit from the economy-of-scale. To reduce development efforts, large-scale designs increasingly build on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. State-of-the-art approaches employ finite-volume Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (FV-RANS) methods that require enormous computational efforts. In contrast, Euler-Lagrange (E-L) approaches offer detailed local resolution as a prerequisite for optimum bioreactor design. By tracking individual bubbles, they predict bubble population dynamics while computations are parallelized. However, to cope with realistic bubble numbers, large-scale simulations typically make use of the so-called 'parcel size' approach, i.e. multiple bubbles are represented by a single computational particle. This study applies Lattice Boltzmann large eddy simulations (LB-LES) to illustrate the observed consequences: Swarm-like bubble behavior is found that results in inhomogeneous bubble distributions. As a consequence, the volumetric mass transfer coefficient kLa, a key criterion for design, may be biased. Comparing results with state-of-the-art FV-RANS simulations revealed similarities of transient flow structures and averaged velocity values. However, local deviations are found that mirror handling differences of turbulence representation and the impact of the parcel approach. The findings demonstrate the potential and current limitations of parcel-based modelling for large-scale bioreactors.
期刊介绍:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering provides an international peer-reviewed forum to facilitate the discussion between engineering and biological science to find efficient solutions in the development and improvement of bioprocesses. The aim of the journal is to focus more attention on the multidisciplinary approaches for integrative bioprocess design. Of special interest are the rational manipulation of biosystems through metabolic engineering techniques to provide new biocatalysts as well as the model based design of bioprocesses (up-stream processing, bioreactor operation and downstream processing) that will lead to new and sustainable production processes.
Contributions are targeted at new approaches for rational and evolutive design of cellular systems by taking into account the environment and constraints of technical production processes, integration of recombinant technology and process design, as well as new hybrid intersections such as bioinformatics and process systems engineering. Manuscripts concerning the design, simulation, experimental validation, control, and economic as well as ecological evaluation of novel processes using biosystems or parts thereof (e.g., enzymes, microorganisms, mammalian cells, plant cells, or tissue), their related products, or technical devices are also encouraged.
The Editors will consider papers for publication based on novelty, their impact on biotechnological production and their contribution to the advancement of bioprocess and biosystems engineering science. Submission of papers dealing with routine aspects of bioprocess engineering (e.g., routine application of established methodologies, and description of established equipment) are discouraged.