Dynamic Road-Network Hybrid Optimization for Vehicle-Based Emergency Evacuation (Case Study: Qom)

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Complexity Pub Date : 2026-06-30 DOI:10.1155/cplx/4292477
Mohammad Ebrahimian, Shahriar Afandizadeh, Ali Naderan
{"title":"Dynamic Road-Network Hybrid Optimization for Vehicle-Based Emergency Evacuation (Case Study: Qom)","authors":"Mohammad Ebrahimian,&nbsp;Shahriar Afandizadeh,&nbsp;Ali Naderan","doi":"10.1155/cplx/4292477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urban evacuation is a typical complex-system problem in which heterogeneous agents, capacity-limited shelters, and time-varying road conditions interact on a large network. This study proposes a hybrid optimization framework for vehicle-based emergency evacuation that combines an exact baseline solved by DOcplex Python with metaheuristic algorithms, namely, GWO, GA, PSO, and SA, to preserve solution quality under both static and dynamic conditions. The model instantiates a multivehicle, multidepot routing setting with two evacuee classes (injured/noninjured), multiple vehicle types (bus-ambulance, bus, minibus), and dual shelter categories (hospital/residential), embedded on a GIS-derived road graph. On a real network from District 8, Qom (Iran), the exact layer delivers the best performance in normal traffic (e.g., mean evacuation time ≈ 79.4 min vs. 85.1–93.8 min for metaheuristics), under crisis conditions involving road closures and counterflow; however, the GWO- and GA-based approaches produce the most effective routes, with evacuation times of approximately 93.4–93.6 min, without requiring full reoptimization. This two-layer design treats evacuation as control on a changing network, balancing optimality (when feasible) with adaptability (when conditions shift), and demonstrates measurable gains in clearance time and operational resilience. The results highlight how hybrid computation and network-aware dynamics can bridge the gap between theoretically optimal routing and real-time decision support in disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":50653,"journal":{"name":"Complexity","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/cplx/4292477","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/cplx/4292477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban evacuation is a typical complex-system problem in which heterogeneous agents, capacity-limited shelters, and time-varying road conditions interact on a large network. This study proposes a hybrid optimization framework for vehicle-based emergency evacuation that combines an exact baseline solved by DOcplex Python with metaheuristic algorithms, namely, GWO, GA, PSO, and SA, to preserve solution quality under both static and dynamic conditions. The model instantiates a multivehicle, multidepot routing setting with two evacuee classes (injured/noninjured), multiple vehicle types (bus-ambulance, bus, minibus), and dual shelter categories (hospital/residential), embedded on a GIS-derived road graph. On a real network from District 8, Qom (Iran), the exact layer delivers the best performance in normal traffic (e.g., mean evacuation time ≈ 79.4 min vs. 85.1–93.8 min for metaheuristics), under crisis conditions involving road closures and counterflow; however, the GWO- and GA-based approaches produce the most effective routes, with evacuation times of approximately 93.4–93.6 min, without requiring full reoptimization. This two-layer design treats evacuation as control on a changing network, balancing optimality (when feasible) with adaptability (when conditions shift), and demonstrates measurable gains in clearance time and operational resilience. The results highlight how hybrid computation and network-aware dynamics can bridge the gap between theoretically optimal routing and real-time decision support in disasters.

Abstract Image

基于车辆紧急疏散的动态路网混合优化(以Qom为例)
城市疏散是一个典型的复杂系统问题,其中异质性agent、容量有限的庇护所和时变的道路条件在一个大网络上相互作用。本研究提出了一种基于车辆紧急疏散的混合优化框架,该框架将DOcplex Python求解的精确基线与元启发式算法(即GWO、GA、PSO和SA)相结合,以保持静态和动态条件下的解决方案质量。该模型实例化了一个多车辆、多站点的路线设置,其中包含两种撤离人员类别(受伤/未受伤)、多种车辆类型(公共汽车-救护车、公共汽车、小巴)和双重庇护所类别(医院/住宅),嵌入在gis派生的道路图中。在伊朗Qom地区8的真实网络中,在涉及道路封闭和车流的危机条件下,精确层在正常交通中提供了最佳性能(例如,平均疏散时间≈79.4分钟,而元启发性疏散时间为85.1-93.8分钟);然而,基于GWO和ga的方法产生了最有效的路线,疏散时间约为93.4-93.6分钟,无需完全重新优化。这种双层设计将疏散视为对不断变化的网络的控制,平衡了最优性(当可行时)和适应性(当条件变化时),并展示了在清除时间和操作弹性方面的可测量收益。结果强调了混合计算和网络感知动力学如何在理论上最优路由和灾害实时决策支持之间架起桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complexity
Complexity 综合性期刊-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
595
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Complexity is a cross-disciplinary journal focusing on the rapidly expanding science of complex adaptive systems. The purpose of the journal is to advance the science of complexity. Articles may deal with such methodological themes as chaos, genetic algorithms, cellular automata, neural networks, and evolutionary game theory. Papers treating applications in any area of natural science or human endeavor are welcome, and especially encouraged are papers integrating conceptual themes and applications that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. Complexity is not meant to serve as a forum for speculation and vague analogies between words like “chaos,” “self-organization,” and “emergence” that are often used in completely different ways in science and in daily life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书