Comparison of three inoculum sources for acetate production and microbial succession in H2/CO2-fed anaerobic system.

IF 4.3 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-02 DOI:10.1007/s00449-026-03381-z
Nana Jiang, Linxiao Li, Xiyan Li, Ruixiang Li, Guoliang Wang, Tian Li, Xin Wang
{"title":"Comparison of three inoculum sources for acetate production and microbial succession in H<sub>2</sub>/CO<sub>2</sub>-fed anaerobic system.","authors":"Nana Jiang, Linxiao Li, Xiyan Li, Ruixiang Li, Guoliang Wang, Tian Li, Xin Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00449-026-03381-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introducing a synthetic H<sub>2</sub>/CO<sub>2</sub> gas mixture into anaerobic systems is a promising strategy for C1 gas valorization, renewable energy storage, and sustainable chemical synthesis. However, systematic comparisons of inoculum sources under identical operational conditions remain limited. In this study, three inoculum sources, fermentation sludge (S1), lake sediment (S2), and brewery anaerobic sludge (S3), were compared for acetate production from CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>, with particular attention to microbial community succession and reactor stability. S3 showed the highest CO<sub>2</sub> consumption rate (331 ± 4 mg CO<sub>2</sub>/(L·d)), cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> fixation (7.8 ± 0.3 g/L), and acetate production efficiency (5.3% electron allocation to acetate), along with stable pH conditions (7.1 ± 0.3). These outcomes were associated with the rapid enrichment of genera that include known homoacetogenic species, mainly Clostridium and Acetobacterium, which together reached approximately 40% relative abundance in S3 after acclimation. The findings suggest that initial inoculum composition can influence the extent of homoacetogen enrichment and subsequent acetate production performance. In addition, the post-peak increase in the acetate-oxidizing genus Geobacter (an acetate consumer rather than an acetogen) in S3 points to a potential challenge for sustained product recovery in mixed-culture systems. Overall, these results provide insights for inoculum selection and process optimization in H<sub>2</sub>/CO<sub>2</sub> fermentation systems for acetate production.</p>","PeriodicalId":9024,"journal":{"name":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"2133-2145"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-026-03381-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introducing a synthetic H2/CO2 gas mixture into anaerobic systems is a promising strategy for C1 gas valorization, renewable energy storage, and sustainable chemical synthesis. However, systematic comparisons of inoculum sources under identical operational conditions remain limited. In this study, three inoculum sources, fermentation sludge (S1), lake sediment (S2), and brewery anaerobic sludge (S3), were compared for acetate production from CO2 and H2, with particular attention to microbial community succession and reactor stability. S3 showed the highest CO2 consumption rate (331 ± 4 mg CO2/(L·d)), cumulative CO2 fixation (7.8 ± 0.3 g/L), and acetate production efficiency (5.3% electron allocation to acetate), along with stable pH conditions (7.1 ± 0.3). These outcomes were associated with the rapid enrichment of genera that include known homoacetogenic species, mainly Clostridium and Acetobacterium, which together reached approximately 40% relative abundance in S3 after acclimation. The findings suggest that initial inoculum composition can influence the extent of homoacetogen enrichment and subsequent acetate production performance. In addition, the post-peak increase in the acetate-oxidizing genus Geobacter (an acetate consumer rather than an acetogen) in S3 points to a potential challenge for sustained product recovery in mixed-culture systems. Overall, these results provide insights for inoculum selection and process optimization in H2/CO2 fermentation systems for acetate production.

三种接种源对H2/ co2厌氧系统中乙酸生成及微生物演替的比较。
在厌氧系统中引入合成H2/CO2气体混合物是C1气体增值、可再生能源储存和可持续化学合成的一种有前途的策略。然而,在相同操作条件下对接种源的系统比较仍然有限。本研究比较了发酵污泥(S1)、湖泊沉积物(S2)和啤酒厂厌氧污泥(S3)三种接种源对CO2和H2产醋酸的影响,并特别关注了微生物群落演替和反应器稳定性。S3表现出最高的CO2消耗速率(331±4 mg CO2/(L·d))、累积CO2固定速率(7.8±0.3 g/L)和醋酸酯生产效率(5.3%的电子分配给醋酸酯),且pH条件稳定(7.1±0.3)。这些结果与包括已知的同质产醋种(主要是Clostridium和Acetobacterium)在内的属的快速富集有关,驯化后它们在S3中的相对丰度总计达到约40%。综上所述,初始接种量的组成会影响同质乙酸的富集程度和随后的乙酸生产性能。此外,S3中醋酸氧化属Geobacter(醋酸消耗者而非醋酸原)的峰后增加表明,混合培养系统中持续产品回收存在潜在挑战。总的来说,这些结果为H2/CO2发酵系统的接种物选择和工艺优化提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
147
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering provides an international peer-reviewed forum to facilitate the discussion between engineering and biological science to find efficient solutions in the development and improvement of bioprocesses. The aim of the journal is to focus more attention on the multidisciplinary approaches for integrative bioprocess design. Of special interest are the rational manipulation of biosystems through metabolic engineering techniques to provide new biocatalysts as well as the model based design of bioprocesses (up-stream processing, bioreactor operation and downstream processing) that will lead to new and sustainable production processes. Contributions are targeted at new approaches for rational and evolutive design of cellular systems by taking into account the environment and constraints of technical production processes, integration of recombinant technology and process design, as well as new hybrid intersections such as bioinformatics and process systems engineering. Manuscripts concerning the design, simulation, experimental validation, control, and economic as well as ecological evaluation of novel processes using biosystems or parts thereof (e.g., enzymes, microorganisms, mammalian cells, plant cells, or tissue), their related products, or technical devices are also encouraged. The Editors will consider papers for publication based on novelty, their impact on biotechnological production and their contribution to the advancement of bioprocess and biosystems engineering science. Submission of papers dealing with routine aspects of bioprocess engineering (e.g., routine application of established methodologies, and description of established equipment) are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书