Erin Tutty, Alison D Archibald, Belinda J Dawson-McClaren, Cameron Patrick, Martin B Delatycki, Sharon Lewis
{"title":"Psychosocial outcomes of reproductive genetic carrier screening up to five years post-result.","authors":"Erin Tutty, Alison D Archibald, Belinda J Dawson-McClaren, Cameron Patrick, Martin B Delatycki, Sharon Lewis","doi":"10.1038/s41431-026-02167-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The long-term psychosocial outcomes of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) have yet to be adequately quantified. We examined long-term psychosocial outcomes of RGCS within the Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project ('Mackenzie's Mission'), where 9107 reproductive couples had RGCS for ~1300 genes and 175 (1.9%) received a new increased chance result. We administered a survey at approximately three to five years (mean = 3.7) post-result, capturing attitudes toward the result, state anxiety (using the STAI-6) and decision regret for all participants, plus empowerment and decisional conflict for participants with an increased chance result. Using STAI-6 data from previous surveys, we used linear mixed models to examine change in state anxiety over time. Participants with a low chance result (n = 2512) had low state anxiety, minimal decision regret and felt reassured by their result. For participants with an increased chance result (n = 86), increased state anxiety after result disclosure gradually decreased, almost returning to baseline by 3-5 years post-result. This group also had high empowerment, minimal decision regret, low decisional conflict regarding reproductive choices and positive attitudes about the utility of their increased chance result. Predictors of clinically meaningful state anxiety at 3-5 years post-result were: having an increased chance result, higher trait anxiety and having a child with a medical condition/disability. Findings highlight that large-panel RGCS is valuable for reproductive planning. Elevated state anxiety after increased chance result disclosure aligns with other reproductive genetic screening and decreases over time. It is important that RGCS programmes provide appropriate, longitudinal psychosocial support to promote the reproductive empowerment of all who participate.</p>","PeriodicalId":12016,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02167-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The long-term psychosocial outcomes of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) have yet to be adequately quantified. We examined long-term psychosocial outcomes of RGCS within the Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project ('Mackenzie's Mission'), where 9107 reproductive couples had RGCS for ~1300 genes and 175 (1.9%) received a new increased chance result. We administered a survey at approximately three to five years (mean = 3.7) post-result, capturing attitudes toward the result, state anxiety (using the STAI-6) and decision regret for all participants, plus empowerment and decisional conflict for participants with an increased chance result. Using STAI-6 data from previous surveys, we used linear mixed models to examine change in state anxiety over time. Participants with a low chance result (n = 2512) had low state anxiety, minimal decision regret and felt reassured by their result. For participants with an increased chance result (n = 86), increased state anxiety after result disclosure gradually decreased, almost returning to baseline by 3-5 years post-result. This group also had high empowerment, minimal decision regret, low decisional conflict regarding reproductive choices and positive attitudes about the utility of their increased chance result. Predictors of clinically meaningful state anxiety at 3-5 years post-result were: having an increased chance result, higher trait anxiety and having a child with a medical condition/disability. Findings highlight that large-panel RGCS is valuable for reproductive planning. Elevated state anxiety after increased chance result disclosure aligns with other reproductive genetic screening and decreases over time. It is important that RGCS programmes provide appropriate, longitudinal psychosocial support to promote the reproductive empowerment of all who participate.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Human Genetics is the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics, publishing high-quality, original research papers, short reports and reviews in the rapidly expanding field of human genetics and genomics. It covers molecular, clinical and cytogenetics, interfacing between advanced biomedical research and the clinician, and bridging the great diversity of facilities, resources and viewpoints in the genetics community.
Key areas include:
-Monogenic and multifactorial disorders
-Development and malformation
-Hereditary cancer
-Medical Genomics
-Gene mapping and functional studies
-Genotype-phenotype correlations
-Genetic variation and genome diversity
-Statistical and computational genetics
-Bioinformatics
-Advances in diagnostics
-Therapy and prevention
-Animal models
-Genetic services
-Community genetics