David V Herlihy, John M Chomack, David N Paglia, Charlene Wetterstrand, J Patrick O'Connor, Susan E D'Andrea, Jason T Maikos
{"title":"Development and experimental characterization of a cadaveric stance simulator for residual limb biomechanics.","authors":"David V Herlihy, John M Chomack, David N Paglia, Charlene Wetterstrand, J Patrick O'Connor, Susan E D'Andrea, Jason T Maikos","doi":"10.1088/1873-4030/ae8544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the biomechanical interaction between residual limbs and prosthetic sockets is essential for optimizing prosthesis design and minimizing tissue injury. Existing cadaveric stance simulators have not been specifically designed to examine socket-residual limb biomechanics. This study designed, constructed, and evaluated a cadaveric stance simulator capable of applying physiologically representative compressive forces through residual limbs. The long-term objective is to utilize dynamic stereo x-ray (DSX) to quantify 3D skin strain at the socket-residual limb interface, for which this simulator serves as a critical foundational step. The simulator combined passive spring compression with active stepper motor control to generate characteristic double-peaked vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) profiles of stance phase. Primary validation was performed under idealized conditions using a rigid prosthesis configuration, with cadaveric testing as a secondary feasibility assessment on two residual limbs with direct force plate measurement. Validation metrics included peak vGRF, peak-to-valley (P2V) ratio, first-to-second peak symmetry (P2P), and loading and unloading rates, with target parameters derived from five participants with transtibial limb loss. Non-parametric analyses compared simulator outputs with control data. Spring-based force estimates were validated against force plate measurements using root mean square (RMS) error and Bland-Altman analyses. Idealized trials showed no significant differences across validation metrics, indicating the simulator closely matched selected physiological loading metrics. Exploratory cadaveric comparisons demonstrated lower peak vGRF, P2V ratio, and unloading rates relative to control participants, attributable to intentional force reductions to preserve tissue integrity. Spring-based force estimates demonstrated preliminary agreement with force plate measurements, supported by RMS error and Bland-Altman analysis. The stance simulator provided a repeatable, adaptable platform for physiologically representative residual limb loading. Its compatibility with DSX imaging establishes a foundation for quantifying 3D skin strain at the socket-residual limb interface, supporting improved socket design and outcomes for individuals with lower limb loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1873-4030/ae8544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding the biomechanical interaction between residual limbs and prosthetic sockets is essential for optimizing prosthesis design and minimizing tissue injury. Existing cadaveric stance simulators have not been specifically designed to examine socket-residual limb biomechanics. This study designed, constructed, and evaluated a cadaveric stance simulator capable of applying physiologically representative compressive forces through residual limbs. The long-term objective is to utilize dynamic stereo x-ray (DSX) to quantify 3D skin strain at the socket-residual limb interface, for which this simulator serves as a critical foundational step. The simulator combined passive spring compression with active stepper motor control to generate characteristic double-peaked vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) profiles of stance phase. Primary validation was performed under idealized conditions using a rigid prosthesis configuration, with cadaveric testing as a secondary feasibility assessment on two residual limbs with direct force plate measurement. Validation metrics included peak vGRF, peak-to-valley (P2V) ratio, first-to-second peak symmetry (P2P), and loading and unloading rates, with target parameters derived from five participants with transtibial limb loss. Non-parametric analyses compared simulator outputs with control data. Spring-based force estimates were validated against force plate measurements using root mean square (RMS) error and Bland-Altman analyses. Idealized trials showed no significant differences across validation metrics, indicating the simulator closely matched selected physiological loading metrics. Exploratory cadaveric comparisons demonstrated lower peak vGRF, P2V ratio, and unloading rates relative to control participants, attributable to intentional force reductions to preserve tissue integrity. Spring-based force estimates demonstrated preliminary agreement with force plate measurements, supported by RMS error and Bland-Altman analysis. The stance simulator provided a repeatable, adaptable platform for physiologically representative residual limb loading. Its compatibility with DSX imaging establishes a foundation for quantifying 3D skin strain at the socket-residual limb interface, supporting improved socket design and outcomes for individuals with lower limb loss.
期刊介绍:
Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.