Assessment of the feed additive consisting of zinc chelate of amino acids hydrate (3b606) for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (Zinpro Animal Nutrition (Europe), Inc.).
Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López-Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Giovanna Martelli, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto-Maradona, Katerina Theodoridou, Jaume Galobart, Maria Vittoria Vettori, Paola Manini, Alberto Navarro Villa, Fabiola Pizzo, Piera Valeri
{"title":"Assessment of the feed additive consisting of zinc chelate of amino acids hydrate (3b606) for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (Zinpro Animal Nutrition (Europe), Inc.).","authors":"Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López-Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Giovanna Martelli, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto-Maradona, Katerina Theodoridou, Jaume Galobart, Maria Vittoria Vettori, Paola Manini, Alberto Navarro Villa, Fabiola Pizzo, Piera Valeri","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of zinc chelate of amino acids hydrate as a feed additive for all animal species. The applicant has provided data demonstrating that the additive currently in the market complies with the conditions of authorisation. There is no new evidence that would lead the FEEDAP Panel to reconsider its previous conclusions. Thus, the FEEDAP Panel concludes that the additive remains safe for the target species and consumers. Regarding user safety, the additive is an eye irritant. It is also considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser. Exposure of users by any route is considered a risk and should be minimised. The FEEDAP Panel is not in a position to conclude on the environmental safety of the additive. The conclusions of the forthcoming opinion on the environmental risk assessment of trace elements are expected to be directly applicable to the present assessment and will inform the final evaluation. There is no need to assess the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"24 7","pages":"e10242"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13392917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of zinc chelate of amino acids hydrate as a feed additive for all animal species. The applicant has provided data demonstrating that the additive currently in the market complies with the conditions of authorisation. There is no new evidence that would lead the FEEDAP Panel to reconsider its previous conclusions. Thus, the FEEDAP Panel concludes that the additive remains safe for the target species and consumers. Regarding user safety, the additive is an eye irritant. It is also considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser. Exposure of users by any route is considered a risk and should be minimised. The FEEDAP Panel is not in a position to conclude on the environmental safety of the additive. The conclusions of the forthcoming opinion on the environmental risk assessment of trace elements are expected to be directly applicable to the present assessment and will inform the final evaluation. There is no need to assess the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.
期刊介绍:
The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.