Competitive preordering during planning persists in kinematically fused sequential movements.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-23 DOI:10.1152/jn.00422.2025
Helena Wright-Wieckowski, Jason Friedman, Joseph M Galea, Katja Kornysheva
{"title":"Competitive preordering during planning persists in kinematically fused sequential movements.","authors":"Helena Wright-Wieckowski, Jason Friedman, Joseph M Galea, Katja Kornysheva","doi":"10.1152/jn.00422.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Results in human and nonhuman primates have shown that elements of a movement sequence are preordered in parallel competitively before execution, a process known as competitive queueing (CQ). However, it is unclear whether the preplanning of individual movements persists in continuous skilled actions that involve greater biomechanical integration and is associated with the formation of new motor primitives (neural fusion). We investigated how kinematics impact sequence planning in a handwriting-like task asking whether fusing velocity curves between adjacent movements affects movement preparation. Participants were trained and tested for two days to perform two sequences of four sequential center-out-and-back movements from memory in a delayed sequence production task using a stylus on a Wacom tablet. To manipulate kinematic fusion between subsequent strokes, participants were assigned to one of three groups that were trained to perform the sequences either with acute, right, or obtuse angles between sequential targets. Probe trials assessed the availability of constituent movement elements for fast and accurate execution toward each target during planning. Movement elements associated with later sequence positions were less available than earlier movements, regardless of kinematic fusion, in line with CQ findings for discrete typing sequences in humans. Importantly, a more pronounced CQ gradient was associated with higher fusion, faster initiation, and greater accuracy of sequence production. These findings indicate that kinematically fused sequential actions do not result in the formation of new movement primitives (neural fusion) with a single movement plan. Instead, they continue to be planned separately and are associated with skilled performance.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> When we fluidly string actions together like in cursive handwriting, does the brain fuse those movements into a single, unbreakable unit? By manipulating movement co-articulation (fusion) in a handwriting-like task, we challenge this view. Contrary to the assumption that behavioral fusion reflects the emergence of a singular, novel motor primitive, we demonstrate that even under high levels of kinematic fusion, individual sequence elements remain distinctly represented and competitively preordered based on their sequence position.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"975-992"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00422.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Results in human and nonhuman primates have shown that elements of a movement sequence are preordered in parallel competitively before execution, a process known as competitive queueing (CQ). However, it is unclear whether the preplanning of individual movements persists in continuous skilled actions that involve greater biomechanical integration and is associated with the formation of new motor primitives (neural fusion). We investigated how kinematics impact sequence planning in a handwriting-like task asking whether fusing velocity curves between adjacent movements affects movement preparation. Participants were trained and tested for two days to perform two sequences of four sequential center-out-and-back movements from memory in a delayed sequence production task using a stylus on a Wacom tablet. To manipulate kinematic fusion between subsequent strokes, participants were assigned to one of three groups that were trained to perform the sequences either with acute, right, or obtuse angles between sequential targets. Probe trials assessed the availability of constituent movement elements for fast and accurate execution toward each target during planning. Movement elements associated with later sequence positions were less available than earlier movements, regardless of kinematic fusion, in line with CQ findings for discrete typing sequences in humans. Importantly, a more pronounced CQ gradient was associated with higher fusion, faster initiation, and greater accuracy of sequence production. These findings indicate that kinematically fused sequential actions do not result in the formation of new movement primitives (neural fusion) with a single movement plan. Instead, they continue to be planned separately and are associated with skilled performance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY When we fluidly string actions together like in cursive handwriting, does the brain fuse those movements into a single, unbreakable unit? By manipulating movement co-articulation (fusion) in a handwriting-like task, we challenge this view. Contrary to the assumption that behavioral fusion reflects the emergence of a singular, novel motor primitive, we demonstrate that even under high levels of kinematic fusion, individual sequence elements remain distinctly represented and competitively preordered based on their sequence position.

计划期间的竞争性预购在运动融合的顺序运动中持续存在。
对人类和非人类灵长类动物的研究结果表明,一个运动序列的元素在执行之前是并行竞争的,这个过程被称为竞争排队(CQ)。然而,目前尚不清楚个体运动的预先计划是否在涉及更大的生物力学整合的连续熟练动作中持续存在,并与新运动原语的形成(神经融合)有关。我们研究了运动学如何影响手写任务中的序列规划,询问相邻运动之间的融合速度曲线是否会影响运动准备。参与者接受了为期两天的训练和测试,在延迟序列生产任务中,使用Wacom平板电脑上的手写笔,从记忆中执行两个序列的四个连续的中心前后运动。为了操纵后续中风之间的运动融合,参与者被分配到三组中的一组,这三组接受过训练,可以在顺序目标之间以锐角、直角或钝角执行序列。探针试验评估了在计划期间快速准确地执行每个目标的组成运动元素的可用性。无论运动学融合如何,与后期序列位置相关的运动元素比早期运动更少可用,这与人类离散型序列的CQ研究结果一致。重要的是,更明显的CQ梯度与更高的融合、更快的起始和更高的序列生成准确性相关。这些发现表明,运动融合的顺序动作不会导致单一运动计划形成新的运动原语(神经融合)。相反,它们继续被单独规划,并与熟练的表现相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书