Trends, advancements, and challenges in climate-smart agriculture: An umbrella review

IF 7.2 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jafr.2026.103088
Ruchie Pathak, Nicholas R. Magliocca
{"title":"Trends, advancements, and challenges in climate-smart agriculture: An umbrella review","authors":"Ruchie Pathak,&nbsp;Nicholas R. Magliocca","doi":"10.1016/j.jafr.2026.103088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) was introduced in 2010 by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization to help maintain the economic, environmental, and social sustainability of farming operations under changing climatic conditions. Since its introduction, CSA has received global recognition, with many nations incorporating its principles into their national policies. Extensive literature evaluates the benefits and effectiveness of agricultural practices in achieving CSA goals and documents the various factors that influence their adoption on farms. However, CSA has also been repeatedly contested, as scholars and experts worldwide have raised concerns about a lack of conceptual clarity, the prioritization of technological solutions, and the neglect of social, financial, and policy measures. Given CSA's rapid development over the past decade, an umbrella review of existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted to provide a comprehensive overview of how CSA has been conceptualized and studied in the scientific literature and to identify remaining gaps to inform future research efforts. The findings reveal inconsistencies in its interpretation; confusion about what constitutes a climate-smart practice or technology; and a tendency to reinforce a sustainable intensification-oriented framing of CSA, as the current scientific discourse pays little attention to farmers, their livelihoods and needs, and other actors and aspects of agriculture. Research needs to go beyond assessing individual agricultural practices or technologies and their effectiveness in meeting CSA goals. Instead, greater emphasis should be placed on participatory approaches that engage diverse stakeholders to co-produce solutions aligned with farmers' needs and prevailing challenges, while simultaneously reducing environmental impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 103088"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154326004588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) was introduced in 2010 by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization to help maintain the economic, environmental, and social sustainability of farming operations under changing climatic conditions. Since its introduction, CSA has received global recognition, with many nations incorporating its principles into their national policies. Extensive literature evaluates the benefits and effectiveness of agricultural practices in achieving CSA goals and documents the various factors that influence their adoption on farms. However, CSA has also been repeatedly contested, as scholars and experts worldwide have raised concerns about a lack of conceptual clarity, the prioritization of technological solutions, and the neglect of social, financial, and policy measures. Given CSA's rapid development over the past decade, an umbrella review of existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted to provide a comprehensive overview of how CSA has been conceptualized and studied in the scientific literature and to identify remaining gaps to inform future research efforts. The findings reveal inconsistencies in its interpretation; confusion about what constitutes a climate-smart practice or technology; and a tendency to reinforce a sustainable intensification-oriented framing of CSA, as the current scientific discourse pays little attention to farmers, their livelihoods and needs, and other actors and aspects of agriculture. Research needs to go beyond assessing individual agricultural practices or technologies and their effectiveness in meeting CSA goals. Instead, greater emphasis should be placed on participatory approaches that engage diverse stakeholders to co-produce solutions aligned with farmers' needs and prevailing challenges, while simultaneously reducing environmental impacts.

Abstract Image

气候智慧型农业的趋势、进步和挑战:概括性综述
气候智慧型农业(CSA)由联合国粮农组织于2010年推出,旨在帮助在不断变化的气候条件下保持农业经营的经济、环境和社会可持续性。自推出以来,CSA已获得全球认可,许多国家将其原则纳入其国家政策。大量文献评估了农业实践在实现CSA目标方面的效益和有效性,并记录了影响农场采用CSA的各种因素。然而,CSA也一再受到质疑,因为世界各地的学者和专家都对缺乏概念清晰度,技术解决方案的优先级以及忽视社会,金融和政策措施表示担忧。鉴于CSA在过去十年中的快速发展,本文对现有的系统综述和荟萃分析进行了综述,以全面概述如何在科学文献中概念化和研究CSA,并确定剩余的差距,为未来的研究工作提供信息。研究结果揭示了其解释的不一致;对什么是气候智能型实践或技术的困惑;由于目前的科学论述很少关注农民、他们的生计和需求以及农业的其他行为者和方面,因此有加强以可持续集约化为导向的CSA框架的趋势。研究需要超越评估个别农业实践或技术及其在实现CSA目标方面的有效性。相反,应该更加强调参与性方法,让不同的利益相关者共同制定符合农民需求和当前挑战的解决方案,同时减少对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
193
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书