Transcranial electric stimulation in chronic pain: Effects on quality of life, physical function, activity and clinical status.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Antonio Gil-Ugidos, María López-Corchón, Gavriella Τsiarleston, Víctor Segura-Jiménez, María Teresa Carrillo-de-la-Peña
{"title":"Transcranial electric stimulation in chronic pain: Effects on quality of life, physical function, activity and clinical status.","authors":"Antonio Gil-Ugidos, María López-Corchón, Gavriella Τsiarleston, Víctor Segura-Jiménez, María Teresa Carrillo-de-la-Peña","doi":"10.1111/jnp.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial electric stimulation represents a promising non-invasive neuromodulatory technique targeting maladaptive nociplastic changes in chronic pain (CP) with analgesic effects. However, its impact beyond pain reduction on broader outcomes such as quality of life (QoL) and physical function remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of two home-based transcranial electric stimulation modalities, using direct (tDCS) or alternating current (tACS), on improving QoL, addressing comorbid symptoms and enhancing physical function and engagement in physical activity in individuals with CP. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 120 CP participants (97 females, 49.5 ± 8.7 years) received 15 sessions of home-based tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1), tACS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), or sham stimulation. A multidimensional assessment was used before, during and after the treatment, combining subjective measures (QoL, mood, fatigue, sleep quality, perceived physical fitness) and objective metrics (field-based physical fitness tests, accelerometry). Compared with the sham group, both active tES modalities significantly improved QoL, with no differences between M1-tDCS (MD=-7.7; p < .001) and DLPFC-tACS (MD=-7.8; p < .001). However, symptom-specific domains showed no differential effects compared with sham (all p > .05). All groups exhibited increased physical activity during the intervention and improvements in physical function after the intervention (p < .001), suggesting the contribution of contextual factors. Our findings highlight the potential of home-based tES to enhance QoL in CP patients. The lack of differences between intervention groups in domain-specific outcomes (mood, fatigue, sleep) and physical activity underscores the complexity of the therapeutic response, likely influenced by neurophysiological, behavioural, and contextual mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.70063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial electric stimulation represents a promising non-invasive neuromodulatory technique targeting maladaptive nociplastic changes in chronic pain (CP) with analgesic effects. However, its impact beyond pain reduction on broader outcomes such as quality of life (QoL) and physical function remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of two home-based transcranial electric stimulation modalities, using direct (tDCS) or alternating current (tACS), on improving QoL, addressing comorbid symptoms and enhancing physical function and engagement in physical activity in individuals with CP. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 120 CP participants (97 females, 49.5 ± 8.7 years) received 15 sessions of home-based tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1), tACS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), or sham stimulation. A multidimensional assessment was used before, during and after the treatment, combining subjective measures (QoL, mood, fatigue, sleep quality, perceived physical fitness) and objective metrics (field-based physical fitness tests, accelerometry). Compared with the sham group, both active tES modalities significantly improved QoL, with no differences between M1-tDCS (MD=-7.7; p < .001) and DLPFC-tACS (MD=-7.8; p < .001). However, symptom-specific domains showed no differential effects compared with sham (all p > .05). All groups exhibited increased physical activity during the intervention and improvements in physical function after the intervention (p < .001), suggesting the contribution of contextual factors. Our findings highlight the potential of home-based tES to enhance QoL in CP patients. The lack of differences between intervention groups in domain-specific outcomes (mood, fatigue, sleep) and physical activity underscores the complexity of the therapeutic response, likely influenced by neurophysiological, behavioural, and contextual mechanisms.

经颅电刺激治疗慢性疼痛:对生活质量、身体功能、活动和临床状态的影响。
经颅电刺激是一种很有前途的非侵入性神经调节技术,针对慢性疼痛(CP)的不适应致伤性改变,具有镇痛作用。然而,除了减轻疼痛之外,其对生活质量(QoL)和身体功能等更广泛结果的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估直接(tDCS)或交流电(tACS)两种基于家庭的经颅电刺激方式对改善CP患者生活质量、解决共病症状、增强身体功能和参与体育活动的影响。在一项双盲随机对照试验中,120名CP参与者(97名女性,49.5±8.7岁)在初级运动皮质(M1)上接受了15次基于家庭的tDCS治疗。在背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)上的tACS,或假刺激。在治疗前、治疗中和治疗后采用多维度评估,结合主观测量(生活质量、情绪、疲劳、睡眠质量、感知身体健康)和客观指标(现场身体健康测试、加速度测量)。与假手术组相比,两种活动tES方式均显著改善了患者的生活质量,而M1-tDCS之间无差异(MD=-7.7; p .05)。所有组在干预期间均表现出体力活动增加,干预后身体功能有所改善(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuropsychology
Journal of Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including: • clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups • behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes • cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging • multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science The following types of paper are invited: • papers reporting original empirical investigations • theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data • review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications • brief reports and comments • case reports • fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors) • special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书