Symptom burden in young adult brain tumor survivors: Key intervention targets based on patient-reported outcome network analyses.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology practice Pub Date : 2026-02-25 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1093/nop/npag015
Charlotte Sleurs, Floortje Mols, Laurien De Roeck, Rhodé M Bijlsma, Suzanne E J Kaal, Jacqueline M Tromp, Monique E M M Bos, Tom van der Hulle, Ann Hoeben, Janine Nuver, Mathilde C M Kouwenhoven, Winette T A van der Graaf, Olga Husson
{"title":"Symptom burden in young adult brain tumor survivors: Key intervention targets based on patient-reported outcome network analyses.","authors":"Charlotte Sleurs, Floortje Mols, Laurien De Roeck, Rhodé M Bijlsma, Suzanne E J Kaal, Jacqueline M Tromp, Monique E M M Bos, Tom van der Hulle, Ann Hoeben, Janine Nuver, Mathilde C M Kouwenhoven, Winette T A van der Graaf, Olga Husson","doi":"10.1093/nop/npag015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A brain tumor can lead to functional impairment, which is particularly concerning for adolescents and young adults (AYA). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have typically been examined as isolated domains, rather than as covarying symptoms. This study modeled PRO networks, symptom clustering, and topology among AYA oncology survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient-reported outcome networks from 4005 survivors were compared in topology between survivors of primary CNS tumors (n = 164) and non-CNS tumors (n = 3841). Survivors were diagnosed between 1999 and 2015 at ages 18 to 39 years, who completed the EORTC QLQ-SURV100 (Mdn follow-up = 12.31 years). Group-specific networks were estimated based on 33 health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale scores using graphical LASSO. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and the Network Comparison Test assessed group differences in the original PRO scales and their network centrality, respectively. Within the CNS subgroup (n = 164), associations with tumor-related and treatment-related characteristics were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumors reported higher symptom burden on most PRO scales, along with a more diffuse network showing weaker within-domain cohesion (lower nodal strength and expected influence) and limited cross-domain integration (lower bridge strength). A small subset of nodes showed higher bridge expected influence (ie, fatigue, physical functioning, sexual problems when sexually active, work), which may represent key targets for intervention. Across both groups, negative health outlook, health distress, and physical functioning emerged as consistent core targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Core symptoms may warrant prioritization in clinical follow-up and treatment of cancer survivors. These findings contribute to further development and optimization of tailored neurorehabilitation programs in neuro-oncological care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"13 4","pages":"782-796"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13365141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npag015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A brain tumor can lead to functional impairment, which is particularly concerning for adolescents and young adults (AYA). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have typically been examined as isolated domains, rather than as covarying symptoms. This study modeled PRO networks, symptom clustering, and topology among AYA oncology survivors.

Methods: Patient-reported outcome networks from 4005 survivors were compared in topology between survivors of primary CNS tumors (n = 164) and non-CNS tumors (n = 3841). Survivors were diagnosed between 1999 and 2015 at ages 18 to 39 years, who completed the EORTC QLQ-SURV100 (Mdn follow-up = 12.31 years). Group-specific networks were estimated based on 33 health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale scores using graphical LASSO. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and the Network Comparison Test assessed group differences in the original PRO scales and their network centrality, respectively. Within the CNS subgroup (n = 164), associations with tumor-related and treatment-related characteristics were explored.

Results: Survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumors reported higher symptom burden on most PRO scales, along with a more diffuse network showing weaker within-domain cohesion (lower nodal strength and expected influence) and limited cross-domain integration (lower bridge strength). A small subset of nodes showed higher bridge expected influence (ie, fatigue, physical functioning, sexual problems when sexually active, work), which may represent key targets for intervention. Across both groups, negative health outlook, health distress, and physical functioning emerged as consistent core targets.

Conclusion: Core symptoms may warrant prioritization in clinical follow-up and treatment of cancer survivors. These findings contribute to further development and optimization of tailored neurorehabilitation programs in neuro-oncological care.

青壮年脑肿瘤幸存者的症状负担:基于患者报告结果网络分析的关键干预目标
背景:脑肿瘤可导致功能损害,这在青少年和青壮年(AYA)中尤其值得关注。患者报告的结果(PROs)通常作为孤立的域进行检查,而不是作为共变症状进行检查。本研究模拟了AYA肿瘤幸存者的PRO网络、症状聚类和拓扑结构。方法:对来自4005名幸存者的患者报告的预后网络在拓扑结构上比较原发性中枢神经系统肿瘤(n = 164)和非中枢神经系统肿瘤(n = 3841)的幸存者。在1999年至2015年期间诊断出年龄在18至39岁之间的幸存者,他们完成了EORTC QLQ-SURV100 (Mdn随访= 12.31年)。基于33个与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)量表得分,使用图形LASSO来估计群体特定网络。Wilcoxon秩和检验和网络比较检验分别评估原始PRO量表及其网络中心性的组间差异。在中枢神经系统亚组(n = 164)中,研究了与肿瘤相关和治疗相关特征的关联。结果:中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤幸存者在大多数PRO量表上报告了更高的症状负担,同时更分散的网络显示出较弱的域内凝聚力(较低的节点强度和预期影响)和有限的跨域整合(较低的桥强度)。一小部分节点显示出较高的桥梁预期影响(即疲劳、身体功能、性活跃时的性问题、工作),这可能是干预的关键目标。在这两组中,消极的健康前景、健康困扰和身体功能都是一致的核心目标。结论:癌症幸存者的临床随访和治疗应优先考虑核心症状。这些发现有助于进一步发展和优化神经肿瘤护理中量身定制的神经康复方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书