Philippe Voruz, Anthony Nuber-Champier, Yves Henchoz, Gilles Allali, Frederic Assal, Julie A Péron
{"title":"Cognitive trajectories of older adults before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: socioeconomic and psychological disparities in the Lc65+ cohort.","authors":"Philippe Voruz, Anthony Nuber-Champier, Yves Henchoz, Gilles Allali, Frederic Assal, Julie A Péron","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igag055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic and related confinement measures have exacerbated health inequalities and posed unique challenges to cognitive aging. This study examined longitudinal changes in cognitive performance and associated factors before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, using data from the Swiss Lc65+ aging study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses included participants with complete data across 3 assessment waves (2016-2024): 412 participants from Cohort 1 (born 1934-1938), 702 from Cohort 2 (born 1939-1943), and 826 from Cohort 3 (born 1944-1948), with women representing 58%-63% of each cohort. Cognitive performance was measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate changes in cognition and associations with socioeconomic, psychological, behavioral, and nutritional indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant declines in MMSE scores were observed over time in Cohorts 1 and 2 (<i>p</i> < .001), with a smaller but significant reduction in Cohort 3. The prevalence of global cognitive efficiency deficits increased notably in Cohort 1 (16.5%-30.6%) and to a lesser extent in Cohort 2, while remaining stable in Cohort 3. Financial assistance for health insurance was associated with cognitive outcomes in several models, although the direction of this association varied across cohorts. Increases in anxiety and apathy were also observed, particularly following the COVID-19 confinement period.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Findings indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic and confinement period coincided with accelerated cognitive decline and heightened socioeconomic vulnerability among older adults, particularly in the oldest cohort. Results highlight the need for multidimensional public health strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"10 8","pages":"igag055"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13342715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igag055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic and related confinement measures have exacerbated health inequalities and posed unique challenges to cognitive aging. This study examined longitudinal changes in cognitive performance and associated factors before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, using data from the Swiss Lc65+ aging study.
Methods: Analyses included participants with complete data across 3 assessment waves (2016-2024): 412 participants from Cohort 1 (born 1934-1938), 702 from Cohort 2 (born 1939-1943), and 826 from Cohort 3 (born 1944-1948), with women representing 58%-63% of each cohort. Cognitive performance was measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate changes in cognition and associations with socioeconomic, psychological, behavioral, and nutritional indicators.
Results: Significant declines in MMSE scores were observed over time in Cohorts 1 and 2 (p < .001), with a smaller but significant reduction in Cohort 3. The prevalence of global cognitive efficiency deficits increased notably in Cohort 1 (16.5%-30.6%) and to a lesser extent in Cohort 2, while remaining stable in Cohort 3. Financial assistance for health insurance was associated with cognitive outcomes in several models, although the direction of this association varied across cohorts. Increases in anxiety and apathy were also observed, particularly following the COVID-19 confinement period.
Discussion and implications: Findings indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic and confinement period coincided with accelerated cognitive decline and heightened socioeconomic vulnerability among older adults, particularly in the oldest cohort. Results highlight the need for multidimensional public health strategies.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.