{"title":"The Changing Landscape of Supplementary Education in China: Historical Trajectories and Institutional Typologies","authors":"Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Since the foundation of the People's Republic of China in 1949, supplementary education has been shaped by three very different paradigms. At the outset were Communist traditions in which China learned from the Soviet Union. Subsequently, these were mixed with, or perhaps subverted by, the market economy; and then the State reasserted itself. Each era had its archetypes, albeit with overlaps. First were forms of public outside-school education institutions, including Palaces for Children and Youth on the Soviet model; second were commercial enterprises offering private supplementary tutoring facilitated by the neoliberal changes; and third were school-based after-school programmes established by the government to combat privately-driven tutoring. Drawing on documentary research and on findings from the author's empirical research since 2010, this article analyses the complex patterns of supplementary education and its governance in China. It begins with a typology of supplementary education before turning to the historical eras. The comparisons over time and across systems expose dynamics that shaped the features of supplementary education in different eras. The article provides perspectives on the changing socio-politics of education, with particular attention not only to tides but also to competing currents.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70712","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since the foundation of the People's Republic of China in 1949, supplementary education has been shaped by three very different paradigms. At the outset were Communist traditions in which China learned from the Soviet Union. Subsequently, these were mixed with, or perhaps subverted by, the market economy; and then the State reasserted itself. Each era had its archetypes, albeit with overlaps. First were forms of public outside-school education institutions, including Palaces for Children and Youth on the Soviet model; second were commercial enterprises offering private supplementary tutoring facilitated by the neoliberal changes; and third were school-based after-school programmes established by the government to combat privately-driven tutoring. Drawing on documentary research and on findings from the author's empirical research since 2010, this article analyses the complex patterns of supplementary education and its governance in China. It begins with a typology of supplementary education before turning to the historical eras. The comparisons over time and across systems expose dynamics that shaped the features of supplementary education in different eras. The article provides perspectives on the changing socio-politics of education, with particular attention not only to tides but also to competing currents.
期刊介绍:
The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.