Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Learning Disabilities Identification in U.S. Elementary Schools.

IF 2.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Paul L Morgan,Eric Hengyu Hu
{"title":"Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Learning Disabilities Identification in U.S. Elementary Schools.","authors":"Paul L Morgan,Eric Hengyu Hu","doi":"10.1177/00222194261453914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigated racial and ethnic disparities in learning disabilities (LD) identification in U.S. elementary schools including before and after proposal and implementation of the federal Equity in IDEA regulations. We analyzed repeated cross-sectional data from large samples of U.S. fourth graders participating in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (N = 1,607,010; ns = 103,150 to 205,860) across 2003 to 2022. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounds including student academic achievement, English Language Learner (ELL) status, family economic background, and school contextual factors yielded consistent evidence of LD under-identification of students of color in U.S. elementary schools. These disparities have been largely stable over time, particularly for Black students (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] range = 0.50 to 0.69) and students of other races or ethnicities (aOR range = 0.47 to 0.82). Hispanic students (aOR range = 0.45 to 0.83), girls (aOR range = 0.64 to 0.90), and ELLs (aOR range = 0.32 to 0.59) have also been consistently less likely to be identified. The size of these disparities has decreased over time. We observed no evidence of LD over-identification of students of color to support the Equity in IDEA regulations.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"47 1","pages":"222194261453914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194261453914","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated racial and ethnic disparities in learning disabilities (LD) identification in U.S. elementary schools including before and after proposal and implementation of the federal Equity in IDEA regulations. We analyzed repeated cross-sectional data from large samples of U.S. fourth graders participating in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (N = 1,607,010; ns = 103,150 to 205,860) across 2003 to 2022. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounds including student academic achievement, English Language Learner (ELL) status, family economic background, and school contextual factors yielded consistent evidence of LD under-identification of students of color in U.S. elementary schools. These disparities have been largely stable over time, particularly for Black students (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] range = 0.50 to 0.69) and students of other races or ethnicities (aOR range = 0.47 to 0.82). Hispanic students (aOR range = 0.45 to 0.83), girls (aOR range = 0.64 to 0.90), and ELLs (aOR range = 0.32 to 0.59) have also been consistently less likely to be identified. The size of these disparities has decreased over time. We observed no evidence of LD over-identification of students of color to support the Equity in IDEA regulations.
美国小学学习障碍鉴定中的种族差异。
本研究调查了美国小学在学习障碍(LD)识别方面的种族差异,包括联邦教育理念公平法规提出和实施前后的差异。我们分析了2003年至2022年间参与国家教育进步评估的美国四年级学生大样本的重复横截面数据(N = 1,607,010; ns = 103,150至205,860)。多变量逻辑回归模型调整了潜在的混杂因素,包括学生的学业成绩、英语学习者(ELL)状况、家庭经济背景和学校背景因素,得出了一致的证据,证明美国小学有色人种学生的LD识别不足。随着时间的推移,这些差异在很大程度上保持稳定,尤其是黑人学生(调整后的优势比[aOR]范围= 0.50至0.69)和其他种族或民族的学生(aOR范围= 0.47至0.82)。西班牙裔学生(aOR范围= 0.45至0.83)、女孩(aOR范围= 0.64至0.90)和ELLs (aOR范围= 0.32至0.59)也一直不太可能被发现。这些差距的大小随着时间的推移而缩小。我们没有观察到有色人种学生的LD过度识别的证据来支持IDEA规定的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Learning Disabilities (JLD), a multidisciplinary, international publication, presents work and comments related to learning disabilities. Initial consideration of a manuscript depends upon (a) the relevance and usefulness of the content to the readership; (b) how the manuscript compares to other articles dealing with similar content on pertinent variables (e.g., sample size, research design, review of literature); (c) clarity of writing style; and (d) the author"s adherence to APA guidelines. Articles cover such fields as education, psychology, neurology, medicine, law, and counseling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书