Cognitive trajectories of older adults before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: socioeconomic and psychological disparities in the Lc65+ cohort.

IF 6.2 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2026-05-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igag055
Philippe Voruz, Anthony Nuber-Champier, Yves Henchoz, Gilles Allali, Frederic Assal, Julie A Péron
{"title":"Cognitive trajectories of older adults before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: socioeconomic and psychological disparities in the Lc65+ cohort.","authors":"Philippe Voruz, Anthony Nuber-Champier, Yves Henchoz, Gilles Allali, Frederic Assal, Julie A Péron","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igag055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic and related confinement measures have exacerbated health inequalities and posed unique challenges to cognitive aging. This study examined longitudinal changes in cognitive performance and associated factors before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, using data from the Swiss Lc65+ aging study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses included participants with complete data across 3 assessment waves (2016-2024): 412 participants from Cohort 1 (born 1934-1938), 702 from Cohort 2 (born 1939-1943), and 826 from Cohort 3 (born 1944-1948), with women representing 58%-63% of each cohort. Cognitive performance was measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate changes in cognition and associations with socioeconomic, psychological, behavioral, and nutritional indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant declines in MMSE scores were observed over time in Cohorts 1 and 2 (<i>p</i> < .001), with a smaller but significant reduction in Cohort 3. The prevalence of global cognitive efficiency deficits increased notably in Cohort 1 (16.5%-30.6%) and to a lesser extent in Cohort 2, while remaining stable in Cohort 3. Financial assistance for health insurance was associated with cognitive outcomes in several models, although the direction of this association varied across cohorts. Increases in anxiety and apathy were also observed, particularly following the COVID-19 confinement period.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Findings indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic and confinement period coincided with accelerated cognitive decline and heightened socioeconomic vulnerability among older adults, particularly in the oldest cohort. Results highlight the need for multidimensional public health strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"10 8","pages":"igag055"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13342715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igag055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic and related confinement measures have exacerbated health inequalities and posed unique challenges to cognitive aging. This study examined longitudinal changes in cognitive performance and associated factors before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, using data from the Swiss Lc65+ aging study.

Methods: Analyses included participants with complete data across 3 assessment waves (2016-2024): 412 participants from Cohort 1 (born 1934-1938), 702 from Cohort 2 (born 1939-1943), and 826 from Cohort 3 (born 1944-1948), with women representing 58%-63% of each cohort. Cognitive performance was measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate changes in cognition and associations with socioeconomic, psychological, behavioral, and nutritional indicators.

Results: Significant declines in MMSE scores were observed over time in Cohorts 1 and 2 (p < .001), with a smaller but significant reduction in Cohort 3. The prevalence of global cognitive efficiency deficits increased notably in Cohort 1 (16.5%-30.6%) and to a lesser extent in Cohort 2, while remaining stable in Cohort 3. Financial assistance for health insurance was associated with cognitive outcomes in several models, although the direction of this association varied across cohorts. Increases in anxiety and apathy were also observed, particularly following the COVID-19 confinement period.

Discussion and implications: Findings indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic and confinement period coincided with accelerated cognitive decline and heightened socioeconomic vulnerability among older adults, particularly in the oldest cohort. Results highlight the need for multidimensional public health strategies.

COVID-19大流行前后老年人的认知轨迹:Lc65+队列的社会经济和心理差异
背景与目的:2019冠状病毒病大流行和相关禁闭措施加剧了健康不平等,并对认知衰老构成了独特的挑战。本研究使用瑞士Lc65+老龄化研究的数据,研究了COVID-19大流行前后认知表现和相关因素的纵向变化。方法:分析包括三个评估波(2016-2024)的完整数据的参与者:队列1(1934-1938年出生)412名参与者,队列2(1939-1943年出生)702名参与者,队列3(1944-1948年出生)826名参与者,每个队列中女性占58%-63%。认知表现采用简易精神状态检查(MMSE)进行测量。使用广义估计方程来评估认知变化及其与社会经济、心理、行为和营养指标的关联。结果:随着时间的推移,在队列1和2中观察到MMSE评分显著下降(p < 0.001),在队列3中观察到较小但显著的下降。整体认知效率缺陷的患病率在队列1中显著增加(16.5%-30.6%),在队列2中增加幅度较小,而在队列3中保持稳定。在几个模型中,健康保险的财政援助与认知结果相关,尽管这种关联的方向在不同的队列中有所不同。还观察到焦虑和冷漠的增加,特别是在COVID-19禁闭期之后。讨论和影响:研究结果表明,2019冠状病毒病大流行和禁闭期恰逢老年人认知能力加速下降,社会经济脆弱性加剧,特别是在最年长的人群中。结果突出表明需要制定多层面的公共卫生战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书