Neighborhood socioeconomic status and adolescent brain responses to peer feedback: Testing relationships with negative and positive affect assessed outside of the lab.

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Development and Psychopathology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-21 DOI:10.1017/S0954579426101722
Brent I Rappaport, James E Glazer, Allison M Letkiewicz, Lilian Y Li, Madeline M McGregor, Sarah E Sarkas, Aishwarya Sritharan, Lili Massac, Katherine Durham, Randy P Auerbach, Stewart A Shankman
{"title":"Neighborhood socioeconomic status and adolescent brain responses to peer feedback: Testing relationships with negative and positive affect assessed outside of the lab.","authors":"Brent I Rappaport, James E Glazer, Allison M Letkiewicz, Lilian Y Li, Madeline M McGregor, Sarah E Sarkas, Aishwarya Sritharan, Lili Massac, Katherine Durham, Randy P Auerbach, Stewart A Shankman","doi":"10.1017/S0954579426101722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is a risk factor for psychopathology. Youth living in low SES neighborhoods experience a myriad of stressors, particularly social stressors (e.g., discrimination), which may be particularly stressful for adolescents sensitive to peer feedback (i.e., blunted sensitivity to acceptance from peers). This study thus aimed to test whether neighborhood SES moderates the relationship between brain responses to peer feedback and affect outside of the lab, measured through ecological momentary assessment (EMA). To measure neural response to acceptance (relative to rejection), 13-18-year-old adolescents (<i>N</i> = 172) completed an event-related potential (ERP) task during which they received accepting or rejecting feedback from peers. They also rated their positive and negative affect via EMA for a week. Neighborhood SES moderated the relationship between brain responses to peer acceptance and negative affect. Specifically, for adolescents living in low SES neighborhoods, blunted brain response to acceptance was related to elevated negative affect. Prevention and intervention efforts (e.g., neighborhood/community interventions) may benefit from focusing on increasing hedonic responses to social feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":11265,"journal":{"name":"Development and Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"1964-1974"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13574269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579426101722","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is a risk factor for psychopathology. Youth living in low SES neighborhoods experience a myriad of stressors, particularly social stressors (e.g., discrimination), which may be particularly stressful for adolescents sensitive to peer feedback (i.e., blunted sensitivity to acceptance from peers). This study thus aimed to test whether neighborhood SES moderates the relationship between brain responses to peer feedback and affect outside of the lab, measured through ecological momentary assessment (EMA). To measure neural response to acceptance (relative to rejection), 13-18-year-old adolescents (N = 172) completed an event-related potential (ERP) task during which they received accepting or rejecting feedback from peers. They also rated their positive and negative affect via EMA for a week. Neighborhood SES moderated the relationship between brain responses to peer acceptance and negative affect. Specifically, for adolescents living in low SES neighborhoods, blunted brain response to acceptance was related to elevated negative affect. Prevention and intervention efforts (e.g., neighborhood/community interventions) may benefit from focusing on increasing hedonic responses to social feedback.

社区社会经济地位和青少年大脑对同伴反馈的反应:在实验室外评估消极和积极影响的测试关系。
较低的社会经济地位(SES)是精神病理的危险因素。生活在低社会经济地位社区的青少年经历了无数的压力源,特别是社会压力源(例如,歧视),这对于对同伴反馈敏感的青少年(例如,对同伴接受的敏感性减弱)来说可能尤其紧张。因此,本研究旨在通过生态瞬时评估(EMA)来测试社区SES是否会调节大脑对同伴反馈和实验室外影响的反应之间的关系。为了测量对接受(相对于拒绝)的神经反应,13-18岁的青少年(N = 172)完成了一项事件相关电位(ERP)任务,在此任务中,他们接受同伴的接受或拒绝反馈。他们还通过EMA对自己一周的积极和消极影响进行了评级。社会经济地位调节了大脑对同伴接纳和消极情绪的反应。具体来说,对于生活在低社会经济地位社区的青少年来说,大脑对接纳的迟钝反应与负面情绪的升高有关。预防和干预工作(例如,邻里/社区干预)可能受益于侧重于增加对社会反馈的享乐反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development and Psychopathology
Development and Psychopathology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
319
期刊介绍: This multidisciplinary journal is devoted to the publication of original, empirical, theoretical and review papers which address the interrelationship of normal and pathological development in adults and children. It is intended to serve and integrate the field of developmental psychopathology which strives to understand patterns of adaptation and maladaptation throughout the lifespan. This journal is of interest to psychologists, psychiatrists, social scientists, neuroscientists, paediatricians, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书