Intersectionality in perception

IF 1.4 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
L. E. Walker
{"title":"Intersectionality in perception","authors":"L. E. Walker","doi":"10.1007/s11098-026-02578-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social interactions are often interpreted differently depending on how the individuals involved are categorized.This paper argues that the categories that guide interpretation are intersectional categories, such as “Black woman” or “White man.” Drawing on empirical work in categorization and vision science, I show that person perception typically relies on categories that are highly informative. Highly informative categories are those that guide interaction. I first argue that race or gender used alone are not particularly informative as they do not reliably predict interactions. I then show that intersectional categories are informative, as they activate distinct stereotypes that directly guide interpretation. In advancing this argument, I aim to initiate a philosophical conversation about the structure of social perception itself. To understand and address how social perception shapes our everyday lives, we must acknowledge the intersectionality of perception. Until we do, we will fail to capture the nuance of intergroup dynamics and the means by which they might be improved.","PeriodicalId":48305,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES","volume":"6 1","pages":"2495-2516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-026-02578-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social interactions are often interpreted differently depending on how the individuals involved are categorized.This paper argues that the categories that guide interpretation are intersectional categories, such as “Black woman” or “White man.” Drawing on empirical work in categorization and vision science, I show that person perception typically relies on categories that are highly informative. Highly informative categories are those that guide interaction. I first argue that race or gender used alone are not particularly informative as they do not reliably predict interactions. I then show that intersectional categories are informative, as they activate distinct stereotypes that directly guide interpretation. In advancing this argument, I aim to initiate a philosophical conversation about the structure of social perception itself. To understand and address how social perception shapes our everyday lives, we must acknowledge the intersectionality of perception. Until we do, we will fail to capture the nuance of intergroup dynamics and the means by which they might be improved.
感知中的交叉性
社会互动通常会根据个人的分类而有不同的解释。本文认为,指导解释的范畴是交叉范畴,如“黑人妇女”或“白人男子”。根据分类和视觉科学的经验工作,我表明,人的感知通常依赖于信息丰富的类别。高信息量的类别是那些指导交互的类别。我首先认为,单独使用种族或性别并不能提供特别的信息,因为它们不能可靠地预测相互作用。然后,我展示了交叉分类的信息,因为它们激活了直接指导解释的不同刻板印象。在推进这一论点的过程中,我的目标是发起一场关于社会感知本身结构的哲学对话。为了理解和解决社会感知如何塑造我们的日常生活,我们必须承认感知的交叉性。在我们这样做之前,我们将无法捕捉到群体间动态的细微差别,以及改进它们的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Philosophical Studies was founded in 1950 by Herbert Feigl and Wilfrid Sellars to provide a periodical dedicated to work in analytic philosophy. The journal remains devoted to the publication of papers in exclusively analytic philosophy. Papers applying formal techniques to philosophical problems are welcome. The principal aim is to publish articles that are models of clarity and precision in dealing with significant philosophical issues. It is intended that readers of the journal will be kept abreast of the central issues and problems of contemporary analytic philosophy. Double-blind review procedure The journal follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. Authors are therefore requested to place their name and affiliation on a separate page. Self-identifying citations and references in the article text should either be avoided or left blank when manuscripts are first submitted. Authors are responsible for reinserting self-identifying citations and references when manuscripts are prepared for final submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书