Prospective Tests of the Acquired Preparedness Model for Alcohol and Cannabis Supports Between-Person Associations Among Veterans.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Benjamin L Berey, Rachel L Gunn, Elizabeth R Aston, Brian Borsari, Jane Metrik
{"title":"Prospective Tests of the Acquired Preparedness Model for Alcohol and Cannabis Supports Between-Person Associations Among Veterans.","authors":"Benjamin L Berey, Rachel L Gunn, Elizabeth R Aston, Brian Borsari, Jane Metrik","doi":"10.15288/jsad.26-00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Acquired Preparedness Model (APM) theorizes that psychosocial learning is a mechanism linking impulsive personality traits to various risky behaviors. Prior research on acquired preparedness has predominantly examined between-person associations, enrolled civilian samples, and focused on one behavior (e.g., alcohol use). This secondary analysis used three waves of biannual survey data to test temporal relations among impulsivity, alcohol and cannabis use expectancies, and quantity/frequency among Veterans deployed post-9/11/2001.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Veterans reporting lifetime cannabis use (N=361) completed measures of urgency (UPPS-P), alcohol and cannabis use expectancies, and past-month alcohol and cannabis frequency and quantity at baseline, 6 and 12-months. Four separate Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Models tested between- and within-person associations among urgency, alcohol/cannabis expectancies, and alcohol/cannabis use frequency or quantity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within persons, 6-month alcohol or cannabis expectancies did not mediate associations between baseline urgency and 12-month alcohol or cannabis use indices. Urgency was not associated with positive alcohol or cannabis expectancies at any assessment. Between persons, urgency was associated with more positive alcohol and cannabis expectancies. Positive expectancies were associated with higher use frequency and quantity across both substances, whereas negative expectancies were associated with lower cannabis use frequency and quantity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acquired preparedness may be more applicable to predicting alcohol and cannabis use behaviors between rather than within Veterans over time. Future research should consider how sociocultural factors may impact acquired preparedness among Veterans, and whether these processes unfold differently in relation to substance use outcomes during shorter time periods and across unique developmental stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.26-00019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Acquired Preparedness Model (APM) theorizes that psychosocial learning is a mechanism linking impulsive personality traits to various risky behaviors. Prior research on acquired preparedness has predominantly examined between-person associations, enrolled civilian samples, and focused on one behavior (e.g., alcohol use). This secondary analysis used three waves of biannual survey data to test temporal relations among impulsivity, alcohol and cannabis use expectancies, and quantity/frequency among Veterans deployed post-9/11/2001.

Method: Veterans reporting lifetime cannabis use (N=361) completed measures of urgency (UPPS-P), alcohol and cannabis use expectancies, and past-month alcohol and cannabis frequency and quantity at baseline, 6 and 12-months. Four separate Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Models tested between- and within-person associations among urgency, alcohol/cannabis expectancies, and alcohol/cannabis use frequency or quantity.

Results: Within persons, 6-month alcohol or cannabis expectancies did not mediate associations between baseline urgency and 12-month alcohol or cannabis use indices. Urgency was not associated with positive alcohol or cannabis expectancies at any assessment. Between persons, urgency was associated with more positive alcohol and cannabis expectancies. Positive expectancies were associated with higher use frequency and quantity across both substances, whereas negative expectancies were associated with lower cannabis use frequency and quantity.

Conclusions: Acquired preparedness may be more applicable to predicting alcohol and cannabis use behaviors between rather than within Veterans over time. Future research should consider how sociocultural factors may impact acquired preparedness among Veterans, and whether these processes unfold differently in relation to substance use outcomes during shorter time periods and across unique developmental stages.

获得性准备模型对酒精和大麻支持退伍军人人际关系的前瞻性测试。
目的:获得性准备模型(APM)认为心理社会学习是冲动性人格特质与各种危险行为之间的联系机制。先前关于获得性准备的研究主要是检查人与人之间的联系,登记平民样本,并侧重于一种行为(例如,饮酒)。这项二次分析使用了三波一年两次的调查数据来测试2001年9月11日之后部署的退伍军人的冲动性、酒精和大麻使用预期以及数量/频率之间的时间关系。方法:报告终身大麻使用的退伍军人(N=361)在基线、6个月和12个月时完成了紧急程度(UPPS-P)、酒精和大麻使用预期以及过去一个月酒精和大麻频率和数量的测量。四个独立的随机截距交叉滞后面板模型测试了紧急程度、酒精/大麻预期以及酒精/大麻使用频率或数量之间的人际关系和人际关系。结果:在人群中,6个月的酒精或大麻预期没有调节基线紧迫性与12个月酒精或大麻使用指数之间的关联。在任何评估中,紧急情况与酒精或大麻阳性预期无关。在人与人之间,紧迫感与更积极的酒精和大麻预期有关。积极的预期与两种物质的更高使用频率和数量有关,而消极的预期与更低的大麻使用频率和数量有关。结论:随着时间的推移,获得性准备可能更适用于预测退伍军人之间而不是内部的酒精和大麻使用行为。未来的研究应该考虑社会文化因素如何影响退伍军人的获得性准备,以及这些过程是否在较短的时间内和不同的发展阶段与物质使用结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书