Exploring electrode montages to optimize the non-invasive clinical recording of auditory evoked AP/wave I

IF 2.3 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.cnp.2026.07.001
Ludivine Beaud-Henry, Aurélien Mulliez, Alann Renault, Katia Bouton, Paul Avan, Fabrice Giraudet
{"title":"Exploring electrode montages to optimize the non-invasive clinical recording of auditory evoked AP/wave I","authors":"Ludivine Beaud-Henry,&nbsp;Aurélien Mulliez,&nbsp;Alann Renault,&nbsp;Katia Bouton,&nbsp;Paul Avan,&nbsp;Fabrice Giraudet","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2026.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Recent advances in electrocochleography (ECochG), particularly the development of minimally invasive ear-canal electrodes, have renewed interest in the objective assessment of auditory disorders such as endolymphatic hydrops, auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders, and cochlear synaptopathy. This study aimed to identify the optimal recording configuration for maximizing compound action potential (AP)/auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I amplitude in normal-hearing adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty-seven normal-hearing young adults (24 women) underwent ABR and ECochG recordings using a conventional clinical evoked-potential system. Six electrode montages combining earlobe, ear-canal, Cz, and Fz electrodes were evaluated. Rarefaction and condensation click stimuli were presented separately. AP/wave I latency and baseline-to-peak amplitude were compared according to recording protocol, electrode montage, click polarity, and sex.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>AP/wave I latency remained stable across recording protocols, electrode configurations, click polarities, and sex. In contrast, AP/wave I amplitude was strongly influenced by recording conditions. Rarefaction clicks consistently produced larger amplitudes than condensation clicks. Ear-canal electrodes significantly enhanced AP/wave I amplitude compared with conventional earlobe electrodes, with amplitude enhancement ratios ranging from 1.40 ± 0.55 to 2.14 ± 1.90. The vertical ear-canal/Fz montage provided the most robust responses in both ABR and ECochG recordings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ECochG recordings obtained with an ear-canal electrode and rarefaction click stimulation optimize AP/wave I amplitude while maintaining a non-invasive and clinically applicable procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Optimized ECochG acquisition with a non-invasive ear-canal electrode enhances the identification and quantification of AP/wave I and may improve the electrophysiological assessment of auditory neuropathy, cochlear synaptopathy, and endolymphatic hydrops in routine clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"11 ","pages":"Pages 543-550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13355502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X26000582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Recent advances in electrocochleography (ECochG), particularly the development of minimally invasive ear-canal electrodes, have renewed interest in the objective assessment of auditory disorders such as endolymphatic hydrops, auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders, and cochlear synaptopathy. This study aimed to identify the optimal recording configuration for maximizing compound action potential (AP)/auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I amplitude in normal-hearing adults.

Methods

Forty-seven normal-hearing young adults (24 women) underwent ABR and ECochG recordings using a conventional clinical evoked-potential system. Six electrode montages combining earlobe, ear-canal, Cz, and Fz electrodes were evaluated. Rarefaction and condensation click stimuli were presented separately. AP/wave I latency and baseline-to-peak amplitude were compared according to recording protocol, electrode montage, click polarity, and sex.

Results

AP/wave I latency remained stable across recording protocols, electrode configurations, click polarities, and sex. In contrast, AP/wave I amplitude was strongly influenced by recording conditions. Rarefaction clicks consistently produced larger amplitudes than condensation clicks. Ear-canal electrodes significantly enhanced AP/wave I amplitude compared with conventional earlobe electrodes, with amplitude enhancement ratios ranging from 1.40 ± 0.55 to 2.14 ± 1.90. The vertical ear-canal/Fz montage provided the most robust responses in both ABR and ECochG recordings.

Conclusions

ECochG recordings obtained with an ear-canal electrode and rarefaction click stimulation optimize AP/wave I amplitude while maintaining a non-invasive and clinically applicable procedure.

Significance

Optimized ECochG acquisition with a non-invasive ear-canal electrode enhances the identification and quantification of AP/wave I and may improve the electrophysiological assessment of auditory neuropathy, cochlear synaptopathy, and endolymphatic hydrops in routine clinical practice.
探索电极蒙太奇优化听觉诱发AP/波I的无创临床记录。
目的:在临床常规中,耳蜗电图(Ecog)的使用引起了人们对新型微创电极(金耳尖电极)的重新关注,该电极可以记录复杂的病理实体,如耳蜗内积液、听神经病变、耳蜗突触病,还可以监测颅内压变化。为了最大限度地减少方法因素造成的差异,本研究旨在比较正常听力成年人(男女)耳垂和耳道电极记录的复合动作电位(AP)/波I振幅以及点击极性(稀薄与凝聚)的影响。结果:所有电生理指标均采用常规临床诱发电位测量系统采集。在听觉脑干反应(ABR)和脑电图记录方案之间,AP/波I潜伏期的结果保持相对稳定,女性的潜伏期更短,极性更稀薄。我们的研究结果支持在ABR和Ecog协议下使用耳道电极;垂直电极蒙太奇和稀薄点击极性始终为男女的AP/波I提供显著更高的振幅。讨论:虽然Ecog长期以来被用于客观诊断和监测内淋巴积液,但Ecog也可用于诊断听神经病变。最近的动物研究结果表明,AP/波I的出现是年龄相关或噪声诱导的耳蜗突触丧失(耳蜗突触病)的敏感指标。因此,有必要优化Ecog方案,以更敏感地评估AP/波I的形态,作为提高对不同病理实体理解的不可或缺的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书