Assessment of genetically modified RF3 Canola Quality (CQ) Brassica juncea (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-158)

IF 3.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), Josep Casacuberta, Francisco Barro, Albert Braeuning, Ruud de Maagd, Michelle M. Epstein, Thomas Frenzel, Jean-Luc Gallois, Frits Koning, Antoine Messéan, F. Javier Moreno, Fabien Nogué, Giovanni Savoini, Alan H. Schulman, Christoph Tebbe, Eve Veromann, Michele Ardizzone, Giacomo De Sanctis, Antonio Fernandez Dumont, Arianna Ferrari, Andrea Gennaro, José Ángel Gómez Ruiz, Tilemachos Goumperis, Dafni Maria Kagkli, Paolo Lenzi, Aleksandra Lewandowska, Silvia Federici, Ana M. Camargo, Franco Maria Neri, Nikoletta Papadopoulou, Tommaso Raffaello
{"title":"Assessment of genetically modified RF3 Canola Quality (CQ) Brassica juncea (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-158)","authors":"EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO),&nbsp;Josep Casacuberta,&nbsp;Francisco Barro,&nbsp;Albert Braeuning,&nbsp;Ruud de Maagd,&nbsp;Michelle M. Epstein,&nbsp;Thomas Frenzel,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Gallois,&nbsp;Frits Koning,&nbsp;Antoine Messéan,&nbsp;F. Javier Moreno,&nbsp;Fabien Nogué,&nbsp;Giovanni Savoini,&nbsp;Alan H. Schulman,&nbsp;Christoph Tebbe,&nbsp;Eve Veromann,&nbsp;Michele Ardizzone,&nbsp;Giacomo De Sanctis,&nbsp;Antonio Fernandez Dumont,&nbsp;Arianna Ferrari,&nbsp;Andrea Gennaro,&nbsp;José Ángel Gómez Ruiz,&nbsp;Tilemachos Goumperis,&nbsp;Dafni Maria Kagkli,&nbsp;Paolo Lenzi,&nbsp;Aleksandra Lewandowska,&nbsp;Silvia Federici,&nbsp;Ana M. Camargo,&nbsp;Franco Maria Neri,&nbsp;Nikoletta Papadopoulou,&nbsp;Tommaso Raffaello","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genetically modified RF3 Canola Quality (CQ) <i>Brassica juncea</i> was developed to confer tolerance to glufosinate-based herbicides and to restore fertility in Barnase-expressing plants. The RF3 event was originally developed in <i>Brassica napus</i> and has previously been assessed by EFSA in application EFSA-GMO-RX-MS8-RF3. The GMO Panel assessment of the molecular characterisation data and bioinformatics analyses did not raise issues that would require specific food and feed safety assessments. None of the identified differences in the agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between RF3 CQ <i>B. juncea</i> and its comparator need further assessment, except for yield, crude fat, aspartic acid and behenic acid (C22:0), which underwent additional evaluation and were found to not raise any environmental impact and safety or nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the PAT/<i>bar</i> and Barstar proteins as expressed in RF3 CQ <i>B. juncea</i> and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of RF3 CQ <i>B. juncea</i>. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from RF3 CQ <i>B. juncea</i> does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that RF3 CQ <i>B. juncea</i> is as safe as the comparator and CQ non-GM <i>B. juncea</i> varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food and feed is considered necessary. In the case of release of RF3 CQ <i>B. juncea</i> material, including viable seeds, into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of RF3 CQ <i>B. juncea</i>. The GMO Panel concludes that RF3 CQ <i>B. juncea</i> is as safe as its comparator and the tested CQ non-GM <i>B. juncea</i> varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"24 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13435101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genetically modified RF3 Canola Quality (CQ) Brassica juncea was developed to confer tolerance to glufosinate-based herbicides and to restore fertility in Barnase-expressing plants. The RF3 event was originally developed in Brassica napus and has previously been assessed by EFSA in application EFSA-GMO-RX-MS8-RF3. The GMO Panel assessment of the molecular characterisation data and bioinformatics analyses did not raise issues that would require specific food and feed safety assessments. None of the identified differences in the agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between RF3 CQ B. juncea and its comparator need further assessment, except for yield, crude fat, aspartic acid and behenic acid (C22:0), which underwent additional evaluation and were found to not raise any environmental impact and safety or nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the PAT/bar and Barstar proteins as expressed in RF3 CQ B. juncea and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of RF3 CQ B. juncea. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from RF3 CQ B. juncea does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that RF3 CQ B. juncea is as safe as the comparator and CQ non-GM B. juncea varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food and feed is considered necessary. In the case of release of RF3 CQ B. juncea material, including viable seeds, into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of RF3 CQ B. juncea. The GMO Panel concludes that RF3 CQ B. juncea is as safe as its comparator and the tested CQ non-GM B. juncea varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

转基因芥菜RF3油菜品质评价(申请EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-158)。
研究开发了转基因RF3油菜品质(CQ)芥菜,使其对草铵膦类除草剂具有耐受性,并恢复表达barnase的植物的育性。RF3事件最初是在甘蓝型油菜中开发的,此前已由欧洲食品安全局在应用EFSA- gmo - rx - ms8 -RF3中进行了评估。转基因生物小组对分子特征数据和生物信息学分析的评估没有提出需要进行具体食品和饲料安全评估的问题。除了产量、粗脂肪、天冬氨酸和白脱酸(C22:0)进行了额外的评估,没有发现任何环境影响、安全或营养问题外,RF3 CQ B. juncea与其比较物在农艺、表型和组成特征上的差异需要进一步评估。转基因专家小组没有发现RF3 CQ B. juncea中表达的PAT/bar和Barstar蛋白的毒性和致敏性方面的安全问题,也没有发现基因改造会改变RF3 CQ B. juncea整体致敏性的证据。在这一应用的背景下,食用来自RF3 CQ B. juncea的食物和饲料并不代表人类和动物的营养问题。转基因专家小组得出结论,RF3 CQ芥菜与对照品种和CQ非转基因芥菜品种一样安全,认为没有必要对食品和饲料进行上市后监测。在向环境中释放RF3 CQ B. juncea材料,包括可活种子的情况下,这不会引起环境安全问题。上市后环境监测计划和报告时间间隔符合RF3 CQ B. juncea的预期用途。转基因生物小组的结论是,就其对人类和动物健康以及环境的潜在影响而言,RF3 CQ芥子甘蓝与其比较品和经测试的CQ非转基因芥子甘蓝品种一样安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书