An Examination of Goals Set by Secondary Students: Relationships Between Goal Type and Goal Attainment by Disability Status and Race/Ethnicity

IF 3.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Beth Feuer, Jessica Toste, Karrie Shogren, Elizabeth J. Hart
{"title":"An Examination of Goals Set by Secondary Students: Relationships Between Goal Type and Goal Attainment by Disability Status and Race/Ethnicity","authors":"Beth Feuer, Jessica Toste, Karrie Shogren, Elizabeth J. Hart","doi":"10.1177/00144029261471336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students with disabilities continue to experience disparities in school and postschool outcomes compared with their peers without disabilities. These disparities are further exacerbated for students of color with disabilities. Previous studies have demonstrated associations of self-determination with positive academic, goal attainment, and other transition outcomes. However, differences may exist by race/ethnicity with regard to the operational definition of self-determination, and systemic racism and ableism in schools can impact the enactment of self-determination. Thus, interventions for promoting self-determination aligned with students’ needs and values are required to mitigate systemic barriers that impede student outcomes. To inform this need, the present study analyzed data derived using the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction (SDLMI), an evidence-based, multicomponent intervention, to examine differences in goal setting and attainment for students with and without disabilities by race/ethnicity in inclusive secondary education classes. The results demonstrate differences in the types of academic goals set by students with and without disabilities by race/ethnicity using the SDLMI and in student–teacher ratings of goal attainment by teacher race and student race/ethnicity. Implications for research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptional Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029261471336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students with disabilities continue to experience disparities in school and postschool outcomes compared with their peers without disabilities. These disparities are further exacerbated for students of color with disabilities. Previous studies have demonstrated associations of self-determination with positive academic, goal attainment, and other transition outcomes. However, differences may exist by race/ethnicity with regard to the operational definition of self-determination, and systemic racism and ableism in schools can impact the enactment of self-determination. Thus, interventions for promoting self-determination aligned with students’ needs and values are required to mitigate systemic barriers that impede student outcomes. To inform this need, the present study analyzed data derived using the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction (SDLMI), an evidence-based, multicomponent intervention, to examine differences in goal setting and attainment for students with and without disabilities by race/ethnicity in inclusive secondary education classes. The results demonstrate differences in the types of academic goals set by students with and without disabilities by race/ethnicity using the SDLMI and in student–teacher ratings of goal attainment by teacher race and student race/ethnicity. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
中学生目标设定的考察:目标类型与残疾状况、种族/民族目标达成的关系
与没有残疾的同龄人相比,残疾学生在学校和毕业后的成绩仍然存在差异。这些差异在有色人种残疾学生身上进一步加剧。先前的研究已经证明了自我决定与积极的学业、目标实现和其他过渡结果之间的联系。然而,在自决的实际定义方面,种族/民族可能存在差异,学校中的系统性种族主义和残疾歧视可能影响自决的实施。因此,需要采取干预措施,促进符合学生需求和价值观的自我决定,以减轻阻碍学生成绩的系统性障碍。为了了解这一需求,本研究分析了使用基于证据的多成分干预的自主学习教学模型(SDLMI)得出的数据,以检查在包容性中等教育课程中,不同种族/民族的残疾学生和非残疾学生在目标设定和成就方面的差异。结果表明,使用SDLMI,不同种族的残疾学生和非残疾学生设定的学业目标类型存在差异,教师种族和学生种族/民族对目标实现的师生评分也存在差异。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Exceptional Children, an official journal of The Council for Exceptional Children, publishes original research and analyses that focus on the education and development of exceptional infants, toddlers, children, youth, and adults. This includes descriptions of research, research reviews, methodological reviews of the literature, data-based position papers, policy analyses, and registered reports. Exceptional Children publishes quantitative, qualitative, and single-subject design studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书