Jung Yeon Lee PhD, Seungpil Jung PhD, Sung-Soo Park PhD, Seonggyu Byeon PhD, Seung-Hwan Shin PhD, Young-Woo Jeon PhD, Seung-Ah Yahng PhD, Suein Choi PhD, Jin Seok Kim PhD, Chang-Ki Min PhD
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma Patients Aged 65 to 69 Years (CAREMM-2110 Study)","authors":"Jung Yeon Lee PhD, Seungpil Jung PhD, Sung-Soo Park PhD, Seonggyu Byeon PhD, Seung-Hwan Shin PhD, Young-Woo Jeon PhD, Seung-Ah Yahng PhD, Suein Choi PhD, Jin Seok Kim PhD, Chang-Ki Min PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2026.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a cornerstone therapy for eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but its use in older adults is debated because of concerns about toxicity and cost-effectiveness (CE). This study aimed to evaluate the CE of upfront ASCT compared with nontransplant therapy in newly diagnosed patients with MM aged 65 to 69 years within a single-payer healthcare system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using nationwide claims data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA database, 2009-2024; study enrollment period, 2017-2024), we conducted a CE analysis of 735 patients, of whom 458 received bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone induction followed by ASCT and 277 received nontransplant therapy. A state-transition semi-Markov model-estimated life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and direct medical costs from a healthcare system perspective. Inverse probability of treatment weighting reduced confounding bias, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed parameter uncertainty.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ASCT yielded superior overall survival (4-year: 67.8% vs. 55.0%; HR 0.62, <em>P</em> = .001) and longer time to next treatment (29.8 vs 19.7 months, <em>P</em> < .001), with 0.71 additional QALYs at an incremental cost of $21 378. The incremental CE ratio was $30 251 per QALY, remaining below Korea’s willingness-to-pay threshold of $37 453. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated a 70.3% likelihood of CE at this threshold.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Upfront ASCT is a cost-effective consolidation strategy for appropriately selected patients with MM aged 65 to 69 years within Korea’s single-payer healthcare system, supporting fitness-based rather than age-based transplant eligibility criteria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":"29 9","pages":"Pages 1571-1579"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301526025015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a cornerstone therapy for eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but its use in older adults is debated because of concerns about toxicity and cost-effectiveness (CE). This study aimed to evaluate the CE of upfront ASCT compared with nontransplant therapy in newly diagnosed patients with MM aged 65 to 69 years within a single-payer healthcare system.
Methods
Using nationwide claims data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA database, 2009-2024; study enrollment period, 2017-2024), we conducted a CE analysis of 735 patients, of whom 458 received bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone induction followed by ASCT and 277 received nontransplant therapy. A state-transition semi-Markov model-estimated life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and direct medical costs from a healthcare system perspective. Inverse probability of treatment weighting reduced confounding bias, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed parameter uncertainty.
Results
ASCT yielded superior overall survival (4-year: 67.8% vs. 55.0%; HR 0.62, P = .001) and longer time to next treatment (29.8 vs 19.7 months, P < .001), with 0.71 additional QALYs at an incremental cost of $21 378. The incremental CE ratio was $30 251 per QALY, remaining below Korea’s willingness-to-pay threshold of $37 453. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated a 70.3% likelihood of CE at this threshold.
Conclusion
Upfront ASCT is a cost-effective consolidation strategy for appropriately selected patients with MM aged 65 to 69 years within Korea’s single-payer healthcare system, supporting fitness-based rather than age-based transplant eligibility criteria.
期刊介绍:
Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.