Co-developing implementation strategies to support STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) for older adult fall prevention in outpatient physical therapy.

IF 6.2 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2026-04-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igag036
Jennifer L Vincenzo, Sarah K Council, Mariana Wingood, Aaron J Scott, Jamie M Caulley, Emily Kocurek, Jennifer S Brach, Geoffrey M Curran
{"title":"Co-developing implementation strategies to support STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) for older adult fall prevention in outpatient physical therapy.","authors":"Jennifer L Vincenzo, Sarah K Council, Mariana Wingood, Aaron J Scott, Jamie M Caulley, Emily Kocurek, Jennifer S Brach, Geoffrey M Curran","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igag036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) is an approach to co-develop implementation strategies with implementation partners. This study describes an EBQI approach for co-developing implementation strategies to support the adoption of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) falls prevention initiative in outpatient physical therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary panel (<i>n </i>= 10), representing key partner groups including physical therapists, clinic managers, a referring physician, an older adult with prior physical therapy experience, and a caregiver, collaborated with a research team across 5 outpatient physical therapy clinics within a U.S. health system. Eight virtual EBQI panel sessions conducted over 9 months included meetings, barriers/facilitator ranking, strategy identification/rating, concept mapping, consensus building, and group discussion. Strategies were evaluated on feasibility and importance using Likert-scale surveys and iteratively refined. The main outcome measures were partner-rated rankings of barriers and facilitators to address implementation challenges, rankings of strategy feasibility and importance, and a finalized package of tailored implementation strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty barriers and 20 facilitators were prioritized and ranked by each partner group. Prioritized barriers were matched with prioritized facilitators and/or implementation strategies to address barriers. Of the 78 implementation strategies considered, 39 unique specifications from 22 strategies were identified. Key strategies included clinician education, workflow and electronic health record integration, clinician and older adult-facing materials, clinic champions, and communication templates.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>EBQI effectively engaged implementation partners in identifying and prioritizing barriers, facilitators, and co-developing tailored, actionable implementation strategies to support STEADI adoption in outpatient physical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"10 7","pages":"igag036"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13284997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igag036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) is an approach to co-develop implementation strategies with implementation partners. This study describes an EBQI approach for co-developing implementation strategies to support the adoption of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) falls prevention initiative in outpatient physical therapy.

Methods: A multidisciplinary panel (n = 10), representing key partner groups including physical therapists, clinic managers, a referring physician, an older adult with prior physical therapy experience, and a caregiver, collaborated with a research team across 5 outpatient physical therapy clinics within a U.S. health system. Eight virtual EBQI panel sessions conducted over 9 months included meetings, barriers/facilitator ranking, strategy identification/rating, concept mapping, consensus building, and group discussion. Strategies were evaluated on feasibility and importance using Likert-scale surveys and iteratively refined. The main outcome measures were partner-rated rankings of barriers and facilitators to address implementation challenges, rankings of strategy feasibility and importance, and a finalized package of tailored implementation strategies.

Results: Twenty barriers and 20 facilitators were prioritized and ranked by each partner group. Prioritized barriers were matched with prioritized facilitators and/or implementation strategies to address barriers. Of the 78 implementation strategies considered, 39 unique specifications from 22 strategies were identified. Key strategies included clinician education, workflow and electronic health record integration, clinician and older adult-facing materials, clinic champions, and communication templates.

Discussion and implications: EBQI effectively engaged implementation partners in identifying and prioritizing barriers, facilitators, and co-developing tailored, actionable implementation strategies to support STEADI adoption in outpatient physical therapy.

共同制定实施策略,支持在门诊物理治疗中预防老年人跌倒的STEADI(停止老年人事故、死亡和伤害)。
背景和目标:基于证据的质量改进(EBQI)是一种与实施伙伴共同制定实施战略的方法。本研究描述了一种EBQI方法,用于共同制定实施策略,以支持在门诊物理治疗中采用疾病控制和预防中心的“停止老年人事故、死亡和伤害(STEADI)跌倒预防倡议”。方法:一个多学科小组(n = 10),代表主要合作伙伴群体,包括物理治疗师、诊所经理、一名转诊医生、一名有物理治疗经验的老年人和一名护理人员,与美国卫生系统内5家门诊物理治疗诊所的研究小组合作。在9个月的时间里进行了8次虚拟EBQI小组会议,包括会议、障碍/促进者排名、战略确定/评级、概念映射、共识建立和小组讨论。使用李克特量表调查评估策略的可行性和重要性,并进行迭代改进。主要的成果衡量指标是合作伙伴对应对实施挑战的障碍和促进因素进行的排名,对战略可行性和重要性进行的排名,以及最终确定的一揽子量身定制的实施战略。结果:各合作伙伴组对20个障碍和20个促进者进行了优先排序。优先障碍与优先促进者和/或解决障碍的实施战略相匹配。在考虑的78个实施策略中,确定了来自22个策略的39个独特规范。关键策略包括临床医生教育、工作流程和电子健康记录集成、面向临床医生和老年人的材料、临床冠军和通信模板。讨论和影响:EBQI有效地让实施伙伴参与识别和优先考虑障碍、促进因素,并共同制定量身定制的、可操作的实施策略,以支持门诊物理治疗采用STEADI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书