Longitudinal Relationships between Three Types of Parental Psychological Control and Social Anxiety and the Mediating Role of Intolerance of Uncertainty in Middle Adolescents.

IF 4.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-28 DOI:10.1007/s10964-026-02395-w
Yinqiu Zhao, Zhaoying Wang, Shuang Li, Lijuan Cui
{"title":"Longitudinal Relationships between Three Types of Parental Psychological Control and Social Anxiety and the Mediating Role of Intolerance of Uncertainty in Middle Adolescents.","authors":"Yinqiu Zhao, Zhaoying Wang, Shuang Li, Lijuan Cui","doi":"10.1007/s10964-026-02395-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several prior studies have investigated the within-person bidirectional associations between parental psychological control and adolescent social anxiety, yet the findings remain inconsistent. Furthermore, few studies have differentiated the unique effects of different types of parental psychological control strategies, despite the potential for variations in their associative patterns and underlying mechanisms with adolescent social anxiety. To address these gaps, the present study employed Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Models to separately examine the within-person bidirectional associations between three types of parental psychological control (i.e., guilt induction, love withdrawal, and authority assertion) and social anxiety, as well as the potential mediating role of intolerance of uncertainty. A total of 1,374 Chinese high school students (52.6% girls; M<sub>age</sub> = 15.40 years, SD = 0.63) participated in this four-wave longitudinal survey with six-month intervals. The results revealed that all three types of parental psychological control were directly associated with subsequent increases in social anxiety. However, only guilt induction and love withdrawal had an indirect within-person effect on social anxiety via intolerance of uncertainty. Conversely, adolescent social anxiety was directly associated with subsequent increases in love withdrawal and authority assertion, while social anxiety, through an increase in intolerance of uncertainty, predicted only the exacerbation of guilt induction. These findings underscore the importance of reducing all types of parental psychological control in the mitigation of adolescent social anxiety symptoms. Crucially, the results suggest that interventions aimed at reducing intolerance of uncertainty may be beneficial in breaking this vicious cycle during adolescence, particularly for those strategies that compromise adolescents' emotional security and autonomy, such as guilt induction and love withdrawal.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":"2469-2488"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-026-02395-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several prior studies have investigated the within-person bidirectional associations between parental psychological control and adolescent social anxiety, yet the findings remain inconsistent. Furthermore, few studies have differentiated the unique effects of different types of parental psychological control strategies, despite the potential for variations in their associative patterns and underlying mechanisms with adolescent social anxiety. To address these gaps, the present study employed Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Models to separately examine the within-person bidirectional associations between three types of parental psychological control (i.e., guilt induction, love withdrawal, and authority assertion) and social anxiety, as well as the potential mediating role of intolerance of uncertainty. A total of 1,374 Chinese high school students (52.6% girls; Mage = 15.40 years, SD = 0.63) participated in this four-wave longitudinal survey with six-month intervals. The results revealed that all three types of parental psychological control were directly associated with subsequent increases in social anxiety. However, only guilt induction and love withdrawal had an indirect within-person effect on social anxiety via intolerance of uncertainty. Conversely, adolescent social anxiety was directly associated with subsequent increases in love withdrawal and authority assertion, while social anxiety, through an increase in intolerance of uncertainty, predicted only the exacerbation of guilt induction. These findings underscore the importance of reducing all types of parental psychological control in the mitigation of adolescent social anxiety symptoms. Crucially, the results suggest that interventions aimed at reducing intolerance of uncertainty may be beneficial in breaking this vicious cycle during adolescence, particularly for those strategies that compromise adolescents' emotional security and autonomy, such as guilt induction and love withdrawal.

三种父母心理控制与青少年社交焦虑的纵向关系及不确定性不耐受的中介作用。
先前的一些研究已经调查了父母心理控制和青少年社交焦虑之间的双向关系,但结果仍然不一致。此外,很少有研究区分不同类型的父母心理控制策略的独特效果,尽管它们与青少年社交焦虑的关联模式和潜在机制可能存在差异。为了解决这些差距,本研究采用随机截距交叉滞后面板模型,分别考察了三种类型的父母心理控制(即内疚诱导、爱退缩和权威主张)与社交焦虑之间的双向关系,以及不确定性不耐受的潜在中介作用。共1374名中国高中生(52.6%为女生,年龄为15.40岁,SD = 0.63)参加了四波纵向调查,每隔6个月进行一次。结果显示,所有三种类型的父母心理控制都与随后社交焦虑的增加直接相关。然而,只有内疚诱导和爱的退缩通过不确定性的不容忍对社会焦虑有间接的内在影响。相反,青少年社交焦虑与随后爱的退缩和权威主张的增加直接相关,而社交焦虑通过对不确定性的不容忍的增加,只预测了内疚诱导的加剧。这些发现强调了减少所有类型的父母心理控制在缓解青少年社交焦虑症状中的重要性。至关重要的是,研究结果表明,旨在减少对不确定性的不容忍的干预措施可能有助于打破青春期的这种恶性循环,特别是那些损害青少年情感安全和自主性的策略,如内疚诱导和爱的退缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Journal of Youth and Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书