Source-level connectivity and alpha dynamics across attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) clinical presentations.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ruina Sun, Hua Yu, Haixian Wang, Yupeng Wang
{"title":"Source-level connectivity and alpha dynamics across attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) clinical presentations.","authors":"Ruina Sun, Hua Yu, Haixian Wang, Yupeng Wang","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2026.2698088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present research integrated source-localized power envelope connectivity (PEC) with sensor-level individualized alpha frequency (IAF) analysis to identify group-level neurophysiological features that differ between the combined presentation attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD-C) and the predominantly inattentive presentation (ADHD-I) of ADHD. A total of 99 children with ADHD (46 ADHD-I, 53 ADHD-C) and 19 typically developing children were recruited for the study, with resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) data collected from all participants. Source-level analyses showed that differences between ADHD presentations were mainly localized within alpha-band networks, particularly in fronto-occipital, frontoparietal, and attention-related circuits. These effects were frequency-specific and state-dependent, rather than reflecting global connectivity alterations. Sensor-level analyses further revealed differences in alpha-band characteristics between ADHD-I and ADHD-C. Compared with ADHD-I, ADHD-C showed higher parietal individualized alpha peak frequency. Correlation analyses indicated that lower alpha frequency was associated with higher hyperactivity-impulsivity scores in the ADHD-I group. In addition, both presentations exhibited reduced alpha power relative to typically developing controls. These findings highlight regionally distributed differences in alpha oscillatory dynamics between clinically defined ADHD presentations. Overall, the findings indicate that ADHD-I and ADHD-C differ in the organization and modulation of alpha-band networks across resting states, supporting frequency- and network-specific neurophysiological differences between ADHD presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2026.2698088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present research integrated source-localized power envelope connectivity (PEC) with sensor-level individualized alpha frequency (IAF) analysis to identify group-level neurophysiological features that differ between the combined presentation attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD-C) and the predominantly inattentive presentation (ADHD-I) of ADHD. A total of 99 children with ADHD (46 ADHD-I, 53 ADHD-C) and 19 typically developing children were recruited for the study, with resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) data collected from all participants. Source-level analyses showed that differences between ADHD presentations were mainly localized within alpha-band networks, particularly in fronto-occipital, frontoparietal, and attention-related circuits. These effects were frequency-specific and state-dependent, rather than reflecting global connectivity alterations. Sensor-level analyses further revealed differences in alpha-band characteristics between ADHD-I and ADHD-C. Compared with ADHD-I, ADHD-C showed higher parietal individualized alpha peak frequency. Correlation analyses indicated that lower alpha frequency was associated with higher hyperactivity-impulsivity scores in the ADHD-I group. In addition, both presentations exhibited reduced alpha power relative to typically developing controls. These findings highlight regionally distributed differences in alpha oscillatory dynamics between clinically defined ADHD presentations. Overall, the findings indicate that ADHD-I and ADHD-C differ in the organization and modulation of alpha-band networks across resting states, supporting frequency- and network-specific neurophysiological differences between ADHD presentations.

注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)临床表现的源水平连通性和α动态。
本研究将源-局部功率包络连通性(PEC)与传感器水平个体化α频率(IAF)分析相结合,以确定ADHD合并表现型注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD- c)和显性注意力不集中表现型(ADHD- i)之间的群体水平神经生理特征差异。研究共招募了99名ADHD儿童(46名ADHD- i, 53名ADHD- c)和19名正常发育儿童,并收集了所有参与者的静息状态脑电图(EEG)数据。源水平分析表明,ADHD表现之间的差异主要局限于α波段网络,特别是在额枕、额顶叶和注意相关电路中。这些影响是频率特定的和状态相关的,而不是反映全球连接的变化。传感器水平的分析进一步揭示了ADHD-I和ADHD-C之间α波段特征的差异。与ADHD-I相比,ADHD-C表现出更高的顶叶个体化α峰频率。相关分析表明,在ADHD-I组中,较低的α频率与较高的多动冲动性得分相关。此外,与正常发育的对照组相比,这两种表现都表现出较低的α能力。这些发现强调了临床定义的ADHD表现之间α振荡动力学的区域分布差异。总的来说,研究结果表明ADHD- i和ADHD- c在静息状态下α频带网络的组织和调节方面存在差异,这支持了ADHD表现之间频率和网络特异性的神经生理差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书