Cognitive profiles in psychosis: comparing those experiencing uni- or multisensory versus multimodal hallucinations.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Cognitive Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1080/13546805.2026.2689331
Wei Lin Toh, Mikaela Bere, Adrienne Bell, Susan Lee Rossell
{"title":"Cognitive profiles in psychosis: comparing those experiencing uni- or multisensory versus multimodal hallucinations.","authors":"Wei Lin Toh, Mikaela Bere, Adrienne Bell, Susan Lee Rossell","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2026.2689331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> A vast body of cognitive research in psychosis has focused on auditory hallucinations, though more recent studies are turning towards other sensory modalities. This study aimed to compare the cognitive profile of persons experiencing uni- or multisensory versus multimodal hallucinations.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Participants with primary diagnosis of a psychotic disorder were subdivided into those experiencing uni- or multisensory (UMS; <i>n </i>= 31) versus multimodal (MM; <i>n </i>= 28) hallucinations relative to non-clinical controls (NC; <i>n </i>= 32). Cognitive assessment comprised the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, supplemented by a Colour Word Interference Test. Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) and correlation analyses were performed.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> The UMS and MM groups performed significantly worse than the NC group on some cognitive domains (i.e. speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning), but not others (i.e. reasoning and problem-solving, social cognition). For visual learning, the MM group performed significantly worse than the NC group only, whereas for inhibition, the UMS group performed significantly worse than the NC group only.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> A novel cognitive profile associated with multimodal hallucinations was documented. Dissociation between performance of the two clinical groups on visual learning and inhibition suggests these cognitive domains may be of relevance to hallucinations, pending further investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"132-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2026.2689331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A vast body of cognitive research in psychosis has focused on auditory hallucinations, though more recent studies are turning towards other sensory modalities. This study aimed to compare the cognitive profile of persons experiencing uni- or multisensory versus multimodal hallucinations.

Methods: Participants with primary diagnosis of a psychotic disorder were subdivided into those experiencing uni- or multisensory (UMS; n = 31) versus multimodal (MM; n = 28) hallucinations relative to non-clinical controls (NC; n = 32). Cognitive assessment comprised the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, supplemented by a Colour Word Interference Test. Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) and correlation analyses were performed.

Results: The UMS and MM groups performed significantly worse than the NC group on some cognitive domains (i.e. speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning), but not others (i.e. reasoning and problem-solving, social cognition). For visual learning, the MM group performed significantly worse than the NC group only, whereas for inhibition, the UMS group performed significantly worse than the NC group only.

Conclusion: A novel cognitive profile associated with multimodal hallucinations was documented. Dissociation between performance of the two clinical groups on visual learning and inhibition suggests these cognitive domains may be of relevance to hallucinations, pending further investigations.

精神病的认知概况:比较那些经历单一或多感觉与多模态幻觉的人。
导读:大量的精神病认知研究集中在幻听上,尽管最近的研究转向了其他感觉模式。本研究旨在比较经历单或多感官幻觉与多模态幻觉的人的认知概况。方法:初步诊断为精神障碍的参与者被细分为相对于非临床对照(NC, n = 32)有单或多感觉幻觉(UMS, n = 31)和多感觉幻觉(MM, n = 28)。认知评估包括矩阵共识认知电池,辅以颜色单词干扰测试。进行方差分析(ANOVAs)和相关分析。结果:UMS组和MM组在某些认知领域(如加工速度、注意力/警惕性、工作记忆、言语学习)的表现明显差于NC组,但在其他领域(如推理和解决问题、社会认知)的表现不佳。在视觉学习方面,MM组的表现明显差于NC组,而在抑制方面,UMS组的表现明显差于NC组。结论:一种新的与多模态幻觉相关的认知特征被记录下来。两个临床组在视觉学习和抑制方面表现的分离表明,这些认知领域可能与幻觉有关,有待进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书