Adhila Fayasari, Ratnayani, Anis Febri Nilansari, Brevi Istu Pambudi
{"title":"Gut microbiota and iron deficiency anemia: Mechanisms, microbial signatures, and dietary interactions (A narrative review).","authors":"Adhila Fayasari, Ratnayani, Anis Febri Nilansari, Brevi Istu Pambudi","doi":"10.6133/apjcn.202608_35(4).0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is one of the most prevalent micronutrient disorders worldwide. Recent work suggests that dysbiosis may not simply be a consequence of low iron status but may actively contribute to impaired absorption. This narrative review synthesizes the evidence on gut microbiota patterns in IDA across age groups, examines the mechanistic links between dysbiosis and iron metabolism, and identifies the potential roles of microbiota-related dietary and therapeutic strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods and study design: </strong>This narrative review used a selective, theory-driven approach, based on targeted searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2005-2026), to synthesize heterogeneous human, experimental, and mechanistic evidence on gut microbiota-iron interactions in iron deficiency anemia (IDA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence suggests a bidirectional, context-dependent relationship between IDA and gut microbiota involving host iron regulation, microbial competition, metabolites, and diet. Individuals with IDA often show reduced microbial diversity, depletion of SCFA-producing taxa, and enrichment of iron-scavenging bacteria, although direct causal evidence in humans remains limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IDA is commonly associated with recurring dysbiosis patterns characterized by reduced short-chain fatty acid-producing commensals and relative enrichment of inflammatory, iron-competitive taxa. While iron supplementation remains the cornerstone of evidence-based IDA management, the ecological effects of unabsorbed luminal iron on gut microbial communities support the concept of a potential \"iron paradox,\" particularly in inflammatory or high-infection settings. Therefore, microbiota-targeted strategies should currently be regarded as hypothesis-generating concepts rather than established clinical interventions and require further mechanism and clinical validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8486,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","volume":"35 4","pages":"589-602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13413138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202608_35(4).0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is one of the most prevalent micronutrient disorders worldwide. Recent work suggests that dysbiosis may not simply be a consequence of low iron status but may actively contribute to impaired absorption. This narrative review synthesizes the evidence on gut microbiota patterns in IDA across age groups, examines the mechanistic links between dysbiosis and iron metabolism, and identifies the potential roles of microbiota-related dietary and therapeutic strategies.
Methods and study design: This narrative review used a selective, theory-driven approach, based on targeted searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2005-2026), to synthesize heterogeneous human, experimental, and mechanistic evidence on gut microbiota-iron interactions in iron deficiency anemia (IDA).
Results: Evidence suggests a bidirectional, context-dependent relationship between IDA and gut microbiota involving host iron regulation, microbial competition, metabolites, and diet. Individuals with IDA often show reduced microbial diversity, depletion of SCFA-producing taxa, and enrichment of iron-scavenging bacteria, although direct causal evidence in humans remains limited.
Conclusions: IDA is commonly associated with recurring dysbiosis patterns characterized by reduced short-chain fatty acid-producing commensals and relative enrichment of inflammatory, iron-competitive taxa. While iron supplementation remains the cornerstone of evidence-based IDA management, the ecological effects of unabsorbed luminal iron on gut microbial communities support the concept of a potential "iron paradox," particularly in inflammatory or high-infection settings. Therefore, microbiota-targeted strategies should currently be regarded as hypothesis-generating concepts rather than established clinical interventions and require further mechanism and clinical validation.
背景和目的:缺铁性贫血(IDA)是世界范围内最常见的微量营养素疾病之一。最近的研究表明,生态失调可能不仅仅是低铁状态的结果,而且可能积极地促进吸收受损。这篇叙述性综述综合了不同年龄组IDA中肠道微生物群模式的证据,研究了生态失调和铁代谢之间的机制联系,并确定了与微生物群相关的饮食和治疗策略的潜在作用。方法和研究设计:本叙述性综述采用选择性的、理论驱动的方法,基于PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science(2005-2026)的目标搜索,综合缺铁性贫血(IDA)中肠道微生物-铁相互作用的异质人类、实验和机制证据。结果:有证据表明,IDA与肠道微生物群之间存在双向、情境依赖的关系,涉及宿主铁调节、微生物竞争、代谢物和饮食。患有IDA的个体通常表现为微生物多样性减少,产生scfa的分类群减少,清除铁的细菌丰富,尽管人类的直接因果证据仍然有限。结论:IDA通常与反复出现的生态失调模式有关,其特征是产生短链脂肪酸的共生菌减少,炎症性、铁竞争性类群相对丰富。虽然补铁仍然是循证IDA管理的基石,但未吸收的肠道铁对肠道微生物群落的生态影响支持了潜在的“铁悖论”概念,特别是在炎症或高感染环境中。因此,针对微生物群的策略目前应被视为假设产生的概念,而不是已建立的临床干预措施,需要进一步的机制和临床验证。
期刊介绍:
The aims of the Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
(APJCN) are to publish high quality clinical nutrition relevant research findings which can build the capacity of
clinical nutritionists in the region and enhance the practice of human nutrition and related disciplines for health
promotion and disease prevention. APJCN will publish
original research reports, reviews, short communications
and case reports. News, book reviews and other items will
also be included. The acceptance criteria for all papers are
the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated,
manuscripts are peer-reviewed by at least two anonymous
reviewers and the Editor. The Editorial Board reserves the
right to refuse any material for publication and advises
that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts
and correspondence as material cannot be returned. Final
acceptance or rejection rests with the Editorial Board