Declarative and Procedural Knowledge in English Speakers' L2 Chinese: Evidence of Verbal Identity Condition in L2 Chinese TP Ellipsis.

IF 2 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Lilong Xu, Boping Yuan
{"title":"Declarative and Procedural Knowledge in English Speakers' L2 Chinese: Evidence of Verbal Identity Condition in L2 Chinese TP Ellipsis.","authors":"Lilong Xu, Boping Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s10936-026-10273-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study reports on an empirical study, focusing on the declarative and procedural knowledge in English-speaking learners' acquisition of the verbal identity condition in their second language Chinese grammars. While subjects and objects in English sentences are generally overt, both subjects and objects in Chinese can be 'covert'. It is argued in this article that the absence of subjects and objects in affirmative answers to Chinese yes-no questions arises from TP ellipsis under a verbal identity condition (Simpson, 2014). A cross-modal self-paced reading task (SRT) and an acceptability judgment task (AJT) are involved in the study, and the results of the AJT show that all learner groups, like native Chinese speakers, judge answers with covert arguments under the verbal identity condition as more natural than those not under such a condition. In the SRT, however, beginner learners, but not intermediate and advanced learners, fail to show sensitivity to the verbal identity condition. These findings align with the Declarative/Procedural Model (Ullman, 2005, 2015), indicating that beginners rely on declarative, rule-based knowledge to evaluate grammaticality but lack proceduralized capacity to process covert arguments in real time. With increased exposure and proficiency, learners proceduralize grammatical computations, such as lexical identity checking, movement, and ellipsis, which enable them to acquire native-like sensitivity to the verbal identity condition in their procedural as well as declarative knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":47689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research","volume":"55 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-026-10273-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study reports on an empirical study, focusing on the declarative and procedural knowledge in English-speaking learners' acquisition of the verbal identity condition in their second language Chinese grammars. While subjects and objects in English sentences are generally overt, both subjects and objects in Chinese can be 'covert'. It is argued in this article that the absence of subjects and objects in affirmative answers to Chinese yes-no questions arises from TP ellipsis under a verbal identity condition (Simpson, 2014). A cross-modal self-paced reading task (SRT) and an acceptability judgment task (AJT) are involved in the study, and the results of the AJT show that all learner groups, like native Chinese speakers, judge answers with covert arguments under the verbal identity condition as more natural than those not under such a condition. In the SRT, however, beginner learners, but not intermediate and advanced learners, fail to show sensitivity to the verbal identity condition. These findings align with the Declarative/Procedural Model (Ullman, 2005, 2015), indicating that beginners rely on declarative, rule-based knowledge to evaluate grammaticality but lack proceduralized capacity to process covert arguments in real time. With increased exposure and proficiency, learners proceduralize grammatical computations, such as lexical identity checking, movement, and ellipsis, which enable them to acquire native-like sensitivity to the verbal identity condition in their procedural as well as declarative knowledge.

英语使用者的二语汉语陈述性和程序性知识:二语汉语TP省略的言语同一性证据。
本研究对英语学习者在第二语言汉语语法中言语同一性条件习得中的陈述性和程序性知识进行了实证研究。英语句子中的主语和宾语通常是显性的,而汉语中的主语和宾语都可以是“隐性的”。本文认为,汉语“是-否”问题的肯定回答中主语和客体的缺失是由言语同一性条件下的TP省略引起的(Simpson, 2014)。在跨模态自定节奏阅读任务(SRT)和可接受性判断任务(AJT)的研究中,AJT的结果表明,在言语认同条件下,所有的学习者群体,如母语为汉语的人,对带有隐蔽论据的答案的判断比没有这种条件的学习者更自然。然而,在SRT中,初级学习者对言语同一性条件的敏感度不高,而中级和高级学习者则没有。这些发现与声明性/程序性模型(Ullman, 2005,2015)一致,表明初学者依赖声明性的、基于规则的知识来评估语法性,但缺乏程序化的能力来实时处理隐蔽的参数。随着接触和熟练程度的增加,学习者将语法计算程序化,如词汇同一性检查、移动和省略,这使他们在程序性和陈述性知识中获得对言语同一性条件的类似于母语的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research publishes carefully selected papers from the several disciplines engaged in psycholinguistic research, providing a single, recognized medium for communications among linguists, psychologists, biologists, sociologists, and others. The journal covers a broad range of approaches to the study of the communicative process, including: the social and anthropological bases of communication; development of speech and language; semantics (problems in linguistic meaning); and biological foundations. Papers dealing with the psychopathology of language and cognition, and the neuropsychology of language and cognition, are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书