Remote Teleoperation of Endovascular Intervention Robots: A Systematic Review

IF 4.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Xingyu Chen;Yinchao Yang;Nikola Fischer;Harry Robertshaw;Benjamin Jackson;Mohammad Shikh-Bahaei;Christos Bergeles;Thomas C. Booth
{"title":"Remote Teleoperation of Endovascular Intervention Robots: A Systematic Review","authors":"Xingyu Chen;Yinchao Yang;Nikola Fischer;Harry Robertshaw;Benjamin Jackson;Mohammad Shikh-Bahaei;Christos Bergeles;Thomas C. Booth","doi":"10.1109/TMRB.2026.3681030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote robotic-assisted endovascular intervention offers a promising approach to reduce clinician radiation exposure and physical strain, while extending specialized vascular care to geographically distant regions. Despite advancements, teleoperated endovascular intervention remains underexplored, especially for time-sensitive interventions like mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke. The aim of the current review was to determine the evidence regarding teleoperated endovascular robotic systems, covering technical feasibility, communication infrastructure, and clinical outcomes. The review further identified research gaps and future directions. Following PRISMA guidelines, 16 studies were included that met the inclusion criteria out of 2501 initial search results. We found that teleoperated catheters and guidewires, driven by mechanical or electromagnetic systems, can be navigated across distances up to 7000 km. With robust communication infrastructure, network latency remained within clinically acceptable limits (30-163 ms). Although initial outcomes highlighted 100% procedural success in small-scale human trials, most evidence stemmed from animal or phantom models. Overall, the findings suggest that teleoperated endovascular intervention can reduce occupational hazards, expand patient access to urgent procedures, and optimize resource allocation. Future research should be conducted in low and middle income countries to demonstrate broader geographical access. Ultimately, multi-center clinical trials are required to validate the safety, efficacy, and generalization in diverse clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":73318,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","volume":"8 2","pages":"579-593"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11475205","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11475205/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote robotic-assisted endovascular intervention offers a promising approach to reduce clinician radiation exposure and physical strain, while extending specialized vascular care to geographically distant regions. Despite advancements, teleoperated endovascular intervention remains underexplored, especially for time-sensitive interventions like mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke. The aim of the current review was to determine the evidence regarding teleoperated endovascular robotic systems, covering technical feasibility, communication infrastructure, and clinical outcomes. The review further identified research gaps and future directions. Following PRISMA guidelines, 16 studies were included that met the inclusion criteria out of 2501 initial search results. We found that teleoperated catheters and guidewires, driven by mechanical or electromagnetic systems, can be navigated across distances up to 7000 km. With robust communication infrastructure, network latency remained within clinically acceptable limits (30-163 ms). Although initial outcomes highlighted 100% procedural success in small-scale human trials, most evidence stemmed from animal or phantom models. Overall, the findings suggest that teleoperated endovascular intervention can reduce occupational hazards, expand patient access to urgent procedures, and optimize resource allocation. Future research should be conducted in low and middle income countries to demonstrate broader geographical access. Ultimately, multi-center clinical trials are required to validate the safety, efficacy, and generalization in diverse clinical settings.
血管内介入机器人的远程操作:系统综述
远程机器人辅助血管内介入提供了一种很有前途的方法,可以减少临床医生的辐射暴露和身体压力,同时将专门的血管护理扩展到地理上遥远的地区。尽管取得了进步,但远程手术血管内介入治疗仍未得到充分探索,特别是对急性中风的机械取栓等时间敏感的干预。当前综述的目的是确定关于远程操作血管内机器人系统的证据,包括技术可行性、通信基础设施和临床结果。该综述进一步确定了研究差距和未来方向。按照PRISMA指南,在2501个初始检索结果中纳入了16个符合纳入标准的研究。我们发现,由机械或电磁系统驱动的远程操作导管和导丝可以导航到7000公里的距离。在强大的通信基础设施下,网络延迟保持在临床可接受的范围内(30-163毫秒)。虽然最初的结果强调了在小规模人体试验中100%的程序成功,但大多数证据来自动物或幻影模型。总的来说,研究结果表明,远程血管内介入可以减少职业危害,扩大患者获得紧急手术的机会,并优化资源分配。未来的研究应在低收入和中等收入国家进行,以证明更广泛的地理可及性。最终,需要多中心临床试验来验证在不同临床环境下的安全性、有效性和通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书