{"title":"An Affective-Political Theorizing of Backlash to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in Higher Education","authors":"Michalinos Zembylas","doi":"10.1111/edth.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in higher education have become the focal point of intense political and academic contestation. While these developments are frequently described as a “backlash,” the concept of <i>backlash</i> itself has rarely been theorized in education. Drawing on recent affect and political theory, this article offers a conceptual framework for understanding contemporary resistance to DEI initiatives as a distinct form of affective-political mobilization rather than a simple reaction to specific policies. Situating current disputes within a longer history of contestation over liberal educational reforms, the article argues that backlash to DEI operates as an affective-political dynamic shaped by perceptions of elite overreach, loss of voice, and challenges to institutional legitimacy. By applying the lens of backlash politics to higher education, the article illuminates why DEI has become such a charged object of struggle and what this reveals about the limits and tensions of liberal educational projects under conditions of polarization.</p>","PeriodicalId":47134,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","volume":"76 4","pages":"486-505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/edth.70095","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/edth.70095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent years, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in higher education have become the focal point of intense political and academic contestation. While these developments are frequently described as a “backlash,” the concept of backlash itself has rarely been theorized in education. Drawing on recent affect and political theory, this article offers a conceptual framework for understanding contemporary resistance to DEI initiatives as a distinct form of affective-political mobilization rather than a simple reaction to specific policies. Situating current disputes within a longer history of contestation over liberal educational reforms, the article argues that backlash to DEI operates as an affective-political dynamic shaped by perceptions of elite overreach, loss of voice, and challenges to institutional legitimacy. By applying the lens of backlash politics to higher education, the article illuminates why DEI has become such a charged object of struggle and what this reveals about the limits and tensions of liberal educational projects under conditions of polarization.
期刊介绍:
The general purposes of Educational Theory are to foster the continuing development of educational theory and to encourage wide and effective discussion of theoretical problems within the educational profession. In order to achieve these purposes, the journal is devoted to publishing scholarly articles and studies in the foundations of education, and in related disciplines outside the field of education, which contribute to the advancement of educational theory. It is the policy of the sponsoring organizations to maintain the journal as an open channel of communication and as an open forum for discussion.