{"title":"Declarative and Procedural Knowledge in English Speakers' L2 Chinese: Evidence of Verbal Identity Condition in L2 Chinese TP Ellipsis.","authors":"Lilong Xu, Boping Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s10936-026-10273-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study reports on an empirical study, focusing on the declarative and procedural knowledge in English-speaking learners' acquisition of the verbal identity condition in their second language Chinese grammars. While subjects and objects in English sentences are generally overt, both subjects and objects in Chinese can be 'covert'. It is argued in this article that the absence of subjects and objects in affirmative answers to Chinese yes-no questions arises from TP ellipsis under a verbal identity condition (Simpson, 2014). A cross-modal self-paced reading task (SRT) and an acceptability judgment task (AJT) are involved in the study, and the results of the AJT show that all learner groups, like native Chinese speakers, judge answers with covert arguments under the verbal identity condition as more natural than those not under such a condition. In the SRT, however, beginner learners, but not intermediate and advanced learners, fail to show sensitivity to the verbal identity condition. These findings align with the Declarative/Procedural Model (Ullman, 2005, 2015), indicating that beginners rely on declarative, rule-based knowledge to evaluate grammaticality but lack proceduralized capacity to process covert arguments in real time. With increased exposure and proficiency, learners proceduralize grammatical computations, such as lexical identity checking, movement, and ellipsis, which enable them to acquire native-like sensitivity to the verbal identity condition in their procedural as well as declarative knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":47689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research","volume":"55 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-026-10273-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study reports on an empirical study, focusing on the declarative and procedural knowledge in English-speaking learners' acquisition of the verbal identity condition in their second language Chinese grammars. While subjects and objects in English sentences are generally overt, both subjects and objects in Chinese can be 'covert'. It is argued in this article that the absence of subjects and objects in affirmative answers to Chinese yes-no questions arises from TP ellipsis under a verbal identity condition (Simpson, 2014). A cross-modal self-paced reading task (SRT) and an acceptability judgment task (AJT) are involved in the study, and the results of the AJT show that all learner groups, like native Chinese speakers, judge answers with covert arguments under the verbal identity condition as more natural than those not under such a condition. In the SRT, however, beginner learners, but not intermediate and advanced learners, fail to show sensitivity to the verbal identity condition. These findings align with the Declarative/Procedural Model (Ullman, 2005, 2015), indicating that beginners rely on declarative, rule-based knowledge to evaluate grammaticality but lack proceduralized capacity to process covert arguments in real time. With increased exposure and proficiency, learners proceduralize grammatical computations, such as lexical identity checking, movement, and ellipsis, which enable them to acquire native-like sensitivity to the verbal identity condition in their procedural as well as declarative knowledge.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research publishes carefully selected papers from the several disciplines engaged in psycholinguistic research, providing a single, recognized medium for communications among linguists, psychologists, biologists, sociologists, and others. The journal covers a broad range of approaches to the study of the communicative process, including: the social and anthropological bases of communication; development of speech and language; semantics (problems in linguistic meaning); and biological foundations. Papers dealing with the psychopathology of language and cognition, and the neuropsychology of language and cognition, are also included.