Cost-Effectiveness of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma Patients Aged 65 to 69 Years (CAREMM-2110 Study)

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Value in Health Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2026.05.013
Jung Yeon Lee PhD, Seungpil Jung PhD, Sung-Soo Park PhD, Seonggyu Byeon PhD, Seung-Hwan Shin PhD, Young-Woo Jeon PhD, Seung-Ah Yahng PhD, Suein Choi PhD, Jin Seok Kim PhD, Chang-Ki Min PhD
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma Patients Aged 65 to 69 Years (CAREMM-2110 Study)","authors":"Jung Yeon Lee PhD,&nbsp;Seungpil Jung PhD,&nbsp;Sung-Soo Park PhD,&nbsp;Seonggyu Byeon PhD,&nbsp;Seung-Hwan Shin PhD,&nbsp;Young-Woo Jeon PhD,&nbsp;Seung-Ah Yahng PhD,&nbsp;Suein Choi PhD,&nbsp;Jin Seok Kim PhD,&nbsp;Chang-Ki Min PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2026.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a cornerstone therapy for eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but its use in older adults is debated because of concerns about toxicity and cost-effectiveness (CE). This study aimed to evaluate the CE of upfront ASCT compared with nontransplant therapy in newly diagnosed patients with MM aged 65 to 69 years within a single-payer healthcare system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using nationwide claims data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA database, 2009-2024; study enrollment period, 2017-2024), we conducted a CE analysis of 735 patients, of whom 458 received bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone induction followed by ASCT and 277 received nontransplant therapy. A state-transition semi-Markov model-estimated life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and direct medical costs from a healthcare system perspective. Inverse probability of treatment weighting reduced confounding bias, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed parameter uncertainty.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ASCT yielded superior overall survival (4-year: 67.8% vs. 55.0%; HR 0.62, <em>P</em> = .001) and longer time to next treatment (29.8 vs 19.7 months, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), with 0.71 additional QALYs at an incremental cost of $21 378. The incremental CE ratio was $30 251 per QALY, remaining below Korea’s willingness-to-pay threshold of $37 453. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated a 70.3% likelihood of CE at this threshold.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Upfront ASCT is a cost-effective consolidation strategy for appropriately selected patients with MM aged 65 to 69 years within Korea’s single-payer healthcare system, supporting fitness-based rather than age-based transplant eligibility criteria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":"29 9","pages":"Pages 1571-1579"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301526025015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a cornerstone therapy for eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but its use in older adults is debated because of concerns about toxicity and cost-effectiveness (CE). This study aimed to evaluate the CE of upfront ASCT compared with nontransplant therapy in newly diagnosed patients with MM aged 65 to 69 years within a single-payer healthcare system.

Methods

Using nationwide claims data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA database, 2009-2024; study enrollment period, 2017-2024), we conducted a CE analysis of 735 patients, of whom 458 received bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone induction followed by ASCT and 277 received nontransplant therapy. A state-transition semi-Markov model-estimated life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and direct medical costs from a healthcare system perspective. Inverse probability of treatment weighting reduced confounding bias, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed parameter uncertainty.

Results

ASCT yielded superior overall survival (4-year: 67.8% vs. 55.0%; HR 0.62, P = .001) and longer time to next treatment (29.8 vs 19.7 months, P < .001), with 0.71 additional QALYs at an incremental cost of $21 378. The incremental CE ratio was $30 251 per QALY, remaining below Korea’s willingness-to-pay threshold of $37 453. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated a 70.3% likelihood of CE at this threshold.

Conclusion

Upfront ASCT is a cost-effective consolidation strategy for appropriately selected patients with MM aged 65 to 69 years within Korea’s single-payer healthcare system, supporting fitness-based rather than age-based transplant eligibility criteria.
自体干细胞移植治疗65-69岁多发性骨髓瘤患者的成本效益(CAREMM-2110研究)。
目的:自体干细胞移植(ASCT)仍然是符合条件的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的基础治疗方法,但由于对毒性和成本效益(CE)的担忧,其在老年人中的应用存在争议。本研究旨在评估在单一付款人医疗保健系统中,65-69岁新诊断的MM患者中,前期ASCT与非移植治疗的CE比较。方法:使用韩国健康保险审查和评估服务(HIRA数据库,2009-2024;研究入组期,2017-2024)的全国索赔数据,我们对735例患者进行了CE分析,其中458例接受硼替佐米-沙利度胺-地塞米松诱导后进行ASCT, 277例接受非移植治疗。状态转换半马尔可夫模型从医疗保健系统的角度估计了生命年(LYs)、质量调整生命年(QALYs)和直接医疗费用。处理权重的逆概率减少了混杂偏倚,确定性和概率敏感性分析评估了参数的不确定性。结果:ASCT产生了更优的总生存期(4年:67.8% vs. 55.0%; HR 0.62, P = 0.001)和更长的到下一次治疗的时间(29.8个月vs. 19.7个月,P < 0.001),额外的qaly为0.71年,增量成本为21,378美元。每QALY的增量CE比率为30251美元,仍低于韩国37453美元的支付意愿门槛。概率敏感性分析显示,在该阈值处CE的可能性为70.3%。结论:对于韩国单一付款人医疗保健系统中适当选择的65-69岁MM患者,预先ASCT是一种具有成本效益的整合策略,支持基于健康而不是基于年龄的移植资格标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书