Learning from service experience ratings: effects on experience quality, credence quality, and customer satisfaction

IF 8.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Journal of Retailing Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jretai.2025.12.005
Scott Fay, Ali Kozehgaran
{"title":"Learning from service experience ratings: effects on experience quality, credence quality, and customer satisfaction","authors":"Scott Fay,&nbsp;Ali Kozehgaran","doi":"10.1016/j.jretai.2025.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the effects of service experience ratings (SERs) in service industries. SERs are defined as consumers’ assessments of a service encounter (typically on a 3-, 5-, or 10-point numeric scale) that are made immediately after the encounter. We conceptualize SERs as being a mechanism for retailers to observe how much effort employees expend on the provision of experience quality. Using a principal-agent analytical model in which the worker provides credence quality for altruistic reasons and SERs enhance customers’ recognition of the experience quality that is delivered, we investigate whether a retailer should solicit SERs, how SERs influence a worker’s expenditure of effort on experience and credence qualities, and the impact of SERs on customer retention. SERs present a fundamental tradeoff between the benefits from heightened customer satisfaction (which generates future profit) and larger costs (due to monitoring costs and additional compensation to induce the worker to exert more effort). We find that soliciting SERs is profitable for a retailer when the cost of administrating surveys is low, most consumers appreciate the effort workers devote to providing experience attributes, consumers expect a low service quality, and satisfied customers generate high future profit. The nuanced effects of SERs lead to several surprising results. For example, it may be optimal for the retailer to respond to higher expectations about quality by providing a lower-quality service. Also, although SERs only assess experience quality, it is possible that SERs may become more beneficial when consumers highly value credence quality. Another intriguing result is that there are situations in which SERs do not enhance a retailer’s profit even if were costless to collect this information. For example, higher worker altruism may eliminate the incentive to collect SERs and, as a result, lead to fewer customers being satisfied with the service.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing","volume":"102 2","pages":"Pages 353-370"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435925001216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of service experience ratings (SERs) in service industries. SERs are defined as consumers’ assessments of a service encounter (typically on a 3-, 5-, or 10-point numeric scale) that are made immediately after the encounter. We conceptualize SERs as being a mechanism for retailers to observe how much effort employees expend on the provision of experience quality. Using a principal-agent analytical model in which the worker provides credence quality for altruistic reasons and SERs enhance customers’ recognition of the experience quality that is delivered, we investigate whether a retailer should solicit SERs, how SERs influence a worker’s expenditure of effort on experience and credence qualities, and the impact of SERs on customer retention. SERs present a fundamental tradeoff between the benefits from heightened customer satisfaction (which generates future profit) and larger costs (due to monitoring costs and additional compensation to induce the worker to exert more effort). We find that soliciting SERs is profitable for a retailer when the cost of administrating surveys is low, most consumers appreciate the effort workers devote to providing experience attributes, consumers expect a low service quality, and satisfied customers generate high future profit. The nuanced effects of SERs lead to several surprising results. For example, it may be optimal for the retailer to respond to higher expectations about quality by providing a lower-quality service. Also, although SERs only assess experience quality, it is possible that SERs may become more beneficial when consumers highly value credence quality. Another intriguing result is that there are situations in which SERs do not enhance a retailer’s profit even if were costless to collect this information. For example, higher worker altruism may eliminate the incentive to collect SERs and, as a result, lead to fewer customers being satisfied with the service.
从服务体验评级中学习:对体验质量、信任质量和客户满意度的影响
本文研究了服务体验评级(SERs)在服务业中的作用。SERs被定义为消费者对服务体验的评估(通常是3分、5分或10分的数值等级),这些评估是在体验之后立即进行的。我们将SERs概念化为零售商观察员工在提供体验质量上花费了多少努力的一种机制。使用委托代理分析模型,其中员工出于利他的原因提供信任质量,而SERs增强了客户对所交付的体验质量的认可,我们研究了零售商是否应该征求SERs, SERs如何影响员工在体验和信任质量上的努力支出,以及SERs对客户保留的影响。SERs在提高客户满意度(产生未来利润)和更大的成本(由于监控成本和诱导工人付出更多努力的额外补偿)之间的利益之间提出了一个基本的权衡。我们发现,当管理调查的成本较低,大多数消费者欣赏员工为提供体验属性所付出的努力,消费者期望较低的服务质量,满意的客户产生较高的未来利润时,零售商招揽SERs是有利可图的。SERs的微妙影响导致了几个令人惊讶的结果。例如,零售商通过提供较低质量的服务来响应对质量的更高期望可能是最优的。此外,尽管SERs只评估体验质量,但当消费者高度重视可信度质量时,SERs可能会变得更有益。另一个有趣的结果是,在某些情况下,即使收集这些信息没有成本,SERs也不会提高零售商的利润。例如,较高的员工利他主义可能会消除收集SERs的动机,从而导致对服务满意的客户减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The focus of The Journal of Retailing is to advance knowledge and its practical application in the field of retailing. This includes various aspects such as retail management, evolution, and current theories. The journal covers both products and services in retail, supply chains and distribution channels that serve retailers, relationships between retailers and supply chain members, and direct marketing as well as emerging electronic markets for households. Articles published in the journal may take an economic or behavioral approach, but all are based on rigorous analysis and a deep understanding of relevant theories and existing literature. Empirical research follows the scientific method, employing modern sampling procedures and statistical analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书