The Changing Landscape of Supplementary Education in China: Historical Trajectories and Institutional Typologies

IF 5.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Wei Zhang
{"title":"The Changing Landscape of Supplementary Education in China: Historical Trajectories and Institutional Typologies","authors":"Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Since the foundation of the People's Republic of China in 1949, supplementary education has been shaped by three very different paradigms. At the outset were Communist traditions in which China learned from the Soviet Union. Subsequently, these were mixed with, or perhaps subverted by, the market economy; and then the State reasserted itself. Each era had its archetypes, albeit with overlaps. First were forms of public outside-school education institutions, including Palaces for Children and Youth on the Soviet model; second were commercial enterprises offering private supplementary tutoring facilitated by the neoliberal changes; and third were school-based after-school programmes established by the government to combat privately-driven tutoring. Drawing on documentary research and on findings from the author's empirical research since 2010, this article analyses the complex patterns of supplementary education and its governance in China. It begins with a typology of supplementary education before turning to the historical eras. The comparisons over time and across systems expose dynamics that shaped the features of supplementary education in different eras. The article provides perspectives on the changing socio-politics of education, with particular attention not only to tides but also to competing currents.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70712","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the foundation of the People's Republic of China in 1949, supplementary education has been shaped by three very different paradigms. At the outset were Communist traditions in which China learned from the Soviet Union. Subsequently, these were mixed with, or perhaps subverted by, the market economy; and then the State reasserted itself. Each era had its archetypes, albeit with overlaps. First were forms of public outside-school education institutions, including Palaces for Children and Youth on the Soviet model; second were commercial enterprises offering private supplementary tutoring facilitated by the neoliberal changes; and third were school-based after-school programmes established by the government to combat privately-driven tutoring. Drawing on documentary research and on findings from the author's empirical research since 2010, this article analyses the complex patterns of supplementary education and its governance in China. It begins with a typology of supplementary education before turning to the historical eras. The comparisons over time and across systems expose dynamics that shaped the features of supplementary education in different eras. The article provides perspectives on the changing socio-politics of education, with particular attention not only to tides but also to competing currents.

中国补习教育的变迁:历史轨迹与制度类型学
自1949年中华人民共和国成立以来,补习教育形成了三种截然不同的模式。一开始是中国从苏联学习的共产主义传统。随后,这些与市场经济混合在一起,或者可能被市场经济颠覆;然后国家重新确立了自己的地位每个时代都有自己的原型,尽管有些重叠。首先是公立校外教育机构,包括苏联模式的儿童和青年宫;第二种是在新自由主义变革的推动下提供私人补习的商业企业;第三是由政府设立的以学校为基础的课后项目,以打击私人家教。本文结合文献研究和作者自2010年以来的实证研究成果,分析了中国补习教育的复杂模式及其治理。它从补充教育的类型学开始,然后转向历史时代。随着时间的推移和跨系统的比较揭示了在不同时代形成补充教育特征的动态。这篇文章提供了对不断变化的教育社会政治的观点,特别关注的不仅是潮流,还有竞争的潮流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书