Loss of zinc from zinc-biofortified rice and conventional rice varieties due to various cooking techniques practiced in rural Bangladesh.

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-23 DOI:10.1002/jsfa.70842
Prasenjit Mondal, Melaku Engidaw, Habibul Bari Shozib, Md Mariful Islam, Abdullah Al Mahim, Hai N Phung, Sabuktagin Rahman, Malay Kanti Mridha, Faruk Ahmed
{"title":"Loss of zinc from zinc-biofortified rice and conventional rice varieties due to various cooking techniques practiced in rural Bangladesh.","authors":"Prasenjit Mondal, Melaku Engidaw, Habibul Bari Shozib, Md Mariful Islam, Abdullah Al Mahim, Hai N Phung, Sabuktagin Rahman, Malay Kanti Mridha, Faruk Ahmed","doi":"10.1002/jsfa.70842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Zinc-biofortified rice has the potential to provide a sustainable solution for zinc deficiency, particularly in Asian countries where rice is the primary staple food. However, cooking of raw rice is associated with some loss of micronutrients, including zinc. The literature suggests that the amount of water used during cooking can influence the extent of micronutrient loss in both fortified and conventional rice varieties. This study aimed to estimate the cooking loss of zinc, iron, and phytate, as an important inhibitor of zinc, in zinc-biofortified and conventional rice varieties and to assess the effects of the amount of water used for cooking on the loss of these micronutrients. The secondary objective was to assess the impact on iron.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in zinc content were observed between the biofortified and conventional raw rice varieties. The median zinc content (interquartile range) was 19.7 (19.3, 20.2) mg kg⁻¹ in the biofortified variety and 18.7 (18.3, 18.7) mg kg⁻¹ in the conventional variety (P = 0.012). Cooking resulted in a significant reduction in zinc, iron, and phytate content with higher losses observed when cooking with 'excess' water (39% for zinc and 29% for iron) than when cooking with 'adequate' quantities of water (19% for zinc and 22% for iron).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to estimate the cooking loss of zinc in zinc-biofortified rice in the Bangladeshi context and to estimate the effect of the amount of water used on this loss. Cooking resulted in a significant decrease in zinc and iron content, and there was a dose-response relationship between the amount of water used and the reduction in zinc and iron content. © 2026 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":17725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture","volume":" ","pages":"8202-8209"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.70842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Zinc-biofortified rice has the potential to provide a sustainable solution for zinc deficiency, particularly in Asian countries where rice is the primary staple food. However, cooking of raw rice is associated with some loss of micronutrients, including zinc. The literature suggests that the amount of water used during cooking can influence the extent of micronutrient loss in both fortified and conventional rice varieties. This study aimed to estimate the cooking loss of zinc, iron, and phytate, as an important inhibitor of zinc, in zinc-biofortified and conventional rice varieties and to assess the effects of the amount of water used for cooking on the loss of these micronutrients. The secondary objective was to assess the impact on iron.

Results: Significant differences in zinc content were observed between the biofortified and conventional raw rice varieties. The median zinc content (interquartile range) was 19.7 (19.3, 20.2) mg kg⁻¹ in the biofortified variety and 18.7 (18.3, 18.7) mg kg⁻¹ in the conventional variety (P = 0.012). Cooking resulted in a significant reduction in zinc, iron, and phytate content with higher losses observed when cooking with 'excess' water (39% for zinc and 29% for iron) than when cooking with 'adequate' quantities of water (19% for zinc and 22% for iron).

Conclusion: This is the first study to estimate the cooking loss of zinc in zinc-biofortified rice in the Bangladeshi context and to estimate the effect of the amount of water used on this loss. Cooking resulted in a significant decrease in zinc and iron content, and there was a dose-response relationship between the amount of water used and the reduction in zinc and iron content. © 2026 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

由于孟加拉国农村采用的各种烹饪技术,锌生物强化水稻和传统水稻品种的锌流失。
背景:锌生物强化大米有可能为锌缺乏提供可持续的解决方案,特别是在以大米为主要主食的亚洲国家。然而,煮生米会导致一些微量营养素的损失,包括锌。这些文献表明,烹饪过程中使用的水量可以影响强化和常规水稻品种中微量营养素损失的程度。本研究旨在估计锌生物强化和传统水稻品种中锌、铁和作为锌的重要抑制剂的植酸盐的蒸煮损失,并评估蒸煮用水量对这些微量营养素损失的影响。第二个目标是评估对铁的影响。结果:生物强化大米与常规大米在锌含量上存在显著差异。中位锌含量(四分位数范围)在生物强化品种中为19.7 (19.3,20.2)mg kg -毒血症,在常规品种中为18.7 (18.3,18.7)mg kg -毒血症(P = 0.012)。烹饪导致锌、铁和植酸盐含量显著减少,用“过量”水烹饪(锌39%,铁29%)比用“适量”水烹饪(锌19%,铁22%)时损失更大。结论:这是在孟加拉国环境下首次估计锌生物强化大米中锌的烹饪损失,并估计用水量对这种损失的影响。蒸煮导致锌和铁含量显著降低,且需水量与锌和铁含量降低之间存在剂量-反应关系。©2026作者。约翰威利父子有限公司代表化学工业协会出版的《食品与农业科学杂志》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
634
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, mini-reviews, perspectives and spotlights in these areas, with particular emphasis on interdisciplinary studies at the agriculture/ food interface. Published for SCI by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. SCI (Society of Chemical Industry) is a unique international forum where science meets business on independent, impartial ground. Anyone can join and current Members include consumers, business people, environmentalists, industrialists, farmers, and researchers. The Society offers a chance to share information between sectors as diverse as food and agriculture, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, materials, chemicals, environmental science and safety. As well as organising educational events, SCI awards a number of prestigious honours and scholarships each year, publishes peer-reviewed journals, and provides Members with news from their sectors in the respected magazine, Chemistry & Industry . Originally established in London in 1881 and in New York in 1894, SCI is a registered charity with Members in over 70 countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书