Antonio Gil-Ugidos, María López-Corchón, Gavriella Τsiarleston, Víctor Segura-Jiménez, María Teresa Carrillo-de-la-Peña
{"title":"Transcranial electric stimulation in chronic pain: Effects on quality of life, physical function, activity and clinical status.","authors":"Antonio Gil-Ugidos, María López-Corchón, Gavriella Τsiarleston, Víctor Segura-Jiménez, María Teresa Carrillo-de-la-Peña","doi":"10.1111/jnp.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial electric stimulation represents a promising non-invasive neuromodulatory technique targeting maladaptive nociplastic changes in chronic pain (CP) with analgesic effects. However, its impact beyond pain reduction on broader outcomes such as quality of life (QoL) and physical function remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of two home-based transcranial electric stimulation modalities, using direct (tDCS) or alternating current (tACS), on improving QoL, addressing comorbid symptoms and enhancing physical function and engagement in physical activity in individuals with CP. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 120 CP participants (97 females, 49.5 ± 8.7 years) received 15 sessions of home-based tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1), tACS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), or sham stimulation. A multidimensional assessment was used before, during and after the treatment, combining subjective measures (QoL, mood, fatigue, sleep quality, perceived physical fitness) and objective metrics (field-based physical fitness tests, accelerometry). Compared with the sham group, both active tES modalities significantly improved QoL, with no differences between M1-tDCS (MD=-7.7; p < .001) and DLPFC-tACS (MD=-7.8; p < .001). However, symptom-specific domains showed no differential effects compared with sham (all p > .05). All groups exhibited increased physical activity during the intervention and improvements in physical function after the intervention (p < .001), suggesting the contribution of contextual factors. Our findings highlight the potential of home-based tES to enhance QoL in CP patients. The lack of differences between intervention groups in domain-specific outcomes (mood, fatigue, sleep) and physical activity underscores the complexity of the therapeutic response, likely influenced by neurophysiological, behavioural, and contextual mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.70063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Transcranial electric stimulation represents a promising non-invasive neuromodulatory technique targeting maladaptive nociplastic changes in chronic pain (CP) with analgesic effects. However, its impact beyond pain reduction on broader outcomes such as quality of life (QoL) and physical function remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of two home-based transcranial electric stimulation modalities, using direct (tDCS) or alternating current (tACS), on improving QoL, addressing comorbid symptoms and enhancing physical function and engagement in physical activity in individuals with CP. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 120 CP participants (97 females, 49.5 ± 8.7 years) received 15 sessions of home-based tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1), tACS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), or sham stimulation. A multidimensional assessment was used before, during and after the treatment, combining subjective measures (QoL, mood, fatigue, sleep quality, perceived physical fitness) and objective metrics (field-based physical fitness tests, accelerometry). Compared with the sham group, both active tES modalities significantly improved QoL, with no differences between M1-tDCS (MD=-7.7; p < .001) and DLPFC-tACS (MD=-7.8; p < .001). However, symptom-specific domains showed no differential effects compared with sham (all p > .05). All groups exhibited increased physical activity during the intervention and improvements in physical function after the intervention (p < .001), suggesting the contribution of contextual factors. Our findings highlight the potential of home-based tES to enhance QoL in CP patients. The lack of differences between intervention groups in domain-specific outcomes (mood, fatigue, sleep) and physical activity underscores the complexity of the therapeutic response, likely influenced by neurophysiological, behavioural, and contextual mechanisms.
经颅电刺激是一种很有前途的非侵入性神经调节技术,针对慢性疼痛(CP)的不适应致伤性改变,具有镇痛作用。然而,除了减轻疼痛之外,其对生活质量(QoL)和身体功能等更广泛结果的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估直接(tDCS)或交流电(tACS)两种基于家庭的经颅电刺激方式对改善CP患者生活质量、解决共病症状、增强身体功能和参与体育活动的影响。在一项双盲随机对照试验中,120名CP参与者(97名女性,49.5±8.7岁)在初级运动皮质(M1)上接受了15次基于家庭的tDCS治疗。在背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)上的tACS,或假刺激。在治疗前、治疗中和治疗后采用多维度评估,结合主观测量(生活质量、情绪、疲劳、睡眠质量、感知身体健康)和客观指标(现场身体健康测试、加速度测量)。与假手术组相比,两种活动tES方式均显著改善了患者的生活质量,而M1-tDCS之间无差异(MD=-7.7; p .05)。所有组在干预期间均表现出体力活动增加,干预后身体功能有所改善(p
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including:
• clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups
• behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes
• cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging
• multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science
The following types of paper are invited:
• papers reporting original empirical investigations
• theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data
• review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications
• brief reports and comments
• case reports
• fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors)
• special issues.