Psychosocial outcomes of reproductive genetic carrier screening up to five years post-result.

IF 4.6 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Erin Tutty, Alison D Archibald, Belinda J Dawson-McClaren, Cameron Patrick, Martin B Delatycki, Sharon Lewis
{"title":"Psychosocial outcomes of reproductive genetic carrier screening up to five years post-result.","authors":"Erin Tutty, Alison D Archibald, Belinda J Dawson-McClaren, Cameron Patrick, Martin B Delatycki, Sharon Lewis","doi":"10.1038/s41431-026-02167-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The long-term psychosocial outcomes of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) have yet to be adequately quantified. We examined long-term psychosocial outcomes of RGCS within the Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project ('Mackenzie's Mission'), where 9107 reproductive couples had RGCS for ~1300 genes and 175 (1.9%) received a new increased chance result. We administered a survey at approximately three to five years (mean = 3.7) post-result, capturing attitudes toward the result, state anxiety (using the STAI-6) and decision regret for all participants, plus empowerment and decisional conflict for participants with an increased chance result. Using STAI-6 data from previous surveys, we used linear mixed models to examine change in state anxiety over time. Participants with a low chance result (n = 2512) had low state anxiety, minimal decision regret and felt reassured by their result. For participants with an increased chance result (n = 86), increased state anxiety after result disclosure gradually decreased, almost returning to baseline by 3-5 years post-result. This group also had high empowerment, minimal decision regret, low decisional conflict regarding reproductive choices and positive attitudes about the utility of their increased chance result. Predictors of clinically meaningful state anxiety at 3-5 years post-result were: having an increased chance result, higher trait anxiety and having a child with a medical condition/disability. Findings highlight that large-panel RGCS is valuable for reproductive planning. Elevated state anxiety after increased chance result disclosure aligns with other reproductive genetic screening and decreases over time. It is important that RGCS programmes provide appropriate, longitudinal psychosocial support to promote the reproductive empowerment of all who participate.</p>","PeriodicalId":12016,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02167-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The long-term psychosocial outcomes of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) have yet to be adequately quantified. We examined long-term psychosocial outcomes of RGCS within the Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project ('Mackenzie's Mission'), where 9107 reproductive couples had RGCS for ~1300 genes and 175 (1.9%) received a new increased chance result. We administered a survey at approximately three to five years (mean = 3.7) post-result, capturing attitudes toward the result, state anxiety (using the STAI-6) and decision regret for all participants, plus empowerment and decisional conflict for participants with an increased chance result. Using STAI-6 data from previous surveys, we used linear mixed models to examine change in state anxiety over time. Participants with a low chance result (n = 2512) had low state anxiety, minimal decision regret and felt reassured by their result. For participants with an increased chance result (n = 86), increased state anxiety after result disclosure gradually decreased, almost returning to baseline by 3-5 years post-result. This group also had high empowerment, minimal decision regret, low decisional conflict regarding reproductive choices and positive attitudes about the utility of their increased chance result. Predictors of clinically meaningful state anxiety at 3-5 years post-result were: having an increased chance result, higher trait anxiety and having a child with a medical condition/disability. Findings highlight that large-panel RGCS is valuable for reproductive planning. Elevated state anxiety after increased chance result disclosure aligns with other reproductive genetic screening and decreases over time. It is important that RGCS programmes provide appropriate, longitudinal psychosocial support to promote the reproductive empowerment of all who participate.

生殖基因携带者筛查后5年的社会心理结果。
生殖遗传携带者筛查(RGCS)的长期社会心理结果尚未得到充分量化。我们在澳大利亚生殖遗传载体筛查项目(“Mackenzie’s Mission”)中检查了RGCS的长期社会心理结果,其中9107对生殖夫妇有大约1300个基因的RGCS, 175对(1.9%)获得了新的增加的机会结果。我们在结果后大约三到五年(平均= 3.7)进行了一项调查,收集了所有参与者对结果的态度、状态焦虑(使用STAI-6)和决策后悔,以及对结果可能性增加的参与者的授权和决策冲突。使用之前调查的STAI-6数据,我们使用线性混合模型来检查状态焦虑随时间的变化。低概率结果的参与者(n = 2512)的状态焦虑程度较低,决策后悔程度最低,并且对结果感到放心。对于机会结果增加的参与者(n = 86),结果披露后增加的状态焦虑逐渐减少,结果后3-5年几乎恢复到基线。这一群体在生育选择方面也有很高的自主权,最小的决策后悔,较少的决策冲突,对增加的机会结果的效用持积极态度。结果3-5年后临床有意义的状态焦虑的预测因素是:有增加的机会结果,更高的特质焦虑和有一个医疗条件/残疾的孩子。研究结果强调,大面板RGCS对生育计划是有价值的。结果披露增加后的状态焦虑升高与其他生殖基因筛查一致,并随着时间的推移而降低。重要的是,RGCS方案提供适当的纵向社会心理支持,以促进所有参与者的生殖能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Human Genetics
European Journal of Human Genetics 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
216
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Human Genetics is the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics, publishing high-quality, original research papers, short reports and reviews in the rapidly expanding field of human genetics and genomics. It covers molecular, clinical and cytogenetics, interfacing between advanced biomedical research and the clinician, and bridging the great diversity of facilities, resources and viewpoints in the genetics community. Key areas include: -Monogenic and multifactorial disorders -Development and malformation -Hereditary cancer -Medical Genomics -Gene mapping and functional studies -Genotype-phenotype correlations -Genetic variation and genome diversity -Statistical and computational genetics -Bioinformatics -Advances in diagnostics -Therapy and prevention -Animal models -Genetic services -Community genetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书