{"title":"Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area in classifying ulnar neuropathy at the elbow","authors":"Nathan J. Savage, John S. McKell","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2026.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is a common entrapment neuropathy for which electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing is frequently used. Although multi-tiered electrophysiologic severity classifications exist, the extent to which ultrasound imaging (USI)-derived ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) provides incremental discrimination across severity categories and informs probabilistic clinical decision-making remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected cross-sectional data included 299 elbows from 262 patients referred for EDX testing with clinical suspicion of UNE. Elbows were classified using two multi-tiered electrophysiologic systems (Padua and Zeidman) and consolidated binary categorizations (Negative vs UNE). USI-derived ulnar nerve CSA was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analyses and likelihood ratios to estimate post-test probability shifts across severity categories and binary classifications, accounting for clustering of bilateral elbows.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CSA demonstrated limited incremental discrimination between adjacent categories within multi-tiered electrophysiologic classifications, resulting in modest post-test probability shifts. In contrast, binary categorizations showed stronger discriminative performance. CSA values <6 mm<sup>2</sup> identified a low probability, whereas values >15–16 mm<sup>2</sup> identified a high probability of electrophysiologic abnormality suggesting UNE. Thresholds derived from Youden's index (≤8 mm<sup>2</sup> and ≥ 9 mm<sup>2</sup>) produced smaller, non-conclusive probability shifts. Age and sex influenced electrophysiologic findings but did not materially alter CSA-based probabilistic interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>USI-derived ulnar nerve CSA does not reliably discriminate between adjacent electrophysiologic severity categories of UNE. A simplified binary interpretive framework using CSA thresholds may offer greater clinical utility.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>These findings support probabilistic, rather than severity-grading, use of USI when evaluating suspected UNE in patients referred for EDX testing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"11 ","pages":"Pages 434-441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13293735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X26000430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is a common entrapment neuropathy for which electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing is frequently used. Although multi-tiered electrophysiologic severity classifications exist, the extent to which ultrasound imaging (USI)-derived ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) provides incremental discrimination across severity categories and informs probabilistic clinical decision-making remains unclear.
Methods
This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected cross-sectional data included 299 elbows from 262 patients referred for EDX testing with clinical suspicion of UNE. Elbows were classified using two multi-tiered electrophysiologic systems (Padua and Zeidman) and consolidated binary categorizations (Negative vs UNE). USI-derived ulnar nerve CSA was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analyses and likelihood ratios to estimate post-test probability shifts across severity categories and binary classifications, accounting for clustering of bilateral elbows.
Results
CSA demonstrated limited incremental discrimination between adjacent categories within multi-tiered electrophysiologic classifications, resulting in modest post-test probability shifts. In contrast, binary categorizations showed stronger discriminative performance. CSA values <6 mm2 identified a low probability, whereas values >15–16 mm2 identified a high probability of electrophysiologic abnormality suggesting UNE. Thresholds derived from Youden's index (≤8 mm2 and ≥ 9 mm2) produced smaller, non-conclusive probability shifts. Age and sex influenced electrophysiologic findings but did not materially alter CSA-based probabilistic interpretation.
Conclusions
USI-derived ulnar nerve CSA does not reliably discriminate between adjacent electrophysiologic severity categories of UNE. A simplified binary interpretive framework using CSA thresholds may offer greater clinical utility.
Significance
These findings support probabilistic, rather than severity-grading, use of USI when evaluating suspected UNE in patients referred for EDX testing.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.