Using latent profiles to evaluate response to a language-based intervention

IF 4.5 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Philip Capin, Laura Mesite, Anna-Mari Fall, Ryan Sainsbury, Sandra Gillam, Colby Hall, Ron Gillam
{"title":"Using latent profiles to evaluate response to a language-based intervention","authors":"Philip Capin,&nbsp;Laura Mesite,&nbsp;Anna-Mari Fall,&nbsp;Ryan Sainsbury,&nbsp;Sandra Gillam,&nbsp;Colby Hall,&nbsp;Ron Gillam","doi":"10.1007/s11881-026-00372-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many children with oral language difficulties also experience challenges with word reading, as evidenced in the high comorbidity rate between developmental language disorders and dyslexia. The current study investigated a sample of students (<i>n</i> = 357) with language and literacy difficulties classified into latent classes based on pre-intervention performance on word reading and listening comprehension measures. Specifically, this study sought to determine the extent to which latent classes responded to an evidence-based, narrative language program at immediate post-test and a five-month follow-up time point, and whether performance varied as a function of class membership. Findings revealed that students in all latent profiles showed statistically significant improvements in narrative language at post-test, a primary target of the intervention. However, intervention effects varied at a five-month follow-up time point, with students with the greatest listening comprehension and word reading difficulties showing the most notable gains. Instructional response also varied according to performance on a narrative writing measure. These findings suggest that assessing initial performance on key variables may be able to help educators predict student response and adapt intervention plans to more effectively meet individual needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"76 :","pages":"364 - 388"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-026-00372-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many children with oral language difficulties also experience challenges with word reading, as evidenced in the high comorbidity rate between developmental language disorders and dyslexia. The current study investigated a sample of students (n = 357) with language and literacy difficulties classified into latent classes based on pre-intervention performance on word reading and listening comprehension measures. Specifically, this study sought to determine the extent to which latent classes responded to an evidence-based, narrative language program at immediate post-test and a five-month follow-up time point, and whether performance varied as a function of class membership. Findings revealed that students in all latent profiles showed statistically significant improvements in narrative language at post-test, a primary target of the intervention. However, intervention effects varied at a five-month follow-up time point, with students with the greatest listening comprehension and word reading difficulties showing the most notable gains. Instructional response also varied according to performance on a narrative writing measure. These findings suggest that assessing initial performance on key variables may be able to help educators predict student response and adapt intervention plans to more effectively meet individual needs.

使用潜在概况来评估对基于语言的干预的反应。
许多有口语困难的儿童在单词阅读方面也遇到了挑战,这在发展性语言障碍和阅读障碍之间的高合并率中得到了证明。本研究调查了一组有语言和读写困难的学生(n = 357),根据干预前在单词阅读和听力理解方面的表现,将他们分为潜在的班级。具体而言,本研究试图确定潜在班级在测试后立即和五个月的随访时间点对循证叙事语言课程的反应程度,以及表现是否随班级成员的变化而变化。研究结果显示,所有潜在特征的学生在测试后的叙述语言方面都有统计学上的显著改善,这是干预的主要目标。然而,干预效果在五个月的随访时间点上有所不同,听力理解和单词阅读困难最大的学生表现出最显著的进步。教学反应也会根据在叙述写作测试中的表现而有所不同。这些发现表明,评估关键变量的初始表现可能有助于教育工作者预测学生的反应,并调整干预计划,以更有效地满足个人需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书